Analysing access to the local REDD+ benefits of Sungai Lamandau, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Asia Pacific Viewpoint

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 96-110

  Howson, Peter ^a   Kindon, Sara ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Access; Agency; Benefit sharing; Forest carbon finance; Indonesia; REDD+

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOREST MANAGEMENT;

CENTRAL KALIMANTAN; INDONESIA;

EID: 84926443145     PISSN: 13607456     EISSN: 14678373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/apv.12089     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Angelsen, A. and D. McNeill (2012) The Evolution of REDD+, in A. Arild, B. Maria, D.S. William and V.V. Louis (eds.), Analysing REDD+ challenges and choices, pp. 31-49. Bogor: CIFOR.
2. Astuti, R.Y. and A. McGregor (2015) REDD+ governmentality in Indonesia: Governing forest carbon through the REDD+ Task Force, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56(1): 21-36.
3. Belcher, B. (2012) Forests, poverty and conservation: An overview of the issues, in D. Roe, J. Elliott, C. Sandbrook and M. Walpole (eds.), Biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation: Exploring the evidence for a link, pp. 82-89. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
4. Berger, M. (1989) Giving women credit: The strengths and limitations of credit as a tool for alleviating poverty, World Development 17(7): 1017-1032.
5. Berkes, F. (2012) Poverty reduction isn't just about money: Community perceptions of conservation benefits, in D. Roe, J. Elliott, C. Sandbrook and M. Walpole (eds.), Biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation: Exploring the evidence for a link, pp. 270-285. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
6. Blaikie, P. (1985) The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries, London: Longman.
7. Brockhaus, M., M. Di Gregorio and S. Mardiah (2013) Governing the design of national REDD+: An analysis of the power of agency, Forest Policy and Economics 49: 23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.003
8. Corbera, E. and K. Brown (2010) Offsetting benefits? Analyzing access to forest carbon, Environment and Planning A 42(7): 1739-1761.
9. de Janvry, A., G. Gordillo, J.P. Platteau and E. Sadoulet (2001) Access to land, rural poverty, and public action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. den Besten, J.W., B. Arts and P. Verkooijen (2014) The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics, Environmental Science & Policy 35(1): 40-48.
11. DtE (2001) Dibalik Kerusuhan di Kalimantan Tengah. Retrieved 10 May 2014, from website http://www.downtoearth-indonesia.org/id/story/dibalik-kerusuhan-di-kalimantan-tengah
12. Galudra, G., M. van Noordwijk, S. Suyanto, I. Sardi, U. Pradhan and D. Catacutan (2011) Hot spots of confusion: Contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, International Forestry Review 13(4): 431-441.
13. Hospes, O. (1992) People that count: The forgotten faces of rotating savings and credit associations in Indonesia, Savings and Development 16(4): 371-401.
14. ICRAF (2010) Exploration of Landscape Dynamics in the Buffer Area of Lamandau River Wildlife Reserve and its neighboring area, Central Kalimantan, using the FALLOW model. Retrieved 12 March 2013, from website http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/regions/southeast_asia/
15. Indrarto, G.B., P. Murharjanti, J. Khatarina etal. (2012) The context of REDD+ in Indonesia: Drivers, agents and institutions. Working Paper 92. CIFOR, Bogor.
16. Kosoy, N. and E. Corbera (2010) Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics 69(6): 1228-1236.
17. Leach, M., R. Mearns and I. Scoones (1999) Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management, World Development 27(2): 225-247.
18. Li, T.M. (2010) Indigeneity, capitalism, and the management of dispossession, Current Anthropology 51(3): 385-414.
19. Lindhjem, H., G. Bråten, A. Gleinsvik and I. Aronsen (2010) Experiences with benefit sharing: Issues and options for REDD-plus. Econ Pöyry and Vista report R-2010-018.
20. Lo, A. (2013) Carbon trading in a socialist market economy: Can China make a difference?, Ecological Economics 87(1): 72-74.
21. Lohmann, L. (2008) Carbon trading, climate justice and the production of ignorance: Ten examples, Development (Cambridge, England) 51(3): 359-365.
22. Lohmann, L. (2009) Neoliberalism and the calculable world: The rise of carbon trading, in S. Bohm and S. Dabhi (eds.), Upsetting the offset: The political economy of carbon markets, pp. 25-40. London: Mayfly Books.
