Smoking in school-aged adolescents: Design of a social network survey in six European countries

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Lorant, Vincent ^a   Soto, Victoria Eugenia ^a   Alves, Joana ^b   Federico, Bruno ^c   Kinnunen, Jaana ^d   Kuipers, Mirte ^e   Moor, Irene ^f   Perelman, Julian ^b   Richter, Matthias ^f   Rimpelä, Arja ^d,g   Robert, Pierre Olivier ^a   Roscillo, Gaetano ^c   Kunst, Anton ^e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CASSINO AND SOUTHERN LAZIO   (Italy)

^d TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^f MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^g TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Inequalities; International comparison; Schools; Smoking; Social network

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EUROPE; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SMOKING; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; EUROPE; HUMANS; SMOKING; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84926320443     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1041-z     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224-60.
2. Jha P, Peto R, Zatonski W, Boreham J, Jarvis MJ, Lopez AD. Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America. Lancet. 2006;368:367-70.
3. Axtell R. An agent-based computational model of smoking behavior among adolescents due to peer effects: coordination with addiction in social networks. Washington DC: The brookings institution; 2006.
4. Giskes K, Kunst AE, Benach J, Borrell C, Costa G, Dahl E, et al. Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:395-401.
5. Nagelhout GE, de Korte-de BD, Kunst AE, van der Meer RM, de Vries H, van Gelder BM, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence, consumption, initiation, and cessation between 2001 and 2008 in the Netherlands. Findings from a national population survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:303.
6. Goodman E. The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents' health. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1522-8.
7. Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Karvonen S, Lahelma E. Socioeconomic status and smoking: analysing inequalities with multiple indicators. Eur J Pub Health. 2005;15:262-9.
8. Lowry R, Kann L, Collins JL, Kolbe LJ. The effect of socioeconomic status on chronic disease risk behaviors among US adolescents. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;276:792-7.
9. Melotti R, Heron J, Hickman M, Macleod J, Araya R, Lewis G. Adolescent alcohol and tobacco use and early socioeconomic position: the ALSPAC birth cohort. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e948-55.
10. Wallace C, Galloway T, McKetin R, Kelly E, Leary J. Methamphetamine use, dependence and treatment access in rural and regional North Coast of New South Wales, Australia. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2009;28:592-9.
11. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munaf M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107-23.
12. Hanson MD, Chen E. Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. J Behav Med. 2007;30:263-85.
13. Pförtner TK, Moor I, Rathmann K, Hublet A, Molcho M, Kunst AE, et al. The association between family affluence and smoking among 15-year-old adolescents in 33 European countries, Israel and Canada: the role of national wealth. Addiction. 2014 Sep 15. doi:10.1111/add.12741.
14. Doku D, Koivusilta L, Rainio S, Rimpelä A. Socioeconomic differences in smoking among Finnish adolescents from 1977 to 2007. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:479-87.
15. Richter M, Leppin A. Trends in socio-economic differences in tobacco smoking among German schoolchildren, 1994-2002. Eur J Pub Health. 2007;17:565-71.
16. Linetzky B, Mejia R, Ferrante D, De Maio FG, Diez Roux AV. Socioeconomic status and tobacco consumption among adolescents: a multilevel analysis of Argentina's global youth Tobacco survey. Nicotin Tob Res. 2012;14:1092-9.
17. Mathur C, Erickson DJ, Stigler MH, Forster JL, Finnegan J. Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: a multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis. Am J Public Health. 2013;103:543-8.
18. Kobus K. Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction. 2003;98:37-55.
19. Steglich C, Sinclair P, Holliday J, Moore L. Actor-based analysis of peer influence in A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial (ASSIST). Soc Networks. 2012;34:359-69.
20. Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, Vartiainen E, De Vries H. Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior. Soc Networks. 2010;32:72-81.
21. Ennett ST, Bauman KE, Hussong A, Faris R, Foshee VA, Cai L, et al. The peer context of adolescent substance use: findings from social network analysis. J Res Adolesc. 2006;16:159-86.
22. Schaefer DR, Haas SA, Bishop NJ. A dynamic model of US adolescents' smoking and friendship networks. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:e12-8.
23. Go MH, Green HD, Kennedy DP, Pollard M, Tucker JS. Peer influence and selection effects on adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;109:239-42.
24. Kiuru N, Burk WJ, Laursen B, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE. Pressure to drink but not to smoke: disentangling selection and socialization in adolescent peer networks and peer groups. J Adolesc. 2010;33:801-12.
25. Mercken L, Snijders TAB, Steglich C, de Vries H. Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1506-14.
26. Ennett ST. The peer context of adolescent substance use: Findings from social network analysis. 2006
27. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415-44.
28. Tilly C. Durable Inequity. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1998.
29. Van De Werfhorst HG, Mijs JJB. Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: a comparative perspective. Annu Rev Sociol. 2010;36:407-28.
30. De Looze M, Ter Bogt T, Hublet A, Kuntsche E, Richter M, Zsiros E, et al. Trends in educational differences in adolescent daily smoking across Europe, 2002-10. Eur J Pub Health. 2013;23:846-52.
