Independent components of neural activity carry information on individual populations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2014, Pages

  Gła̧bska, Helena ^a   Potworowski, Jan ^a   Łȩski, Szymon ^a   Wójcik, Daniel K ^a  

^a NENCKI INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL POPULATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MODEL; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; SPIKE WAVE; THALAMOCORTICAL TRACT; VALIDATION PROCESS; ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; PYRAMIDAL CELLS;

EID: 84926427939     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105071     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Buzsáki G, Anastassiou CA, Koch C (2012) The origin of extracellular fields and currents - EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 407-420.
2. Einevoll GT, Kayser C, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2013) Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 14: 770-785.
3. Hunt MJ, Falinska M, Łȩski S, Wójcik DK, Kasicki S (2011) Differential effects produced by ketamine on oscillatory activity recorded in the rat hippocampus, dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens. J Psychopharmacol 25: 808-821.
4. Lindén H, Tetzlaff T, Potjans TC, Pettersen KH, Grün S, et al. (2011) Modeling the spatial reach of the LFP. Neuron 72: 859-872.
5. Łȩski S, Lindén H, Tetzlaff T, Pettersen KH, Einevoll GT (2013) Frequency dependence of signal power and spatial reach of the local field potential. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003137.
6. Stone JV (2004) Independent Component Analysis. A Bradford Book.
7. Hyvärinen A, Karhunen J, Oja E (2001) Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, inc.
8. Łȩski S, Kublik E, Swiejkowski DA, Wróbel A, Wójcik DK (2010) Extracting functional components of neural dynamics with Independent Component Analysis and inverse Current Source Density. J Comput Neurosci 29: 459-473.
9. Makarov VA, Makarova J, Herreras O (2010) Disentanglement of local field potential sources by independent component analysis. J Comput Neurosci 29: 445-457.
10. Einevoll GT, Pettersen KH, Devor A, Ulbert I, Halgren E, et al. (2007) Laminar population analysis: estimating firing rates and evoked synaptic activity from multielectrode recordings in rat barrel cortex. J Neurophysiol 97: 2174-2190. (Pubitemid 46411152)
11. Makarova J, Ibarz JM, Makarov VA, Benito N, Herreras O (2011) Parallel readout of pathway-specific inputs to laminated brain structures. Front Syst Neurosci 5: 77.
12. Gratiy SL, Devor A, Einevoll GT, Dale AM (2011) On the estimation of population-specific synaptic currents from laminar multielectrode recordings. Front Neuroinform 5: 32.
13. Potworowski J, Jakuczun W, Łȩski S, Wójcik D (2012) Kernel current source density method. Neural Comput 24: 541-575.
14. Traub RD, Contreras D, Cunningham MO, Murray H, LeBeau FEN, et al. (2005) Single-column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts. J Neurophysiol 93: 2194-2232. (Pubitemid 40404417)
15. Einevoll GT, Lindén H, Tetzlaff T, Łȩski S, Pettersen KH (2012) Local Field Potentials. Biophysical Origin and Analysis. In: Principles of neural coding, CRC Press. pp. 37-61.
16. Stevens CF (1966) Neurophysiology: A primer. Wiley New York.
17. Nicholson C (1973) Theoretical analysis of field potentials in anisotropic ensembles of neuronal elements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 20: 278-288.
18. Gleeson P, Steuber V, Silver RA (2007) NeuroConstruct: a tool for modeling networks of neurons in 3D space. Neuron 54: 219-235. (Pubitemid 46561205)
19. Holt (1998) A critical reexamination of some assumptions and implications of cable theory in neurobiology, Appendix C. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
20. Hines ML, Carnevale NT (1997) The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Comput 9: 1179-1209. (Pubitemid 127469144)
21. Pitts W (1952) Investigations on synaptic transmission. In: Cybernetics, Trans. 9th Conf. Josiah Macy, New York. pp.159-162.
22. Nicholson C, Freeman JA (1975) Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 38: 356-368.
23. Pettersen KH, Devor A, Ulbert I, Dale AM, Einevoll GT (2006) Current-source density estimation based on inversion of electrostatic forward solution: effects of finite extent of neuronal activity and conductivity discontinuities. J Neurosci Methods 154: 116-133. (Pubitemid 43816718)
24. Łȩski S, Wójcik DK, Tereszczuk J, Swiejkowski DA, Kublik E, et al. (2007) Inverse Current-Source Density method in 3D: reconstruction fidelity, boundary effects, and influence of distant sources. Neuroinformatics 5: 207-222. (Pubitemid 351496191)
25. Wójcik DK, Łȩski S (2010) Current source density reconstruction from incomplete data. Neural Comput 22: 48-60.
26. Łȩski S, Pettersen KH, Tunstall B, Einevoll GT, Gigg J, et al. (2011) Inverse Current Source Density method in two dimensions: Inferring neural activation from multielectrode recordings. Neuroinformatics 9: 401-425.
27. Stone JV, Porrill J, Porter NR, Wilkinson ID (2002) Spatiotemporal independent component analysis of event-related fMRI data using skewed probability density functions. Neuroimage 15: 407-421. (Pubitemid 34852550)
28. Lay D (1997) Linear Algebra and its Applications. Addison-Wesley.
29. Press W, Flannery B, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W (1989) Numerical Recipies in C. Cambridge University Press.
30. McKeown MJ, Jung TP, Makeig S, Brown G, Kindermann SS, et al. (1998) Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the Stroop color-naming task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 803-810. (Pubitemid 28124871)
31. Delorme A, Palmer J, Onton J, Oostenveld R, Makeig S (2012) Independent EEG sources are dipolar. PLoS One 7: e30135.
32. Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, et al. (2000) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37: 163-178. (Pubitemid 30140282)
33. Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, et al. (2000) Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 111: 1745-1758.
34. Makeig S, Jung TP, Bell AJ, Ghahremani D, Sejnowski TJ (1997) Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 10979-10984. (Pubitemid 27430846)
35. Di S, Baumgartner C, Barth DS (1990) Laminar analysis of extracellular field potentials in rat vibrissa/barrel cortex. J Neurophysiol 63: 832-840. (Pubitemid 20138754)
36. Nelson MJ, Bosch C, Venance L, Pouget P (2013) Microscale inhomogeneity of brain tissue distorts electrical signal propagation. J Neurosci 33: 2821-2827.
37. Goto T, Hatanaka R, Ogawa T, Sumiyoshi A, Riera J, et al. (2010) An evaluation of the conductivity profile in the somatosensory barrel cortex of Wistar rats. J Neurophysiol 104: 3388-3412.
38. Reimann MW, Anastassiou CA, Perin R, Hill SL, Markram H, et al. (2013) A biophysically detailed model of neocortical local field potentials predicts the critical role of active membrane currents. Neuron 79: 375-390.
39. Bédard C, Kröger H, Destexhe A (2006) Does the 1/f frequency scaling of brain signals reflect self-organized critical states? Phys Rev Lett 97: 118102.