Parallel readout of pathway-specific inputs to laminated brain structures

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue SEPTEMBER 2011, 2011, Pages

  Makarova, Julia ^a   Ibarz, José M ^b   Makarov, ValeriA ^c   Benito, Nuria ^a   Herreras, Oscar ^a  

^a INSTITUTO CAJAL   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RAMÓN Y CAJAL   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computational neuronal model; Independent component analysis; Local field potentials; Neuronal circuits

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; COMPUTATIONAL NEURONAL MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; HIPPOCAMPAL CA3 REGION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; LOCAL FIELD POTENTIAL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL; POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PRESYNAPTIC NERVE; PRESYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PROJECTION NERVE CELL; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; SCALE UP; SIMULATION; SYNAPTOSOME; THALAMUS INTRALAMINAR NUCLEUS; TIME;

EID: 84856149542     PISSN: 16625137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00077     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersen, P., Bliss, T. V. P., and Skrede, K. K. (1971). Lamellar organization of hippocampal excitatory pathways. Exp. Brain Res. 13, 222-238.
2. Andersen, P., and Lømo, T. (1966). Mode of activation of hippocam-pal pyramidal cells by excitatory synapses on dendrites. Exp. Brain Res. 2, 247-260.
3. Bannister, N. J., and Larkman, A. U. (1995a). Dendritic morphology of CA1 pyramidal neurones from the rat hippocampus: I. Branching patterns. J. Comput. Neurol. 360, 150-160.
4. Bannister, N. J., and Larkman, A. U. (1995b). Dendritic morphology of CA1 pyramidal neurones from the rat hippocampus: II. Spine distributions. J. Comput. Neurol. 360, 161-171.
5. Bédard, C., Rodrigues, S., Roy, N., Con-treras, D., and Destexhe, A. (2010). Evidence for frequency-dependent extracellular impedance from the transfer function between extracellular and intracellular potentials: intracellular-LFP transfer function. J. Comput. Neurosci. 29, 389-403.
6. Bell, A., and Sejnowski, T. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural. Comput. 7, 1129-1159.
7. Boss, B. D., Turlejski, K., Stan-field, B. B., and Cowan, W. M. (1987). On the numbers of neurons in fields CA1 and CA3 of the hippocampus of Sprague-Dawley and Wistar rats. Brain Res. 406, 280-287.
8. Bower, J. M., and Beeman, D. (1998). The book of Genesis. Exploring Realistic Neural Models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System, 2nd Edn. New York: Springer Verlag.
9. Brankack, J., Stewart, M., and Fox, S. E. (1993). Current source density analysis of the hippocampal theta rhythm: associated sustained potentials and candidate synap-tic generators. Brain Res. 615, 310-327.
10. Buzsáki, G., Czopf, J., Kondákor, I., and Kellényi, L. (1986). Laminar distribution of hippocampal rhythmic slow activity (RSA) in the behaving rat: current-source density analysis, effects of ure-thane and atropine. Brain Res. 365, 125-137.
11. Buzsáki, G., Leung, L. W., and Vander-wolf, C. H. (1983). Cellular bases of hippocampal EEG in the behaving rat. Brain Res. 287, 139-171.
12. Canals, S., López-Aguado, L., and Herreras, O. (2005). Synaptically-recruited apical currents are required to initiate axonal and apical spikes in hippocampal pyramidal cells: modulation by inhibition. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 909-918.
13. Choi, S., Cichocki, A., Park, H. M., and Lee, S. Y. (2005). Blind source separation and independent component analysis: a review. Neural Inf. Process. Lett. Rev. 6, 1-57.
14. Csicsvari, J., Jamieson, B., Wise, K. D., and Buzsáki, G. (2003). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. Neuron 37, 311-322.
15. Delorme, A., and Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB:an open sourcetoolbox for analysis of single trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9-21.
16. Eccles, J. C., Sasaki, K., and Strata, P. (1967). Interpretation of the potential fields generated in the cerebellar cortex by a mossy fibre volley. Exp. Brain Res. 3, 58-80.
17. Einevoll, G. T., Pettersen, K. H., Devor, A., Ulbert, I., Halgren, E., and Dale, A. M. (2007). Laminar population analysis: estimating firing rates and evoked synaptic activity from multielectrode recordings in rat barrel cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 2174-2190.
18. Herreras, O. (1990). Propagating dendritic action potential mediates synaptic transmission in CA1 pyramidal cells in situ. J. Neurophysiol. 64, 1429-1441.
19. Hyvärinen, A., and Oja, E. (2000). Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Netw. 13, 411-430.
20. Ibarz, J. M., Makarova, I., and Her-reras, O. (2006). Relation of apical dendritic spikes to output decision in CA1 pyramidal cells during synchronous activation: a computational study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 1219-1233.
