Preparation, characterization and humic acid removal capacity of chitosan coated iron-oxide- polyacrylonitrile mixed matrix membrane

Journal of Water Process Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages 93-104

  Panda, Swapna Rekha ^a   Mukherjee, Munmun ^a   De, Sirshendu ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Chitosan; Humic acid; Iron oxide nanoparticles; Mixed matrix membrane

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926386304     PISSN: 22147144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Gaffney J.S., Marley N.A., Clark S.B. Humic and Fulvic Acids: Isolation, Structure, and Environmental Role 1996, American Chemical Society, USA.
2. Costa A.R., de pinho M.N. Effect of membrane pore size and solution chemistry on the ultrafiltration of humic substances solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:49-56.
3. Lowe J., Hossain M.M. Application of ultrafiltration membranes for removal of humic acid from drinking water. Desalination 2008, 218:343-354.
4. Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:5043-5050.
5. Cheng M.L., Ho H.Y., Chiu D.T.Y., Lu F.J. Humic acid - mediated oxidative damages to human erythrocytes: a possible mechanism leading to anemia in blackfoot disease. Free Radical Biol. Med. 1999, 27(3):470-477.
6. http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/drinkingwater/DrinkingWaterGuide4_v8.pdf.
7. Lefebvre E., Legube B. Coagulation-flocculation by ferric chloride of some organic compounds in aqueous solution. Water Res. 1993, 27:433-447.
8. Bolto B., Dixon D., Eldridge R., King S., Linge K. Removal of natural organic matter by ion exchange. Water Res. 2002, 36:5057-5065.
9. 3 catalyst. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47:211-217.
10. Lin C.F., Liu S.H., Hao O.J. Effect of functional groups of humic substances on UF performance. Water Res. 2001, 35:2395-2402.
11. Maartens A., Swart P., Jacobs E.P. Humic membrane foulants in natural brown water, characterization and removal. Desalination 1998, 115:215-227.
12. Galjaard G., Kruithof J.C., Kamp P.C. Influence of NOM and membrane surface charge on UF-membrane fouling. Proceedings AWWA Membrane Technology Conference 2005.
13. Ng L.Y., Leo C.P., Mohammad A.W. Optimizing the incorporation of silica nanoparticles in polysulfone/poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes with response surface methodology. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 121:1804-1814.
14. Chatterjee S., De S. Adsorptive removal of fluoride by activated alumina doped cellulose acetate phthalate (CAP) mixed matrix membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 125:223-238.
15. Shao J., Zhao L., Chen X., He Y. Humic acid rejection and flux decline with negatively charged membranes of different spacer arm lengths and charge groups. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 435:38-45.
16. Teow Y.H., Ahmad A.L., Lim J.K., Ooi B.S. Studies on the surface properties of mixed-matrix membrane and its antifouling properties for humic acid removal. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 128(5):3184-3192.
17. 2) ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Desalination 2011, 273:85-92.
18. Patsios S.I., Sarasidis V.C., Karabelas A.J. A hybrid photocatalysis-ultrafiltration continuous process for humic acids degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 104:333-341.
19. Hwang L.L., Chen J.C., Wey M.Y. The properties and filtration efficiency of activated carbon polymer composite membranes for removal of humic acid. Desalination 2013, 313:166-175.
20. Cabuk M., Yavuz M., Unal H.I., Alan Y. Synthesis, characterization and enhanced antibacterial activity of chitosan-based biodegradable conducting graft copolymers. Polym. Compos. 2014, 10.1002/pc.22965.
21. Yang Z., Li H., Yan H., Wu H., Yang H., Wu Q., Cheng R. Evaluation of a novel chitosan-based flocculant with high flocculation performance, low toxicity and good floc properties. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276:480-488.
22. Bezerra C.S., Farias Lemos C.M.G., de Sousa M., Goncalves L.R.B. Enzyme immobilization onto renewable polymeric matrixes: past, present, and future trends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 10.1002/APP.42125.
23. Guibal E., Vooren M.V., Dempsey B.A., Roussy J. A review of the use of chitosan for the removal of particulate and dissolved contaminants. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41:2487-2514.
24. Zhang X., Bai R. Mechanism and kinetics of humic acid adsorption on to chitosan coated granules. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 264:30-38.
25. Tombacz E., Libor Z., Illes E., Majzik A., Klumpp E. The role of reactive surface sites and complexation by humic acids in the interaction of clay mineral and iron oxide particles. Org. Geochem. 2004, 35:257-267.
26. Illés E., Tombácz E. The role of variable surface charge and surface complexation in the adsorption of humic acid on magnetite. Colloids Surf. A 2003, 230:99-109.
27. Giasuddin A.B., Kanel S.R., Choi H. Adsorption of humic acid onto nanoscale zerovalent iron and its effect on arsenic removal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:2022-2027.
