STRESSing the role of the plant circadian clock

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 230-237

  Seo, Pil Joon ^a   Mas, Paloma ^b  

^a Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; OSMOREGULATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT IMMUNITY; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CIRCADIAN CLOCKS; OSMOREGULATION; PLANT IMMUNITY; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84926295681     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.001     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Schaffer R., et al. The late elongated hypocotyl mutation of Arabidopsis disrupts circadian rhythms and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Cell 1998, 93:1219-1229.
2. Wang Z.Y., Tobin E.M. Constitutive expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) gene disrupts circadian rhythms and suppresses its own expression. Cell 1998, 93:1207-1217.
3. Strayer C., et al. Cloning of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1, an autoregulatory response regulator homolog. Science 2000, 289:768-771.
4. Alabadí D., et al. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 2001, 293:880-883.
5. Gendron J.M., et al. Arabidopsis circadian clock protein, TOC1, is a DNA-binding transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:3167-3172.
6. Huang W., et al. Mapping the core of the Arabidopsis circadian clock defines the network structure of the oscillator. Science 2012, 336:75-79.
7. Nakamichi N., et al. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS 9, 7, and 5 are transcriptional repressors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2010, 22:594-605.
8. Farré E.M., et al. Overlapping and distinct roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:47-54.
9. Helfer A., et al. LUX ARRHYTHMO encodes a nighttime repressor of circadian gene expression in the Arabidopsis core clock. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:126-133.
10. Nusinow D.A., et al. The ELF4-ELF3-LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature 2011, 475:398-402.
11. Hsu P.Y., Harmer S.L. Wheels within wheels: the plant circadian system. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:240-249.
12. Más P. Circadian clock function in Arabidopsis thaliana: time beyond transcription. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:273-281.
13. Seo P.J., Mas P. Multiple layers of posttranslational regulation refine circadian clock activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26:79-87.
14. Michael T.P., et al. Enhanced fitness conferred by naturally occurring variation in the circadian clock. Science 2003, 302:1049-1053.
15. Dodd A.N., et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 2005, 309:630-633.
16. Covington M.F., et al. Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol. 2008, 9:R130.
17. Mizuno T., Yamashino T. Comparative transcriptome of diurnally oscillating genes and hormone-responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana: insight into circadian clock-controlled daily responses to common ambient stresses in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49:481-487.
18. Covington M.F., Harmer S.L. The circadian clock regulates auxin signaling and responses in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e222.
19. Pan Y., et al. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases as reporters for circadian-regulated pathways. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:858-878.
20. Fukushima A., et al. Impact of clock-associated Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators in metabolic coordination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:7251-7256.
21. Goodspeed D., et al. Arabidopsis synchronizes jasmonate-mediated defense with insect circadian behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:4674-4677.
22. Arana M.V., et al. Circadian oscillation of gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:9292-9297.
23. Marcolino-Gomes J., et al. Diurnal oscillations of soybean circadian clock and drought responsive genes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e86402.
24. Wilkins O., et al. Time of day shapes Arabidopsis drought transcriptomes. Plant J. 2010, 63:715-727.
25. Kant P., et al. Functional-genomics-based identification of genes that regulate Arabidopsis responses to multiple abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:697-714.
26. Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:221-227.
27. 2+. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10:15-21.
28. Hotta C.T., et al. Modulation of environmental responses of plants by circadian clocks. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30:333-349.
29. Correia M.J., et al. ABA xylem concentrations determine maximum daily leaf conductance of field-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant Cell Environ. 1995, 18:511-521.
30. Hauser F., et al. Evolution of abscisic acid synthesis and signaling mechanisms. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:R346-R355.
31. Kiełbowicz-Matuk A., et al. Interplay between circadian rhythm, time of the day and osmotic stress constraints in the regulation of the expression of a Solanum Double B-box gene. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 2014, 113:831-842.
32. Lopez F., et al. Diurnal regulation of water transport and aquaporin gene expression in maize roots: contribution of PIP2 proteins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44:1384-1395.
33. Legnaioli T., et al. TOC1 functions as a molecular switch connecting the circadian clock with plant responses to drought. EMBO J. 2009, 28:3745-3757.
34. Robertson F.C., et al. Interactions between circadian and hormonal signalling in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69:419-427.
35. Mustroph A., et al. Profiling translatomes of discrete cell populations resolves altered cellular priorities during hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:18843-18848.
36. Kidokoro S., et al. The phytochrome-interacting factor PIF7 negatively regulates DREB1 expression under circadian control in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:2046-2057.
37. Kurup S., et al. Interactions of the developmental regulator ABI3 with proteins identified from developing Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J. 2000, 21:143-155.
38. Koini M.A., et al. High temperature-mediated adaptations in plant architecture require the bHLH transcription factor PIF4. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:408-413.
39. Pokhilko A., et al. Modelling the widespread effects of TOC1 signalling on the plant circadian clock and its outputs. BMC Syst. Biol. 2013, 7:23.
40. Liu T., et al. Direct regulation of abiotic responses by the Arabidopsis circadian clock component PRR7. Plant J. 2013, 76:101-114.
41. Nakamichi N., et al. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50:447-462.
42. Sanchez-Villarreal A., et al. TIME FOR COFFEE is an essential component in the maintenance of metabolic homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2013, 76:188-200.
43. Heintzen C., et al. AtGRP7, a nuclear RNA-binding protein as a component of a circadian-regulated negative feedback loop in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:8515-8520.