23. Lounella, A. (2015) Climate change disputes and justice in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56(1): 62-78.
24. Lovell, H., H. Bulkeley and D. Liverman (2009) Carbon offsetting: Sustaining consumption?, Environment and Planning A 41(10): 2357-2379.
25. Lund, C. (2002) Negotiating property institutions: On the symbiosis of property and authority in Africa, in K. Juul and C. Lund (eds.), Negotiating property in Africa, pp. 11-43. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
26. McDermott, C.L. (2014) REDDuced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon - The search for common interests in international forest governance, Environmental Science & Policy 35(1): 12-19.
27. McGregor, A., S. Weaver, E. Challies, P. Howson, R. Astuti and B. Haalboom (2014) Practical critique: Bridging the gap between critical and practice-oriented REDD+ research communities, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 55(3): 277-291.
28. MacPherson, C.B. (1978) Property: Mainstream and critical positions, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
29. Margono, B.A., P.V. Potapov, S. Turubanova, F. Stolle and M.C. Hansen (2014) Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000-2012, Nature Climate Change 4(June): 730-735.
30. Marino, E. and J. Ribot (2012) Special Issue Introduction: Adding insult to injury: Climate change and the inequities of climate intervention, Global Environmental Change 22(2): 323-328.
31. Milne, S. and B. Adams (2012) Market masquerades: Uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia, Development and Change 43(1): 133-158.
32. Milne, S. and E. Niesten (2009) Direct payments for biodiversity conservation in developing countries: Practical insights for design and implementation, Oryx 43(4): 530-541.
33. Mulyani, M. and P. Jepson (2015) Social learning through a REDD+ 'village agreement': Insights from the Kalimantan Forests Climate Partnership (KFCP) in Indonesia, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 56(1): 79-95.
34. Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy and P. May (2010) Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics 69(6): 1202-1208.
35. Pant, P. (2011) Carbon, conservation, communities under sustainability (C3S) paradigm for forests, in Walter Leal Filho (ed.), The economic, social and political elements of climate change, pp. 543-553. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
36. Peluso, N.L. (2007) Violence, decentralization, and resource access in Indonesia, Peace Review 19(1): 23-32.
37. Pistorius, T., C.B. Schmitt, D. Benick, S. Entenmann and S. Reinecke (2011) Greening REDD? - Challenges and opportunities for integrating biodiversity safeguards at and across policy levels, German Journal of Forest Science 182(5/6): 82-98.
38. Resosudarmo, I.A.P., S. Atmadja, A.D. Ekaputri, D.Y. Intarini, Y. Indriatmoko and P. Astri (2013) Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five emerging sites in Indonesia, World Development 55(3): 68-83.
39. Ribot, J.C. (1998) Theorizing access: Forest profits along Senegal's charcoal commodity chain, Development and Change 29(2): 307-341.
40. Ribot, J.C. (2000) Forest rebellion and local authority in makacoulibantang, eastern Senegal, in C. Zerner (ed.), People, plants and justice, pp. 134-158. New York: Columbia University Press.
41. Ribot, J.C. and N.L. Peluso (2003) A theory of access, Rural Sociology 68(2): 153-181.
42. Saturi, S. (2014) Memperjuangan Kemerdekaan, meraih pengakuan hak masyarakat adat. Retrieved 11 August 2014, from website http://www.mongabay.co.id/tag/diskiriminasi-masyarakat-adat/
43. Shipton, P. and M. Goheen (1992) Understanding African land-holding: Power, wealth, and meaning, Africa: Journal of the International Institute of African Languages and Cultures 62(3): 307-325.
44. Sikor, T. and C. Lund (2009) Access and property: A question of power and authority, Development and Change 40(1): 1-22.
45. Tawney, R.G. (1978) Property and creative work, in C.B. MacPherson (ed.), Property: Main-stream and critical positions, pp. 133-151. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
46. Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., C. McDermott, M.J. Vijge and B. Cashore (2012) Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(6): 1-8.
47. Wemaere, M., C. Streck and T. Chagas (2009) Legal ownership and nature of Kyoto units and EU allowances, in D. Freestone and C. Streck (eds.), Legal aspects of carbon trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen and beyond, pp. 35-58. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.