Erratum: Optimising the design of intervention studies: critiques and ways forward[Aphasiology, 29, 5, 526, 562, Doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.985884];Optimising the design of intervention studies: critiques and ways forward

Aphasiology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 526-562

  Howard, David ^a   Best, Wendy ^b   Nickels, Lyndsey ^c  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; APHASIA; AWARENESS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN; RANDOMIZATION; SCIENTIST; SIMULATION; SPEECH THERAPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STIMULUS; STUDY DESIGN; THERAPY EFFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

EID: 84926418259     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1052262     Document Type: Erratum

References (73)

1. Abel, S., Schultz, A., Radermacher, I., Willmes, K., & Huber, W. (2005). Decreasing and increasing cues in naming therapy for aphasia. Aphasiology, 19, 831–848. doi:10.1080/02687030500268902
2. Allison, D. B., Franklin, R. D., & Heshka, S. (1992). Reflections on visual inspection, response guided experimentation, and type I error rate in single-case designs. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 45–51. doi:10.1080/00220973.1992.9943848
3. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pergamon.
4. Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161–169. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
5. Best, W., Howard, D., Bruce, C., & Gatehouse, C. (1997). A treatment for anomia: Combining semantics, phonology and orthography. In S. Chiat, J. Law, & J. Marshall (Eds.), Language disorders in children and adults: Psycholinguistic approaches to therapy (pp. 102–129). London: Whurr.
6. Blumberg, C. J. (1984). Comments on “a simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions”. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 539–542. doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-539
7. Borckardt, J. J., Murphy, M. D., Nash, M. R., & Shaw, D. (2004). An empirical examination of visual analysis procedures for clinical practice evaluation. Journal of Social Service Research, 30, 55–73. doi:10.1300/J079v30n03_04
8. Brossart, D. F. (2006). The relationship between visual analysis and five statistical analyses in a simple AB single-case research design. Behavior Modification, 30, 531–563. doi:10.1177/0145445503261167
9. Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Byng, S. C., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Aphasia therapy research: Methodological requirements and illustrative results. In E. Hjelmquist & L. B. Nilsson (Eds.), Communication and handicap. Amsterdam: North Holland and Elsevier.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
12. Crosbie, J. (1989). The inappropriateness of the C statistics for assessing stability or treatment effects with single-subject data. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 315–325.
13. Crosson, B., Fabrizio, K. S., Singletary, F., Cato, M. A., Wierenga, C. E., Parkinson, R. B., … Rothi, L. J. (2007). Treatment of naming in nonfluent aphasia through manipulation of intention and attention: A phase 1 comparison of two novel treatments. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 582–594. doi:10.1017/S1355617707070737
14. Demets, D. L. (1987). Practical aspects in data monitoring: A brief review. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 753–760. doi:10.1002/sim.4780060706
15. Dugard, P., File, P., & Todman, J. (2011). Single-case and small-n experimental designs: A practical guide to randomization tests (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
16. Edmonds, L. A., & Kiran, S. (2006). Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 729. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/053)
17. Faith, M. S., Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1997). Meta-analysis of single-case research. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 245–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Franklin, R. D., Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (Eds.). (1997). Design and analysis of single-case research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Franklin, R. D., Gorman, B. S., Beasley, T. M., & Allison, D. B. (1997). Graphical display and visual analysis. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 119–158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Franklin, S., Buerk, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Generalised improvement in speech production for a subject with reproduction conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 1087–1114. doi:10.1080/02687030244000491
21. Fridriksson, J., Holland, A. L., Beeson, P., & Morrow, L. (2005). Spaced retrieval treatment of anomia. Aphasiology, 19, 99–109. doi:10.1080/02687030444000660
22. Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., Fuller, R., Leon, S. A., Kendall, D., Moore, A., Wu, S. S., … Nadeau, S. E. (2009). Errorless practice as a possible adjuvant to donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 311–322. doi:10.1017/S1355617709090201
23. Gorman, B. S., & Allison, D. B. (1997). Statistical alternatives for single-case designs. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single-case research (pp. 159–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Grayson, E., Hilton, R., & Franklin, S. (1997). Early intervention in a case of jargon aphasia: Efficacy of language comprehension therapy. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 257–276. doi:10.1080/13682829709177100
25. Guyatt, G. H., Haynes, R. B., Jaeschke, R. Z., Cook, D. J., Green, L., Naylor, C. D., … for The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (2000). Users’ guides to the medical literature XXV. Evidence-based medicine: Principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care. JAMA, 284, 1290–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.284.10.1290
26. Hegde, M. N. (2007). A methodological review of randomized clinical trials. Communicative Disorders Review, 1, 17–38.
27. Hillis, A. E. (1998). Treatment of naming disorders: New issues regarding old therapies. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 648–660. doi:10.1017/S135561779846613X
28. Howard, D. (1986). Beyond randomized controlled trials—The case for effective case-studies of the effects of treatment in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 89–102. doi:10.3109/13682828609018546
29. Howard, D. (2003). Single cases, group studies and case series in aphasia therapy. In I. Papathanasiou & R. De Bleser (Eds.), The sciences of aphasia: From therapy to theory (pp. 245–258). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
30. Howard, D., Patterson, K. E., Franklin, S., Morton, J., & Orchard-Lisle, V. M. (1984). Variability and consistency in picture naming by aphasic patients. In F. C. Rose (Ed.), Advances in neurology, 42: Progress in aphasiology. New York, NY: Raven Press.
31. Howard, D., Patterson, K. E., Franklin, S. E., Orchard-Lisle, V. M., & Morton, J. (1985). The treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia: A comparison of two therapy methods. Brain, 108, 817–829. doi:10.1093/brain/108.4.817
