Temporal trends and current practice patterns for intraoperative ventilation at U.S. academic medical centers: A retrospective study

BMC Anesthesiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wanderer, Jonathan P ^a   Ehrenfeld, Jesse M ^b   Epstein, Richard H ^c   Kor, Daryl J ^d   Bartz, Raquel R ^e   Fernandez Bustamante, Ana ^f   Melo, Marcos Vidal F ^g   Blum, James M ^h  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Intraoperative ventilation; Lung protective ventilation; Practice patterns

Indexed keywords

ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; BREATHING RATE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIDAL VOLUME; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; LUNG DISEASES; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TRENDS;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIDAL VOLUME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84926332448     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712253     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-015-0010-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Gajic O. What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury? Anesthesiology. 2007;106(6):1226-31.
2. Yang M, Ahn HJ, Kim K, Kim JA, Yi CA, Kim MJ, et al. Does a protective ventilation strategy reduce the risk of pulmonary complications after lung cancer surgery? A randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2011;139(3):530-7.
3. Weingarten TN, Whalen FX, Warner DO, Gajic O, Schears GJ, Snyder MR, et al. Comparison of two ventilatory strategies in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(1):16-22.
4. Sundar S, Novack V, Jervis K, Bender SP, Lerner A, Panzica P, et al. Influence of low tidal volume ventilation on time to extubation in cardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(5):1102-10.
5. Costa EL, Musch G, Winkler T, Schroeder T, Harris RS, Jones HA, et al. Mild endotoxemia during mechanical ventilation produces spatially heterogeneous pulmonary neutrophilic inflammation in sheep. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(3):658-69.
6. Wellman TJ, Winkler T, Costa EL, Musch G, Harris RS, Zheng H, et al. Effect of local tidal lung strain on inflammation in normal and lipopolysaccharide-exposed sheep. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(7):e491-500.
7. de Prost N, Costa EL, Wellman T, Musch G, Tucci MR, Winkler T, et al. Effects of ventilation strategy on distribution of lung inflammatory cell activity. Crit Care. 2013;17(4):R175.
8. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Pereira VG, Espósito DC, Pasqualucci Mde O, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308(16):1651-9.
9. Carney D, DiRocco J, Nieman G. Dynamic alveolar mechanics and ventilator-induced lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(3):S122-8.
10. Wrigge H, Uhlig U, Zinserling J, Behrends-Callsen E, Ottersbach G, Fischer M, et al. The effects of different ventilatory settings on pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses during major surgery. Anesth Analg. 2005;98(3):775-81.
11. Kor DJ, Lingineni RK, Gajic O, Park PK, Blum JM, Hou PC, et al. Predicting risk of postoperative lung injury in high-risk surgical patients: a multicenter cohort study. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(5):1168-81.
12. Goldenberg NM, Steinberg BE, Lee WL, Wijeysundera DN, Kavanagh BP. Lung-protect ventilation in the operating room: time to implement? Anesthesiology. 2014;121:184-8.
13. Wanderer JP, Blum JM, Ehrenfeld JM. Intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(19):1861.
14. Hess DR, Kondili D, Burns E, Bittner EA, Schmidt UH. A 5-year observational study of lung-protective ventilation in the operating room: a single-center experience. J Crit Care. 2013;28(4)(533):e9-15.
15. Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:428-37.
16. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301-8.
17. Fernandez-Bustamante A, Wood CL, Tran ZV, Moine P. Intraoperative ventilation: incidence and risk factors for receiving large tidal volumes during general anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiol. 2011;11:22.
18. Fernandez-Bustamante A, Klawitter J, Repine JE, Agazio A, Janocha AJ, Shah C, et al. Early effect of tidal volume on lung injury biomarkers in surgical patients with healthy lungs. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(3):469-81.
19. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Vallès J, Castillo J, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(6):1338-50.