Attenuation tomography beneath the Rocky mountain front: Implications for the physical state of the upper mantle

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 154, Issue , 2005, Pages 361-377

  Boyd, Oliver S ^a   Sheehan, Anne F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926278934     PISSN: 00658448     EISSN: 23288779     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/154GM27     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Al-Khatib, H.H., and B.J. Mitchell, Upper Mantle Anelasticity and Tectonic Evolution of the Western United-States from Surface-Wave Attenuation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 96 (B11), 18129-18146, 1991.
2. Allen, R.M., G. Nolet, W.J. Morgan, K. Vogfjord, B.H. Bergsson, P. Erlendsson, G.R. Foulger, S. Jakobsdottir, B.R. Julian, M. Pritchard, S. Ragnarsson, and R. Stefansson, The thin hot plume beneath iceland, Geophysical Journal International, 137, 51-63, 1999.
3. Anderson, D.L., Anelasticity, in Theory of the Earth, pp. 279-302, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, 1989.
4. Anderson, D.L., and J.W. Given, Absorption Band Q Model for the Earth, Journal of Geophysical Research, 87 (B5), 3893-3904, 1982.
5. Aranovich, L.Y., and R.G. Berman, A new gamet-orthopyroxene thermometer based on reversed A1203 solubility in Fe0-A1203-Si02 orthopyroxene, American Mineralogist, 82, 345-353, 1997.
6. Bhattacharyya, J., G. Masters, and P. Shearer, Global lateral variations of shear wave attenuation in the upper mantle, Journal of Geophysical Research, 101 (B10), 22273-22289, 1996.
7. Bina, C.R., and G.R. Helffrich, Calculation of elastic properties from ther-modynamic equation of state principles, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 20, 527-552, 1992.
8. Bromiley, G.D., and A.R. Pawley, The stability of antigorite in the systems Mg0-Si02-H20 (MSH) and Mg0-A1203-Si02-H20 (MASH): The effects of A13+ substitution on high-pressure stability, American Mineralogist, 88(1), 99-108,2003.
9. Danckwerth, A., and R.C. Newton, Experimental determination of the spinel peridotite to garnet peridotite reaction in the system Mg0-A1203-Si02 in the range 900-1 OOOo C and A1203 isopleths of enstatite in the spinel field, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 66, 189-201, 1978.
10. Decker, E.R., H.P. Heasler, K.L. Buelow, K.H. Baker, and J.S. Hallin, Significance of past and recent heat-flow and radioactivity studies in the Southern Rocky Mountain region, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 100, 1851-1885, 1988.
11. Duffy, T.S., and D.L. Anderson, Seismic Velocities in Mantle Minerals and the Mineralogy of the Upper Mantle, Journal of Geophysical Research, 94 (B2), 1895-1912, 1989.
12. Dziewonski, A.M., and D.L. Anderson, Preliminary reference Earth model, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 25, 297-356, 1981.
13. Goes, S., R. Govers, and P. Vacher, Shallow mantle temperatures under Europe from P and S wave tomography, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105 (B5), 11153-11169,2000.
14. Grand, S.P., and D. Helmberger, Upper mantle shear structure of North America, Geophysical Journal International, 76, 399-438, 1984.
15. Griffin, W.L., S.Y. O’Reilly, and C.G. Ryan, The composition and origin of sub-continental lithospheric mantle, in Mantle Petrology: Field observations and High Pressure Experimentation: A tribute to Francis R. (Joe) Boyd, edited by B.O. Mysen, pp. 13-16, The Geochemical Society, Houston, 1999.
16. Hacker, B.R., G.A. Abers, and S.M. Peacock, Subduction factory 1: Theoretical mineralogy, densities, seismic wave speeds, and H20 contents, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (B1), 2029, doi:10.1029/2001JB001127, 2003.
17. Hammond, W.C., and E.D. Humphreys, Upper mantle seismic wave attenuation: Effects of realistic partial melt distribution, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105 (B5), 10987-10999, 2000a.
18. Hammond, W.C., and E.D. Humphreys, Upper mantle seismic wave velocity: Effects of realistic partial melt geometries, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105 (B5), 10975-10986, 2000b.
19. Hessler, E.K., Upper mantle seismic structure of the Southern Rocky Mountains - Great Plains transition, M.S. thesis, University of Oregon, Eugene, 1997.
20. Holland, T.J.B., and R. Powell, An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest, Journal of Metamorphic Petrology, 16, 309-343, 1998.
21. Jackson, I., Progress in the Experimental Study of Seismic Wave Attenuation, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 21 (1), 375-406, 1993.
22. Karato, S., Importance of anelasticity in the interpretation of seismic tomography, Geophysical Research Letters, 20 (15), 1623-1626, 1993.
23. Karato, S., and H. Jung, Water, partial melting and the origin of the seismic low velocity and high attenuation zone in the upper mantle, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 157 (3-4), 193-207, 1998.