21. Jack, J. B., Noble, D., and Tsien, R. (1975). Electric Current Flow in Excitable Cells. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Korovaichuk, A., Makarova, J., Makarov, V. A., Benito, N., and Herreras, O. (2010). Minor contribution of principal excitatory pathways to hip-pocampal LFPs in the anesthetized rat: a combined independent component and current source density study. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 484-497.
23. Leung, L. S., Roth, L., and Canning K. J. (1995). Entorhinal inputs to hippocampal CA1 and dentate gyrus in the rat: a current-source- density study. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 2392-2403.
24. Leung, L. S., and Yu, H. W. (1998). Theta-frequency resonance in hip-pocampal CA1 neurons in vitro demonstrated by sinusoidal current injection. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1592-1596.
25. Llinás, R. R., and Makarov, V. A. (2002). "Brain-machine interface via a neurovascular approach",in Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, eds M. C. Roco and W. S. Bainbridge (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 244-251.
26. López-Aguado, L., Ibarz, J. M., and Her-reras, O. (2001). Activity-dependent changes of tissue resistivity in the CA1 region in vivo are layer-specific: modulation of evoked potentials. Neuroscience 108, 249-262.
27. López-Aguado, L., Ibarz, J. M., Varona, P., and Herreras, O. (2002). Structural in homogeneities differentially modulate action currents and population spikes initiated in the axon or dendrites. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 2809-2820.
28. Lorente de Nó, R. (1934). Studies on the structure of the cerebral cortex. II. Continuation of the study of the ammonic system. J. Psychol. Neurol. 46, 113-177.
29. Lorente de Nó, R. (1947a). Analysis of the distribution of action currents of nerves in volume conductors. Stud. Rockefeller Inst. Med. Res. Repr. 132, 384-477.
30. Lorente de Nó, R. (1947b). Action potential of the motoneurones of the hypoglossus nucleus. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 29, 207-288.
31. Makarov, V. A., Makarova, J., and Her-reras, O. (2010). Disentanglement of local field potential sources by independent component analysis. J. Comput. Neurosci. 29, 445-457.
32. Makarova, J., Gómez-Galán, M., and Herreras, O. (2008). Layer specific changes in tissue resistivity and spatial cancellation of transmem-brane currents shape the voltage signal during spreading depression in the CA1 vivo. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27, 444-456.
33. Makarova, J., Ibarz, J. M., Canals, S., and Herreras, O. (2007). A steady-state model of spreading depression predicts the importance of an unknown conductance in specific dendritic domains. Biophys. J. 92, 4216-4232.
34. Makarova, J., Makarov, V. A., and Her-reras, O. (2010). A model of sustained field potentials based on gradients of polarization in single neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 2446-2457.
35. Mitzdorf, U. (1985). Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol. Rev. 65, 37-100.
36. Nicholson, C., and Freeman, J. A. (1975). Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anu-ran cerebellum. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 356-368.
37. Nicholson, C., and Llinás, R. (1971). Field potentials in the alligator cerebellum and theory of their relationship to Purkinje cell dendritic spikes. J. Neurophysiol. 34, 509-531.
38. Nunez, P. L., and Srinivasan, R. (2006). Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Rall, W., Burke, R. E., Holmes, W. R., Jack, J. J. B., Redman, S. J., and Segev, I. (1992). Matching dendritic neuron models to experimental data. Physiol. Rev. 72, 159-186.
40. Rall, W., and Shepherd, G. M. (1968). Theoretical reconstruction of field potentials and dendrodendritic synaptic interactions in olfactory bulb. J. Neurophysiol. 31, 884-915.
41. Ray, S., and Maunsell, J. H. R. (2010). Differences in gamma frequencies across visual cortex restrict their possible use in computation. Neuron 67, 885-896.
42. Reichinnek, S., Künsting, T., Draguhn, A., and Both, M. (2010). Field potential signature of distinct mul-ticellular activity patterns in the mouse hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 30, 15441-15449.
43. Stevens, C. F., and Zador, A. M. (1998). Input synchrony and the irregular firing of cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 210-217.
44. Stone, J. V. (2004). Independent Component Analysis: A Tutorial Introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
45. Stuart, G., and Spruston, N. (1998). Determinants of voltage attenuation in neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites. J. Neurosci. 18, 3501-3510.
46. Tanskanen, J. M., Mikkonen, J. E., and Penttonen, M. (2005). Independent component analysis of neural populations from multi-electrode field potential measurements. J. Neurosci. Methods 145, 213-232.
47. Trommald, M., Jensen, V., and Andersen, P. (1995). Analysis of dendritic spines in rat CA1 pyramidal cells intracellularly filled with a fluorescent dye. J. Comput. Neurol. 353, 260-274.
48. Varona, P., Ibarz, J. M., López-Aguado, L., and Herreras, O. (2000). Macroscopic and subcellular factors shaping CA1 population spikes. J. Neuro-physiol. 83, 2192-2208.