A look at how we look at others: Orientation inversion and photographic negation disrupt the perception of human bodies

Visual Cognition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 445-468

  Cook, Richard ^a   Duchaine, Bradley ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Dartmouth College ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Bodies; Faces; Inversion; Negation; Physical attractiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 79957593440     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2010.541892     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abbas, Z. A., & Duchaine, B. (2008). The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness. Perception, 37(8), 1187-1196.
2. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551-565.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115-147.
4. Brandman, T., & Yovel, G. (2010). The body inversion effect is mediated by face-selective, not body-selective, mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(31), 10534-10540.
5. Bruce, V. (1988). Recognising faces. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
6. Bruce, V., & Langton, S. (1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception, 23(7), 803-822.
7. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77(3), 305-327.
8. Busigny, T., & Rossion, B. (2010). Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect. Cortex, 46(8), 965-981.
9. Bäuml, K. H. (1994). Upright versus upside-down faces: How interface attractiveness varies with orientation. Perception and Psychophysics, 56(2), 163-172.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Dakin, S. C., & Watt, R. J. (2009). Biological "bar codes" in human faces. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 1-10.
12. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(2), 107-117.
13. Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y. H., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293(5539), 2470-2473.
14. Duchaine, B., Yovel, G., Butterworth, E., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(5), 714-747.
15. Fan, J. T., Dai, W., Liu, F., & Wu, J. (2005). Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 272B(1560), 219-226.
16. Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Matts, P. J. (2006). Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 433-442.
17. Fleming, R. W., Dror, R. O., & Adelson, E. H. (2003). Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision, 3(5), 347-368.
18. Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2009). A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12(9), 1187-1196.
19. Galper, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19(4), 207-208.
20. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a "greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37(12), 1673-1682.
21. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(3), 495-504.
22. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 223-233.
23. Hill, H., & Bruce, V. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22(4), 986-1004.
24. Johnston, A., Hill, H., & Carman, N. (1992). Recognising faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception, 21(3), 365-375.
25. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 759-763.
26. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-4311.
27. Kemp, R., McManus, C., & Pigott, T. (1990). Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Perception, 19(4), 531-543.
28. Kemp, R., Pike, G., White, P., & Musselman, A. (1996). Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception, 25(1), 37-52.
29. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115-121.
30. Lewis, M. B., & Johnston, R. A. (1997). The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption. Perception, 26(2), 225-227.
31. Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., & Leinster, S. J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(4), 223-236.
32. McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., & Duchaine, B. C. (2007). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 8-15.
33. Moro, V., Urgesi, C., Pernigo, S., Lanteri, P., Pazzaglia, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008). The neural basis of body form and body action agnosia. Neuron, 60(2), 235-246.
34. Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 555-604.
35. Nederhouser, M., Yue, X., Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2007). The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects. Vision Research, 47(16), 2134-2142.
36. Peelen, M. V., & Downing, P. E. (2005). Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93(1), 603-608.
37. Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(5), 295-307.
38. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394(6696), 884-887.
39. Pitcher, D., Charles, L., Devlin, J. T., Walsh, V., & Duchaine, B. (2009). Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex. Current Biology, 19(4), 319-324.
40. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14(4), 302-308.
41. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Grubb, J. D., & McGoldrick, J. E. (2006). Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 73-87.
42. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., & McGoldrick, J. E. (2005). Not just posturing: Configural processing of the human body. In G. Knoblich, I. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.) Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 229-258). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43. Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 103(1), 34-79.
44. Russell, R., Sinha, P., Biederman, I., & Nederhouser, M. (2006). Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception, 35(6), 749-759.
45. Santos, I. M., & Young, A. W. (2008). Effects of inversion and negation on social inferences from faces. Perception, 37(7), 1061-1078.
46. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness*role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293-307.
47. Slaughter, V., Stone, V. E., & Reed, C. (2004). Perception of faces and bodies-similar or different? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 219-223.
48. Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovee, M. J. (2007). Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(1), 48-54.
49. Stekelenburg, J. J., & de Gelder, B. (2004). The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: An ERP study on the body-inversion effect. Neuroreport, 15(5), 777-780.
50. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2005). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A crosscultural study. Body Image, 2(4), 383-393.
51. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(2), 225-245.
52. Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 764-769.
53. Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B., & Livingstone, M. S. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311(5761), 670-674.
54. Voracek, M., Fisher, M. L., Rupp, B., Lucas, D., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2007). Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: Relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(3), 1123-1138.
55. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141-145.
56. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747-759.
57. Yovel, G., Pelc, T., & Lubetzky, I. (2010). It's all in your head: Why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 759-767.