The Interpersonal Consequences of Processing Ease: Fluency as a Metacognitive Foundation for Prejudice

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 143-148

  Lick, David J ^a   Johnson, Kerri L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

fluency; metacognition; prejudice; social evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926455800     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721414558116     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alter A. L.,Oppenheimer D. M.. 2009;:
2. Pearson A. R.,Dovidio J. F.. 2013;:
3. Winkielman P.,Schwarz N.,Fazendeiro T.,Reber R.. 2003;:
4. Alter A. L.The benefits of cognitive disfluency.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2013;22:437-442
5. Alter A. L.,Oppenheimer D. M.Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle).Psychological Science. 2008;19:161-167
6. Alter A. L.,Oppenheimer D. M.Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2009;13:219-235
7. Belke B.,Leder H.,Strobach T.,Carbon C. C.Cognitive fluency: High-level processing dynamics in art appreciation.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2010;4:214-222
8. Briñol P.,Petty R. E.,Tormala Z. L.The malleable meaning of subjective ease.Psychological Science. 2006;17:200-206
9. Claypool H. M.,Housley M. K.,Hugenberg K.,Bernstein M. J.,Mackie D. M.Easing in: Fluent processing brings others into the ingroup.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2012;15:441-455
10. Dijksterhuis A.,Macrae C. N.,Haddock G.When recollective experiences matter: Subjective ease of retrieval and stereotyping.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999;25:766-774
11. Dovidio J. F.,Kawakami K.,Gaertner S. L.Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:62-68
12. Hate crime statistics, 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice; 2011:
13. Fiske S. T.,Neuberg S. L.Advances in experimental social psychology. Zanna M. P., ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990:1-74.
14. Freitas A. L.,Azizian A.,Travers S.,Berry S. A.The evaluative connotation of processing fluency: Inherently positive or moderated by motivational context?.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2005;41:636-644
15. Halberstadt J.,Winkielman P.Easy on the eyes, or hard to categorize: Classification difficulty decreases the appeal of facial blends.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;50:175-183
16. Hansen J.,Wänke M.The experience of thinking: How feelings from mental processes influence cognition and behavior. Unkelbach C.Greifeneder R., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2012:70-84.
17. Kelley C. M.,Rhodes M. G.Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment.The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 2002;41:293-320
18. Laham S. M.,Alter A. L.,Goodwin G. P.Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: Discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong.Cognition. 2009;112:462-466
19. Laham S. M.,Koval P.,Alter A. L.The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012;48:752-756
20. Lev-Ari S.,Keysar B.Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010;46:1093-1096
21. Lick D. J.,Durso L. E.,Johnson K. L.Minority stress and physical health among sexual minorities.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8:521-548
22. Lick D. J.,Johnson K. L.Fluency of visual processing explains prejudiced evaluations following categorization of concealable identities.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49:419-425
23. Lick D. J.,Johnson K. L.,Rule N. O.Disfluent processing helps to explain anti-bisexual prejudice.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. in press;:
24. PearsonA. R. (2011). Intergroup fluency: A metacognitive approach to intergroup perception (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order No. 3496948)
25. Pearson A. R.,Dovidio J. F.Social cognition and communication. Forgas J. P.Laszlo J.Vincze O., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2013:101-120.
26. Pearson A. R.,Dovidio J. F.,Phills C. E.,Onyeador I. N.Attitude–goal correspondence and interracial interaction: Implications for executive function and impression formation.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49:907-914
27. Pearson A. R.,West T. V.,Dovidio J. F.,Powers S. R.,Buck R.,Henning R.The fragility of intergroup relations: Divergent effects of delayed audiovisual feedback in intergroup and intragroup interaction.Psychological Science. 2008;19:1272-1279
28. Pettigrew T. F.,Meertens R. W.Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1995;25:57-75
29. Reber R.,Schwarz N.,Winkielman P.Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004;8:364-382
30. Rubin M.,Paolini S.,Crisp R. J.A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010;46:21-28
31. Shelton J. N.,Richeson J. A.Intergroup contact and pluralistic ignorance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;88:91-107
32. Song H.,Schwarz N.If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation.Psychological Science. 2008;19:986-988
33. Song H.,Schwarz N.If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception.Psychological Science. 2009;20:135-138
34. Strabac Z.,Listhaug O.Anti-Muslim prejudices in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries.Social Science Research. 2008;37:268-286
35. Unkelbach C.Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2007;33:219-230
36. Wegener D. T.,Petty R. E.Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;68:36-51
37. Weick M.,Guinote A.When subjective experiences matter: Power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;94:956-970
38. Whittlesea B. W.Illusions of familiarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1993;19:1235-1253
39. Williams D. R.,Mohammed S. A.Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research.Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;32:20-47
40. Winkielman P.,Halberstadt J.,Fazendeiro T.,Catty S.Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind.Psychological Science. 2006;17:799-806
41. Winkielman P.,Schwarz N.,Belli R. F.The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events.Psychological Science. 1998;9:124-126
42. Winkielman P.,Schwarz N.,Fazendeiro T.,Reber R.The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. Musch J.Klauer K. C., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2003:189-217.