24. Karato, S., and H.A. Spetzler, Defect microdynamics in minerals and solid state mechanisms of seismic wave attenuation and velocity dispersion in the mantle, Reviews of Geophysics, 28 (4), 399-421, 1990.
25. Lay, T., and T.C. Wallace, Multiple ScS Attenuation and Travel-Times beneath Western North-America, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 78(6), 2041-2061, 1988.
26. Lee, D.-K., and S.P. Grand, Upper mantle shear structure beneath the Colorado Rocky Mountains, Journal of Geophysical Research, 101 (B10), 22233-22244, 1996.
27. Lemer-Lam, A.L., A.F. Sheehan, S.P. Grand, E. Humphreys, K.G. Dueker, E. Hessler, H. Guo, D.-K. Lee, and M.K. Savage, Deep Structure Beneath the Southern Rocky Mountains from the Rocky Mountain Front Broadband Seismic Experiment, Rocky Mountain Geology, 33 (2), 199-216, 1998.
28. Li, A., D.W. Forsyth, and K.M. Fischer, Evidence for shallow isostatic com-pensation of the southern Rocky Mountains from Rayleigh wave tomography, Geology, 30 (8), 683-686, 2002.
29. Meju, M.A., Error analysis in linear inversion, in Geophysical data analysis: Understanding inverse problem theory and practice, pp. 294, Society for Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, 1994.
30. Menke, W., Singular Value Decomposition and the Natural Generalized Inverse, in Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, pp. 119-124, Academic Press, Orlando, 1984.
31. Minster, J.B., and D.L. Anderson, A model of dislocation-controlled rheology for the mantle, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 299 (1449), 319-356, 1981.
32. Mutschler, F.E., E.E. Larson, and R.M. Bruce, Laramide and younger magmatism in Colorado - new petrologic and tectonic variations on old themes, Colorado School on Mines Quarterly, 1, 1-47, 1987.
33. Nataf, H.C., and Y. Ricard, An a priori tomographic model of the upper mantle based on geophysical modeling, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 95, 101-122, 1996.
34. Nowick, A.S., and B.S. Berry, Anelastic Relaxation in Crystalline Solids, 677 pp., Academic Press, New York, 1972.
35. Percival, D.B., and A.T. Walden, Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications: Multitaper and Conventional Univariate Techniques, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
36. Reid, F.J.L., J.H. Woodhouse, and H.J.V. Heijst, Upper mantle attenuation and velocity structure from measurements of differential S phases, Geophysical Journal International, 145, 615-630, 2001.
37. Romanowicz, B., A global tomographic model of shear attenuation in the upper mantle, Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 12375-12394, 1995.
38. Roth, E.G., D.A. Wiens, and D.P. Zhao, An empirical relationship between seismic attenuation and velocity anomalies in the upper mantle, Geophysical Research Letters, 27 (5), 601-604, 2000.
39. Sato, H., and M.P. Ryan, Generalized Upper Mantle Thermal Structure, in Magmatic Systems, edited by M.P. Ryan, pp. 259-290, Academic Press, New York, 1994.
40. Sato, K., T. Katsura, and E. Ito, Phase relations of natural phlogopite with and without enstatite up to 8 GPa: implication for mantle metasomatism, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 146, 511-526, 1997.
41. Sheehan, A.F., G.A. Abers, C.H. Jones, and A. Lemer-Lam, Crustal thickness variations across the Colorado Rocky Mountains from teleseismic receiver functions, Journal of Geophysical Research, 100 (B10), 20391-20404,1995.
42. Sheehan, A.F., and S.C. Solomon, Differential Shear Wave Attenuation and Its Lateral Variation in the North Atlantic Region, Journal of Geophysical Research, 97 (B11), 15339-15350, 1992.
43. Slack, P.D., P.M. Davis, W.S. Baldridge, K.H. Olsen, A. Glahn, U. Achauer, and W. Spence, The upper mantle structure of the central Rio Grand rift region from teleseismic P and S wave travel time delays and attenuation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 101 (B7), 16003-16023, 1996.
44. Snelson, C.M., T.J. Henstock, G.R. Keller, K.C. Miller, and A. Lavender, Crustal and uppermost mantle structure along the Deep Probe seismic line, Rocky Mountain Geology, 33 (2), 181-198, 1998.
45. Sobolev, S.B., H. Zeyen, G. Stoll, F. Werling, R. Altherr, and K. Fuchs, Upper mantle temperatures from teleseismic tomography of French Massif Central including effects of composition, mineral reactions, anharmonicity, anelasticity, and partial melt, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 139, 147-163, 1996.
46. Stacey, F.D., Thermal parameters of the Earth, in Physics of the Earth, pp. 457-460, Brookfield Press, Kenmore, Brisbane, 1992.
47. Wannamaker, P.E., J.B. Hulen, and M.T. Heizler, Early Miocene lamproite from the Colorado Plateau tectonic province, Southeastern Utah, USA, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 96, 175-190, 2000.
48. Warren, L.M., and P.M. Shearer, Investigating the frequency dependence of mantle Q by stacking P and PP spectra, Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth, 105 (B11), 25391-25402, 2000.