31. Huisman C, van de Werfhorst HG, Monshouwer K. Adolescent Tobacco Use in the Netherlands: Social Background, Education, and School Organization. Youth Soc. 2011;44:567-86.
32. Lorant V, Bhopal RS. Ethnicity, socio-economic status and health research: insights from and implications of Charles Tilly's theory of Durable Inequality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65:671-5.
33. Dimaggio P, Garip F. How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. Am J Sociol. 2011;116:1887-933.
34. Dupriez V, Dumay X, Vause A. How do school systems manage pupils' heterogeneity? Comp Educ Rev. 2008;52:245-73.
35. Duru-Bellat M, Suchaut B. Organisation and context, efficiency and equity of educational systems: what Pisa tells us ? Eur Educ J. 2005;4:181-94.
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, iLibrary OECD. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2007.
37. Luk Joossens Martin Raw. The Tobacco Control Scale 2010 in Europe, report of the Association of the European Cancer League. Brussels: 2011
38. Dierker L, Swendsen J, Rose J, He J, Merikangas K. Transitions to regular smoking and nicotine dependence in the adolescent national comorbidity survey (NCS-A). Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:394-401.
39. Hawe P, Webster C, Shiell A. A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:971-5.
40. Knoke D, Yang S, Knoke D. Social network analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2008.
41. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA. 1997;278:823-32.
42. Marin A. Simplifying the personal network name generator: Alternatives to traditional multiple and single name generators. 2007.
43. Kirke DM. Collecting peer data and delineating peer networks in a complete network. 1996.
44. Ruan D. The content of the General Social Survey discussion networks: An exploration of General Social Survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context. 1998.
45. Richter M, Vereecken CA, Boyce W, Maes L, Gabhainn SN, Currie CE. Parental occupation, family affluence and adolescent health behaviour in 28 countries. Int J Public Health. 2009;54:203-12.
46. Goodman E, Adler N, Kawachi I, Frazier A, Huang B, Colditz G. Adolescents' perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):E31.
47. Guo HJ, McGee R, Reeder T, Gray A. Smoking behaviours and contextual influences on adolescent nicotine dependence. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010;34:502-7.
48. Sabiston CM, Lovato CY, Ahmed R, Pullman AW, Hadd V, Campbell HS, et al. School smoking policy characteristics and individual perceptions of the school tobacco context: are they linked to students' smoking status? J Youth Adolesc. 2009;38:1374-87.
49. Morris M. Network epidemiology. Oxford editors, en press: 2004.
50. Lubbers M. Group composition and network structure in school classes: a multilevel application of the p∗model. Soc Networks. 2003;25:309-32.
51. Hanquinet L, Vandezande V, Jacobs D, Swyngedouw M. Belgium National Survey Immigrant Minorities. Belgium∈: ISPO-GERME, 2006. Available at: http://www.kbs-frb.be/uploadedFiles/KBS-FRB/Files/NL/PUB-1632-Ullens-BNSIM-DraftQuestionnaire.pdf
52. Currie C, Griebler R, Inchley J, Theunissen A, Molcho M, Samdal O, et al. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study Protocol: Background, Methodology and Background Items for the 2009/10 Survey. Edinburgh, Scotland: Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, and Vienna, Austria: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Promotion Research, 2010. Available at: http://www.hbsc.org.
53. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty- seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38(1):21-37.
54. Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Canada: 2010-11.
55. O'Loughlin J, Tarasuk J, Difranza J, Paradis G. Reliability of selected measures of nicotine dependence among adolescents. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:353-62.
56. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA: 2009.
57. Oksuz E, Multu E, Malhan S. Characteristics of daily and occasional smoking among youths. Public Health. 2007;121:349-56.
58. Fite P, Wynn P, Lochman J, Wells K. The influence of neighbourhood disadvantage and perceived disapproval on early substance use initiation. Addictive Behav. 2009;34:769-71.
59. Wallace S, Fisher C. Substance use attitudes abuse among urban black adolescents: the role of parent, peer and cultural factors. J Youth Adolesc. 2007;36:441-51.
60. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Berry CC. Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA. 1998;279:511-5.
61. Xinguang C et al. Perceived smoking norms, social environmental factors, personal attitudes and adolescent smoking in China: a mediation analysis with longitudinal data. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(4):359-68.
62. Lipperman-Kreda S, Paschall MJ, Grube JW. Perceived enforcement of school tobacco policy and adolescents' cigarette smoking. Prev Med. 2009;48(6):562-6.
63. Poulsen LH, Osler M, Roberts C, Due P, Damsgaard MT, Holstein BE. Exposure to teachers smoking and adolescent smoking behaviour: analysis of cross sectional data from Denmark. Tob Control. 2002;11:246-51.
64. Currie CE, Elton R, Todd J, Platt S. Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Educ. 1997;12(3):385-97.
65. Salmela-Aro K, Upadaya K. The schoolwork engagement inventory: energy, dedication and absorption (EDA). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:60-7.
66. Salmela-Aro K, Tolvanen A, Nurmi JE. Achievement strategies during university studies predict early career burnout and engagement. J Vocat Behav. 2009;75(2):162-72.
67. Carvajal S, Granillo T. A prospective test of distal and proximal determinants of smoking initiation in early adolescents. Addict Behav. 2006;31:649-60.
68. Whirter E, Whirter B. Adolescent future expectations of work, education, familiy and community development of a new measure. Youth Soc. 2008;40:182.
69. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School Policy and Environment (School Questionnaire). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA: 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/shpps/2006/questionnaires/pdf/envl2006questionnaire.pdf