28. A. Kumar, D.A. Musale, Composite solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes, US patent 6,113,794A, 2000.
29. Musale D.A., Kumar A. Effects of surface cross linking on sieving characteristics of chitosan: poly(acrylonitrile) composite nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2000, 21:27-38.
30. Chhaya S., Mondal, Majumdar G.C., De S. Clarifications of stevia extract using cross flow ultrafiltration and concentration by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 89:125-134.
31. Panda S.R., De S. Effects of polymer molecular weight, concentration and role of polyethylene glycol as additive on polyacrylonitrile homopolymer membranes. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54:2375-2391.
32. Porter M.C. Handbook of Industrial Membrane Technology 2005, Crest Publishing House, New Delhi, India.
33. Sarkar B., De S., DasGupta S. Pulsed electric field enhanced ultrafiltration of synthetic and fruit juice. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:582-591.
34. Jin J., Liu D., Zhang D., Yin Y., Zhao X., Zhang Y. Preparation of thin-film composite nano filtration membranes with improved antifouling property and flux using 2,2' oxybis-ethylamine. Desalination 2015, 355:141-146.
35. Wang C., Xiao C., Huang Q., Pan J. A study on structure and properties of poly(p-phenylene terephthamide) hybrid porous membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 474:132-139.
36. Liu C., Bai R. Preparation of chitosan/cellulose acetate blend hollow fibers for adsorptive performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 267:68-77.
37. Marie O., Starzyk F.T., Lavalley J.C. Confirmation of strongest nitrile-hydroxy groups interaction in the side pockets of mordenite zeolites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2:5341-5349.
38. Hsieh C.T., Wu F.L., Yang S.Y. Superhydrophobicity from composite nano/microstructures: Carbon fabrics coated with silica nanoparticles. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202:6103-6108.
39. Ghosh A.K., Jeong B.H., Huang X., Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 311:34-45.
40. Yan W.L., Bai R. Adsorption of lead and humic acid on chitosan hydrogel beads. Water Res. 2005, 39:688-698.
41. Musale D.A., Kumar A., Pleizier G. Formation and characterization of poly(acrylonitrile)/chitosan composite ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 154:163-173.
42. Zhao Z.P., Wang Z., Wang S.C. Formation, charged characteristic and BSA adsorption behavior of carboxymethyl chitosan/PES composite MF membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 217:151-158.
43. Sadeghi I., Aroujalian A., Raisi A., Dabir B., Fathizadeh M. Surface modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes by corona air plasma for separation of oil/water emulsions. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 430:24-36.
44. Panda S.R., De S. Preparation, characterization and fouling properties of polyacrylonitrile/polyurethane blend membranes for water purification. RSC Adv. 2015, 5(30):23599-23612.
45. Mukherjee M., De S. Reduction of microbial contamination from drinking water using an iron oxide nanoparticle-impregnated ultrafiltration mixed matrix membrane: preparation characterization and antimicrobial properties. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 2015, 1:204-217.
46. Hoek E.M.V., Hong S., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:115-128.
47. Homaeigohar S., Koll J., Lilleodden E.T., Elbahri M. The solvent induced interfiber adhesion and its influence on the mechanical and filtration properties of polyethersulfone electrospun nanofibrous microfiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 98:456-463.
48. 2 nanowire addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. Desalination 2011, 272:90-97.
49. Phu N.D., Ngo D.T., Hoang L.H., Luong N.H., Chau N., Hai N.H. Crystallization process and magnetic properties of amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2011, 44:345002-345009.
50. Xuan B.W., Liang X.Z., Hu Y. Electrokinetic and permeation characterization of hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile (PAN) hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane. Sci. China Ser. B: Chem. 2009, 52:683-689.
51. Ngah W.S.W., Hanafiah M.A.K.M., Yong S.S. Adsorption of humic acid from aqueous solutions on crosslinked chitosan - epichlorohydrin beads: kinetics and isotherm studies. Colloid Surf. B 2008, 65:18-24.
52. Wang Z., Ma J., Liu Q. Pure sponge-like membranes bearing both high water permeability and high retention capacity. Desalination 2011, 278:141-149.
53. Yuan W., Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 157:1-12.
54. 2 incorporated polysulfone (PSF)/polyethylene glycol (PEG) blend low pressure nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2014, 347:52-65.
55. Ng Q.H., Lim J.K., Ahmad A.L., Ooi B.S., Low S.C. Efficacy evaluation of the antifouling magnetite - PES composite membrane through QCM-D and magnetophoretic filtration performances. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 132:138-148.
56. 4 lithium ion-sieve membrane. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 235:340-348.