Tolerance of macaque middle STS body patch neurons to shape-preserving stimulus transformations

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1001-1016

  Popivanov, Ivo D ^a   Jastorff, Jan ^a   Vanduffel, Wim ^a,b,c   Vogels, Rufin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY PATCH NEURON; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MONKEY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; ORGAN SIZE; ORIENTATION; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RHESUS MONKEY; ROTATION; STIMULUS; TUNING CURVE; VISUAL FIELD; ACTION POTENTIAL; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ATTENTION; BLOOD; BRAIN MAPPING; CYTOLOGY; EYE MOVEMENT; FACE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPORAL LOBE; VASCULARIZATION;

OXYGEN;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; EYE MOVEMENTS; FACE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MACACA MULATTA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; OXYGEN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84926199982     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00762     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ashbridge, E., Perrett, D. I., Oram, M. W., & Jellema, T. (2000). Effect of image orientation and size on object recognition: Responses of single units in the macaque monkey temporal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 13-34.
2. Bell, A. H., Hadj-Bouziane, F., Frihauf, J. B., Tootell, R. B., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2009). Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 688-700.
3. Boussaoud, D., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1991). Visual topography of area TEO in the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 306, 554-575.
4. Brincat, S. L., & Connor, C. E. (2004). Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 880-886.
5. Chan, A. W. Y., Kravitz, D. J., Truong, S., Arizpe, J., & Baker, C. I. (2010). Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in commonly experienced configurations. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 417-418.
6. Cook, R., & Duchaine, B. (2011). A look at how we look at others: Orientation inversion and photographic negation disrupt the perception of human bodies. Visual Cognition, 19, 445-468.
7. Dakin, S. C., & Watt, R. J. (2009). Biological "bar codes" in human faces. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-10.
8. Delorme, A., Richard, G., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2000). Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: A study in monkeys and humans. Vision Research, 40, 2187-2200.
9. Dicarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D., & Rust, N. C. (2012). How does the brain solve visual object recognition? Neuron, 73, 415-434.
10. Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470-2473.
11. Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
12. Freiwald, W. A., & Tsao, D. Y. (2010). Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system. Science, 330, 845-851.
13. Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2009). A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1187-1196.
14. Goris, R. L. T., & Op de Beeck, H. P. (2009). Neural representations that support invariant object recognition. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 3, 1-16.
15. Hikosaka, K. (1998). Representation of foveal visual fields in the ventral bank of the superior temporal sulcus in the posterior inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Behavioural Brain Research, 96, 101-113.
16. Huth, A. G., Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., & Gallant, J. L. (2012). A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain. Neuron, 76, 1210-1224.
17. Issa, E. B., & Dicarlo, J. J. (2012). Precedence of the eye region in neural processing of faces. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 16666-16682.
18. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
19. Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., & Vogels, R. (2003). Shape tuning in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3016-3027.
20. Koteles, K., De Maziere, P. A., Van Hulle, M., Orban, G. A., & Vogels, R. (2008). Coding of images of materials by macaque inferior temporal cortical neurons. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 466-482.
21. Li, N., Cox, D. D., Zoccolan, D., & Dicarlo, J. J. (2009). What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition? Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 360-376.
22. Minnebusch, D. A., Keune, P. M., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2010). Gradual inversion affects the processing of human body shapes. Neuroimage, 49, 2746-2755.
23. Missal, M., Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1997). Responses of macaque inferior temporal neurons to overlapping shapes. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 758-767.
24. Mysore, S. G., Vogels, R., Raiguel, S. E., Todd, J. T., & Orban, G. A. (2010). The selectivity of neurons in the macaquefundus of the superior temporal area for three-dimensional structure from motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 15491-15508.
25. Ohayon, S., Freiwald, W. A., & Tsao, D. Y. (2012). What makes a cell face selective? The importance of contrast. Neuron, 74, 567-581.
26. Op de Beeck, H., & Vogels, R. (2000). Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 426, 505-518.
27. Op de Beeck, H.,Wagemans, J.,&Vogels, R. (2001). Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1244-1252.
28. Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 636-648.
29. Pinsk, M. A., Arcaro, M., Weiner, K. S., Kalkus, J. F., Inati, S. J., Gross, C. G., et al. (2009). Neural representations of faces and body parts in macaque and human cortex: A comparative fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 2581-2600.
30. Pinsk, M. A., DeSimone, K., Moore, T., Gross, C. G., & Kastner, S. (2005). Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex: A functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 102, 6996-7001.
31. Popivanov, I. D., Jastorff, J., Vanduffel, W., & Vogels, R. (2012). Stimulus representations in body-selective regions of the macaque cortex assessed with event-related fMRI. Neuroimage, 63, 723-741.
32. Popivanov, I. D., Jastorff, J., Vanduffel, W., & Vogels, R. (2014). Heterogeneous single-unit selectivity in an fMRI-defined body-selective patch. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 95-111.
33. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14, 302-308.
34. Sary, G., Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1993). Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. Science, 260, 995-997.
35. Sawamura, H., Orban, G. A., & Vogels, R. (2006). Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron, 49, 307-318.
36. Schwarzlose, R. F., Swisher, J. D., Dang, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2008). The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 105, 4447-4452.
37. Shepherd, S. V., Steckenfinger, S. A., Hasson, U., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2010). Human-monkey gaze correlations reveal convergent and divergent patterns of movie viewing. Current Biology, 20, 649-656.
38. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139.
39. Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Knutsen, T. A., Mandeville, J. B., & Tootell, R. B. (2003). Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 989-995.
40. Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B., & Livingstone, M. S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311, 670-674.
41. Vogels, R., & Biederman, I. (2002). Effects of illumination intensity and direction on object coding in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 756-766.
42. Vogels, R., & Orban, G. A. (1996). Coding of stimulus invariances by inferior temporal neurons. Progress in Brain Research, 112, 195-211.
43. Waitt, C., Gerald, M. S., Little, A. C., & Kraiselburd, E. (2006). Selective attention toward female secondary sexual color in male rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 68, 738-744.
44. Yue, X. M., Nasr, S., Devaney, K. J., Holt, D. J., & Tootell, R. B. H. (2013). fMRI analysis of contrast polarity in face-selective cortex in humans and monkeys. Neuroimage, 76, 57-69.
45. Yun, K., Peng, Y. F., Samaras, D., Zelinsky, G. J., & Berg, T. L. (2013). Exploring the role of gaze behavior and object detection in scene understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-14.