32. Kazdin, A. E. (Ed.). (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Kendall, D. L., Rosenbek, J. C., Heilman, K. M., Conway, T., Klenberg, K., Gonzalez Rothi, L. J., & Nadeau, S. E. (2008). Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia. Brain and Language. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.007
34. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 773–787. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/061)
35. Leach, C. (1979). Introduction to statistics: A non-parametric approach for the social sciences. Chichester: John Wiley.
36. Martin, N., Fink, R., Laine, M., & Ayala, J. (2004). Immediate and short-term effects of contextual priming on word retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 867–898. doi:10.1080/02687030444000390
37. Martin, N., Fink, R. B., Renvall, K., & Laine, M. (2006). Effectiveness of contextual repetition priming treatments for anomia depends on intact access to semantics. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 853–866. doi:10.1017/S1355617706061030
38. Matthews, J. N., Altman, D. G., Campbell, M. J., & Royston, P. (1990). Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ, 300, 230–235. doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230
39. Matyas, T., & Greenwood, K. (1990). Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 341–351. doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-341
40. McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. P. (1983). Single subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
41. Meddis, R. (1984). Statistics using ranks: A unified approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
42. Nickels, L. A. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 155–182. doi:10.1080/02643299208252057
43. Nickels, L. A. (2002a). Improving word finding: Practice makes (closer to) perfect? Aphasiology, 16, 1047–1060. doi:10.1080/02687040143000618
44. Nickels, L. A. (2002b). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935–979. doi:10.1080/02687030244000563
45. Nickels, L. A., & Best, W. M. (1996). Therapy for naming disorders (part II): Specifics, surprises and suggestions. Aphasiology, 10, 109–136. doi:10.1080/02687039608248401
46. Nickels, L. A., Howard, D., & Best, W. (2011). On the use of different methodologies in cognitive neuropsychology: Drink deep and from several sources. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28, 475–485. doi:10.1080/02643294.2012.672406
47. Olive, M., & Smith, B. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, 313–324. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301238
48. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/mod_product/design/files/CEBM-Levels-of-Evidence-2.1.pdf
49. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
50. Parker, R., & Brossart, D. (2003). Evaluating single-case research data: A comparison of seven statistical methods. Behavior Therapy, 34, 189–211. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(03)80013-8
51. Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single-case research design and analysis; new directions for psychology and education (pp. 15–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Perdices, M., & Tate, R. L. (2009). Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 904–927. doi:10.1080/09602010903040691
53. Pring, T. (2005). Research methods in communication disorders. London: Whurr.
54. Raymer, A. M., Singletary, F., Rodriguez, A., Ciampitti, M., Heilman, K., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2006). Effects of gesture+verbal treatment for noun and verb retrieval in aphasia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 867–882. doi:10.1017/S1355617706061042
55. Renvall, K., Laine, M., Laakso, M., & Martin, N. (2002). Contextual priming technique in the treatment of chronic anomia. Brain and Language, 83, 32–34. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00059-7
56. Renvall, K., Laine, M., Laakso, M., & Martin, N. (2003). Anomia treatment with contextual priming: A case study. Aphasiology, 17, 305–328. doi:10.1080/729255461
57. Robey, R. R., & Beeson, P. M. (2005, November). Aphasia treatment: Examining the evidence. Paper presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, San Diego, CA.
58. Robey, R. R., Schultz, M. C., Crawford, A. B., & Sinner, C. A. (1999). Review: Single-subject clinical-outcome research: Designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. Aphasiology, 13, 445–473. doi:10.1080/026870399402028
59. Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2001). The comparative effectiveness of gesture and verbal treatments for a specific phonologic naming impairment. Aphasiology, 15, 977–990. doi:10.1080/02687040143000339
60. Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2006). A comparison of verbal and gesture treatments for a word production deficit resulting from acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 20, 1186–1209. doi:10.1080/02687030600757325
61. Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2008). Treating a semantic word production deficit in aphasia with verbal and gesture methods. Aphasiology, 22, 20–41. doi:10.1080/02687030600742020
62. Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York, NY: John Wiley.
63. Schomacher, M., Baumgärtner, A., Winter, B., Lohmann, H., Dobel, C., Wedler, K., … Breitenstein, C. (2006). Erste Ergebnisse zur Effektivität eines intensiven und hochfrequent repetitiven Benenn- und Konversationstrainings bei Aphasie. Logopädie, 4, 22–28.
64. Schwartz, M. F., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Case series investigations in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 477–494. doi:10.1080/02643294.2011.574111
65. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2001). How to summarize single-participant research: Ideas and applications. Exceptionality, 9, 227–244. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX0904_5
66. Smith, J. D. (2012). Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychological Methods, 17, 510–550. doi:10.1037/a0029312
67. Swinburn, K., & Byng, S. (2006). The communication disability profile. London: Connect Press.
68. Tate, R., Mcdonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the single-case experimental design (SCED) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18, 385–401. doi:10.1080/09602010802009201
69. Tate, R., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & Mcdonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item risk of bias in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.824383
70. Thompson, C. K. (2006). Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: The science and the state of the science. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 266–291. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.02.003
71. Tryon, W. W. (1982). A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 423–429. doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-423
72. Wambaugh, J. L. (2003). A comparison of the relative effects of phonologic and semantic cueing treatments. Aphasiology, 17, 433–441. doi:10.1080/02687030344000085
73. Young, L. (1941). On randomness in ordered sequences. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12, 293–300. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731711