From genes to talent: The DMGT/CMTD perspective;De los genes al talento: la perspectiva DMGT/CMTD

Revista de Educacion

Volumn , Issue 368, 2015, Pages 12-37

  Gagné, Françoys ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biological foundations; Catalysts; CMDT; DMGT; DMNA; Environment; Genetics; Giftedness; Personality; Talent; Talent development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926384841     PISSN: 00348082     EISSN: 1988592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-289     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Angoff, W. H. (1988). The nature-nurture debate, aptitudes, and group differences. American Psychologist, 41, 713-720.
3. Atkinson, J. W. (1978). Motivational determinants of intellective performance and cumulative achievement. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.), Personality, motivation, and achievement, pp. 221-242. New York: Wiley.
4. Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
5. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101.
6. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine.
7. Eppig, C., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2011). Parasite prevalence and the distribution of intelligence among the states of the USA. Intelligence, 39, 155-160.
8. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), The pursuit of excellence in education (pp. 21-55). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
9. Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81-103.
10. Gagné, F. (1998). A proposal for subcategories within the gifted or talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 87-95.
11. nd ed.), pp. 67-79. Oxford: Pergamon.
12. Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming Gifts into Talents: The DMGT as a Developmental Theory. High Ability Studies, 15, 119-147.
13. Gagné, F. (2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 93-118.
14. Gagné, F. (2009). Debating giftedness: Pronat vs. Antinat. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness, pp. 155-198. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
15. Gagné, F. (2013). Yes, giftedness (aka "innate" talent) does exist! In S. B. Kaufman (Ed.): The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice, pp. 191-221. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little, Brown.
17. Goleman, D. (2013). Focus: The hidden driver of excellence. New York: HarperCollins.
18. Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003). The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 636-645.
19. Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79-132.
20. Harden, K. P., Turkheimer, E., & Loehlin, J. C. (2007). Genotype by environment interaction in adolescents's cognitive aptitude. Behavioral genetics, 37, 273-283.
21. Harris, J. R. (1998). The nature assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: The Free Press.
22. Hassall, C., & Sherratt, T. N. (2011). Statistical inference and spatial patterns in correlates of IQ. Intelligence, 39, 303-310.
23. Kagan, J. (1989). Unstable ideas: Temperament, Cognition, and Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (Eds.) (1985). Action control: From cognition to behavior. New-York: Springer-Verlag.
25. nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. McCrae, R. B. (2009). The Five-Factor Model of personality traits: Consensus and controversy. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology, pp. 148-161. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. McPherson, G. E., & Williamon, A. (2006). Giftedness and talent. In G. E. McPherson (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 239-256). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Nurnberger, J. I. Jr., & Bierut, L. J. (2007 April). Seeking the connections: Alcoholism and our genes. Scientific American, 296(4), 46-53.
29. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Penguin.
30. Plomin, R. (1998). Genetic influence and cognitive abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 420-421.
31. rd ed., pp. 113-123). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
32. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., Craig, I. W., & McGuffin, P. (2003). Behavioral genetics In R. Plomin, J. C. DeFries, I. W. Craig, & P. McGuffin, P. (Eds.), Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era, pp. 3-15. Washington, D.C.: APA.
33. Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., & Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
34. Rothbart, M. K. (2012). Advances in temperament: History, concepts, and measures. In M. Zentner & R. L. Shiner (Eds.), Handbook of temperament, pp. 3-20. New York: Guilford Press.
35. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. M. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, pp. 19-136. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Tranckle, P., & Cushion, C. J. (2006). Rethinking giftedness and talent in sport. Quest, 58, 265-282.
37. Treffert, D. A. (2012). Islands of genius: The bountiful mind of the autistic, acquired, and sudden savant. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
38. Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Harden, K. P. (2012). Intellectual interest mediates gene x socioeconomic status interaction on adolescent academic achievement. Child Development, 83, 743-757.
39. Von Stumm, S., Hell, B., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 574-588.
40. th edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.