44. Kim J.S., et al. Glycine-rich RNA-binding protein 7 affects abiotic stress responses by regulating stomata opening and closing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55:455-466.
45. Cao S., et al. AtGRP7 is involved in the regulation of abscisic acid and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2006, 11:526-535.
46. Golldack D., et al. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:151.
47. + exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:8436-8441.
48. Kim W.Y., et al. Release of SOS2 kinase from sequestration with GIGANTEA determines salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1352.
49. Tsuzuki T., et al. Overexpression of the Mg-chelatase H subunit in guard cells confers drought tolerance via promotion of stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4:440.
50. Habte E., et al. Osmotic stress at the barley root affects expression of circadian clock genes in the shoot. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37:1321-1327.
51. Kumar K., et al. Rice WNK1 is regulated by abiotic stress and involved in internal circadian rhythm. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:316-320.
52. Dodd A.N., et al. The Arabidopsis circadian clock incorporates a cADPR-based feedback loop. Science 2007, 318:1789-1792.
53. Kinmonth-Schultz H.A., et al. Circadian clock-regulated physiological outputs: dynamic responses in nature. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013, 24:407-413.
54. Gilmour S.J., et al. Low temperature regulation of the Arabidopsis CBF family of AP2 transcriptional activators as an early step in cold-induced COR gene expression. Plant J. 1998, 16:433-442.
55. Kurepin L.V., et al. Role of CBFs as integrators of chloroplast redox, phytochrome and plant hormone signaling during cold acclimation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14:12729-12763.
56. Fowler S.G., et al. Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137:961-968.
57. Artlip T.S., et al. CBF gene expression in peach leaf and bark tissues is gated by a circadian clock. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33:866-877.
58. Dong M.A., et al. Circadian clock-associated 1 and late elongated hypocotyl regulate expression of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:7241-7246.
59. Mikkelsen M.D., Thomashow M.F. A role for circadian evening elements in cold-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 60:328-339.
60. Keily J., et al. Model selection reveals control of cold signalling by evening-phased components of the plant circadian clock. Plant J. 2013, 76:247-257.
61. Dodd A.N., et al. Time of day modulates low-temperature Ca signals in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006, 48:962-973.
62. Bieniawska Z., et al. Disruption of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is responsible for extensive variation in the cold-responsive transcriptome. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:263-279.
63. Nakamichi N., et al. Transcriptional repressor PRR5 directly regulates clock-output pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:17123-17128.
64. Cao S., et al. Involvement of GIGANTEA gene in the regulation of the cold stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 24:683-690.
65. Cao S., et al. Freezing sensitivity in the gigantea mutant of Arabidopsis is associated with sugar deficiency. Biol. Plant 2007, 51:359-362.
66. Ibañez C., et al. Overall alteration of circadian clock gene expression in the chestnut cold response. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3567.
67. MacGregor D.R., et al. HIGH EXPRESSION OF OSMOTICALLY RESPONSIVE GENES1 is required for circadian periodicity through the promotion of nucleo-cytoplasmic mRNA export in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:4391-4404.
68. Chow B.Y., et al. Transcriptional regulation of LUX by CBF1 mediates cold input to the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24:1518-1524.
69. Filichkin S.A., Mockler T.C. Unproductive alternative splicing and nonsense mRNAs: a widespread phenomenon among plant circadian clock genes. Biol. Direct 2012, 7:20.
70. Seo P.J., et al. A self-regulatory circuit of CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 underlies the circadian clock regulation of temperature responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2427-2442.
71. James A.B., et al. Alternative splicing mediates responses of the Arabidopsis circadian clock to temperature changes. Plant Cell 2012, 24:961-981.
72. Wang X., et al. SKIP is a component of the spliceosome linking alternative splicing and the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3278-3295.
73. Perez-Santángelo S., et al. Role for LSM genes in the regulation of circadian rhythms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:15166-15171.
74. Roden L.C., Ingle R.A. Lights, rhythms, infection: the role of light and the circadian clock in determining the outcome of plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Cell 2009, 21:2546-2552.
75. Nürnberger T., et al. Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 198:249-266.
76. Bhardwaj V., et al. Defence responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to infection by Pseudomonas syringae are regulated by the circadian clock. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e26968.
77. Jones J.D., Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
78. Wang W., et al. Timing of plant immune responses by a central circadian regulator. Nature 2011, 470:110-114.
79. Elhafez D., et al. Characterization of mitochondrial alternative NAD(P)H dehydrogenases in Arabidopsis: intraorganelle location and expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47:43-54.
80. Slusarenko A.J., Schlaich N.L. Downy mildew of Arabidopsis thaliana caused by Hyaloperonospora parasitica (formerly Peronospora parasitica). Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 4:159-170.
81. Zhang C., et al. Crosstalk between the circadian clock and innate immunity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003370.
82. Nicaise V., et al. Pseudomonas HopU1 modulates plant immune receptor levels by blocking the interaction of their mRNAs with GRP7. EMBO J. 2013, 32:701-712.
83. Molina A., et al. Differential expression of pathogen-responsive genes encoding two types of glycine-rich proteins in barley. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 33:803-810.
84. Weyman P.D., et al. A circadian rhythm-regulated tomato gene is induced by arachidonic acid and Phythophthora infestans infection. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:235-248.
85. Sauerbrunn N., Schlaich N.L. PCC1: a merging point for pathogen defence and circadian signalling in Arabidopsis. Planta 2004, 218:552-561.
86. Antico C.J., et al. Insights into the role of jasmonic acid-mediated defenses against necrotrophic and biotrophic fungal pathogens. Front. Biol. 2012, 7:48.
87. Shin J., et al. TIME FOR COFFEE represses accumulation of the MYC2 transcription factor to provide time-of-day regulation of jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2470-2482.
88. Goodspeed D., et al. Circadian control of jasmonates and salicylates: the clock role in plant defense. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8:e23123.
89. Goodspeed D., et al. Postharvest circadian entrainment enhances crop pest resistance and phytochemical cycling. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1235-1241.