Gradual inversion affects the processing of human body shapes

NeuroImage

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 2746-2755

  Minnebusch, Denise A ^a   Keune, Philipp M ^a   Suchan, Boris ^a   Daum, Irene ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BODY BUILD; BODY POSITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORY STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; POSTURE;

EID: 71849105727     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.046     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., and McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 (1996) 551-565
2. Collishaw S.M., and Hole G.J. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception 29 (2000) 893-909
3. Collishaw S.M., and Hole G.J. Is there a linear or a non-linear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?. Perception 31 (2002) 287-296
4. Cox D., Meyers E., and Sinha P. Contextually evoked object-specific responses in human visual cortex. Science 304 (2004) 115-117
5. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 115 (1986) 107-117
6. Downing P.E., Jiang Y., Shuman M., and Kanwisher N. A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293 (2001) 2470-2473
7. Downing P.E., Wiggett A.J., and Peelen M.V. Functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of overlapping lateral occipitotemporal activations using multi-voxel pattern analysis. J. Neurosci. 27 (2007) 226-233
8. Eimer M. Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 10 (2000) 145-158
9. Eimer M. The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport 11 (2000) 2319-2324
10. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., and Anderson A.W. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J. Cogn Neurosci. 12 (2000) 495-504
11. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., and Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 223-233
12. Herrmann M.J., Ehlis A.C., Muehlberger A., and Fallgatter A.J. Source localization of early stages of face processing. Brain Topogr. 18 (2005) 77-85
13. Husk J.S., Bennett P.J., and Sekuler A.B. Inverting houses and textures: investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects. Vision Res. 47 (2007) 3350-3359
14. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs. Neuroimage 21 (2004) 1518-1532
15. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 487-502
16. Itier R.J., and Taylor M.J. N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb. Cortex 14 (2004) 132-142
17. Jacques C., and Rossion B. Early electrophysiological responses to multiple face orientations correlate with individual discrimination performance in humans. Neuroimage 36 (2007) 863-876
18. Jemel B., Schuller A.M., Cheref-Khan Y., Goffaux V., Crommelinck M., and Bruyer R. Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component. Neuroreport 14 (2003) 2035-2039
19. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17 (1997) 4302-4311
20. Kanwisher N., Tong F., and Nakayama K. The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition 68 (1998) B1-11
21. Kanwisher N., and Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 361 (2006) 2109-2128
22. Kovacs G., Zimmer M., Banko E., Harza I., Antal A., and Vidnyanszky Z. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cereb. Cortex 16 (2006) 742-753
23. Leder H., and Bruce V. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 53 (2000) 513-536
24. Mangun G.R. Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 32 (1995) 4-18
25. Maurer D., Grand R.L., and Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 255-260
26. Minnebusch D.A., Suchan B., Ramon M., and Daum I. Event-related potentials reflect heterogeneity of developmental prosopagnosia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25 (2007) 2234-2247
27. Minnebusch D.A., Suchan B., and Daum I. Losing your head: behavioral and electrophysiological effects of body inversion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 (2009) 865-874
28. Morris J.P., Pelphrey K.A., and McCarthy G. Occipitotemporal activation evoked by the perception of human bodies is modulated by the presence or absence of the face. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 1919-1927
29. Peelen M.V., and Downing P.E. Selectivity for the human body in the fusiform gyrus. J. Neurophysiol. 93 (2005) 603-608
30. Peelen M.V., and Downing P.E. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8 (2007) 636-648
31. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., Bozova S., and Tanaka J. The body-inversion effect. Psychol. Sci. 14 (2003) 302-308
32. Reed C.L., Stone V.E., Grubb J.D., and McGoldrick J.E. Turning configural processing upside down: part and whole body postures. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32 (2006) 73-87
33. Riesenhuber M., Jarudi I., Gilad S., and Sinha P. Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proc.Biol. Sci. 271 Suppl. 6 (2004) 448-450
34. Righart R., and De Gelder B. Impaired face and body perception in developmental prosopagnosia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 104 (2007) 17234-17238
35. Rossion B. Picture-plan inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychol. 128 (2008) 274-289
36. Rossion B., and Boremanse A. Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion. J. Vis. 8 (2008) 3.1-3.13
37. Rossion B., and Gauthier I. How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 1 (2002) 63-75
38. Rossion B., and Jacques C. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. Neuroimage 15 (2008) 1959-7979
39. Rossion B., Delvenne J.F., Debatisse D., Goffaux V., Bruyer R., Crommelinck M., and Guerit J.M. Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study. Biol. Psychol. 50 (1999) 173-189
40. Rossion B., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Despland P., Bruyer R., Linotte S., and Crommelinck M. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 11 (2000) 69-74
41. Schwarzlose R.F., Baker C.I., and Kanwisher N. Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. J. Neurosci. 25 (2005) 11055-11059
42. Sekuler A.B., Gasper C.M., Gold J.M., and Bennett P.J. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 391-396
43. Stekelenburg J.J., and De Gelder B. The neural correlates of perceiving human bodies: an ERP study on the body-inversion effect. Neuroreport 15 (2004) 777-780
44. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 46 (1993) 225-245
45. Tarkiainen A., Cornelissen P.L., and Salmelin R. Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Brain 125 (2002) 1125-1136
46. Taylor J.C., Wiggett A.J., and Downing P.E. fMRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. J. Neurophysiol. 98 (2007) 1626-1633
47. Taylor M.J., Batty M., and Itier R.J. The faces of development: a review of early face processing over childhood. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 1426-1442
48. Thierry G., Pegna A.J., Dodds C., Roberts M., Basan S., and Downing P. An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. Neuroimage 32 (2006) 871-879
49. Tsao D.Y., and Livingstone M.S. Mechanisms of face perception. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31 (2008) 411-437
50. Varga A.C. Declaration of Helsinki (Adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly in Helsinki, Finland, and revised by the 29th World Medical Assembly in Tokyo, 1975). The Main Issue in Bioethics, revised edition (1975), Paulist Press, New York 1984
51. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81 (1969) 141-145
52. Yin R.K. Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability?. Neuropsychologia 8 (1970) 395-402
53. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 44 (2004) 889-898
54. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 2256-2262
55. Yovel G., Pelc T., and Lubezky I. It's all in your head: why is the body inversion effect abolished for headless bodies?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 9 (2009) 460a