Powder cocaine and crack use in the United States: An examination of risk for arrest and socioeconomic disparities in use

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 149, Issue , 2015, Pages 108-116

  Palamar, Joseph J ^a,b,c   Davies, Shelby ^a   Ompad, Danielle C ^b,c,d   Cleland, Charles M ^b   Weitzman, Michael ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arrest; Cocaine; Crack; Disparities; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; POWDER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLACK PERSON; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DETENTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; CAUCASIAN; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CRIME; MIDDLE AGED; POWDER; RISK; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; CRACK COCAINE; CRIME; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INCOME; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POWDERS; RISK; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926168254     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. American Civil Liberties Union The War on Marijuana in Black and White. New York, NY 2013, Available from: https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/war-marijuana-black-and-white-report (accessed 07.16.14).
2. Beaver A.L. Getting a fix on cocaine sentencing policy: reforming the sentencing scheme of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986. Fordham Law Rev. 2010, 78:2530-2574.
3. Blumstein J.E. The notorious 100:1 crack:powder disparity - The data tell us that it is time to restore the balance. Federal Sentencing Reporter 2003, 16:87-92.
4. Caulkins J.P. Is crack cheaper than (powder) cocaine?. Addiction 1997, 92:1437-1443.
5. Chatterji P. Illicit drug use and educational attainment. Health Econ. 2006, 15:489-511.
6. Chen C.Y., Anthony J.C. Epidemiological estimates of risk in the process of becoming dependent upon cocaine: cocaine hydrochloride powder versus crack cocaine. Psychopharmacology 2004, 172:78-86.
7. Chen K., Kandel D. Relationship between extent of cocaine use and dependence among adolescents and adults in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002, 68:65-85.
8. Compton W.M., Cottler L.B., Ben Abdallah A., Phelps D.L., Spitznagel E.L., Horton J.C. Substance dependence and other psychiatric disorders among drug dependent subjects: race and gender correlates. Am. J. Addict. 2000, 9:113-125.
9. Cross J.C., Johnson B.D., Davis W.R., Liberty H.J. Supporting the habit: income generation activities of frequent crack users compared with frequent users of other hard drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001, 64:191-201.
10. Ditton J., Farrow K., Forsyth A., Hammersley R., Hunter G., Lavelle T., Mullen K., Smith I., Davies J., Henderson M. Scottish cocaine users: wealthy snorters or delinquent smokers?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1991, 28:269-276.
11. Drug Policy Alliance Race and the Drug War: Racial Discrimination in Drug Law Enforcement 2014, Available from: www.drugpolicy.org/race-and-drug-war (accessed 07.16.14).
12. Fair Sentencing Act Public Law 111-220, 111th Congress 2010, Available from:, (accessed 07.16.14). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ220/pdf/PLAW-111publ220.pdf.
13. Gfroerer J.C., Larson S.L., Colliver J.D. Epidemiology and etiology of drug abuse: drug use patterns and trends in rural communities. J. Rural Health 2007, 23:S10-S15.
14. Golub A., Johnson B.D., Dunlap E. The race/ethnicity disparity in misdemeanor marijuana arrests in New York City. Criminol. Public Policy 2007, 6:131-164.
15. Grinspoon L., Bakalar J.B. Cocaine: A Drug and its Social Evolution 1985, Basic Books, New York.
16. Harder V.S., Chilcoat H.D. Cocaine use and educational achievement: understanding a changing association over the past 2 decades. Am. J. Public Health 2007, 97:1790-1793.
17. Hatsukami D.K., Fischman M.W. Crack cocaine and cocaine hydrochloride: are the differences myth or reality?. JAMA 1996, 276:1580-1588.
18. Heeringa S.G., West B.T., Beglund P.A. Applied Survey Data Analysis 2010, Chapman & Hall, London.
19. Johnson B.D., Golub A., Dunlap E., Sifaneck S.J. An analysis of alternatives to New York City's current marijuana arrest and detention policy. Policing 2008, 31:226-250.
20. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Schulenberg J.E. Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper Series: Demographic Subgroup Trends For Various Licit And Illicit Drugs, 1975-2011 2012, The Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Available from: http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/occpapers/mtf-occ77.pdf (accessed 07.16.14).
21. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G., Schulenberg J.E. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2012: Volume 2, College Students and Adults Ages 19-50 2013, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Available from: http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-vol2_2012.pdf (accessed 07.16.14).
22. Kasperski S.J., Vincent K.B., Caldeira K.M., Garnier-Dykstra L.M., O'Grady K.E., Arria A.M. College students' use of cocaine: results from a longitudinal study. Addict. Behav. 2011, 36:408-411.
23. Kleiman M.A.R., Caulkins J.P., Hawken A. Drugs and Drug Policy: What Everyone Needs to Know 2011, Oxford University Press, New York.
24. Leigey M.E., Bachman R. The influence of crack cocaine on the likelihood of incarceration for a violent offense: An examination of a prison sample. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 2007, 18:335-352.
25. Link B.G., Phelan J. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J. Health Soc. Behav. Spec. 1995, 35:80-94.
26. Lowney K.D. Smoked not snorted: is racism inherent in our crack cocaine laws?. Wash. Univ. J. Urban Contemp. Law 1994, 45.
27. Martin B.A., McCoy T.P., Champion H., Parries M.T., Durant R.H., Mitra A., Rhodes S.D. The role of monthly spending money in college student drinking behaviors and their consequences. J. Am. Coll. Health 2009, 57:587-596.
28. Merline A.C., O'Malley P.M., Schulenberg J.E., Bachman J.G., Johnston L.D. Substance use among adults 35 years of age: prevalence, adulthood predictors, and impact of adolescent substance use. Am. J. Public Health 2004, 94:96-102.
29. Miech R.A., Chilcoat H., Harder V.S. The increase in the association of education and cocaine use over the 1980s and 1990s: evidence for a 'historical period' effect. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005, 79:311-320.
30. Musto D.F. The American Disease: Origins of Narcotic Control 1999, Oxford University Press, New York.
31. National Institute on Drug Abuse What is the Scope of Cocaine Use in the United States? The Science of Drug Abuse & Addiction 2010, NIDA, Bethesda, Available from:, (accessed 07.16.14). http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/cocaine/what-scope-cocaine-use-in-united-states.
32. National Institute of Drug Abuse Drug Facts: Cocaine 2014, NIDA, Bethesda, MD, Available from: http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/cocaine (accessed 07.15.14).
33. Palamar J.J., Ompad D.C. Demographic and socioeconomic correlates of powder cocaine and crack use among high school seniors in the United States. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014, 40:37-43.
34. Petronis K.R., Anthony J.C. A different kind of contextual effect: geographic clustering of cocaine incidence in the USA. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2003, 57:893-900.
35. Pope S.K., Falck R.S., Carlson R.G., Leukefeld C., Booth B.M. Characteristics of rural crack and powder cocaine use: gender and other correlates. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2011, 37:491-496.
36. Ramchand R., Pacula R.L., Iguchi M.Y. Racial differences in marijuana-users' risk of arrest in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006, 84:264-272.
37. Scott, R., 2013. H.R.2372: Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2013. 113th Congress, 1rst Session. United States House of Representatives. Washington, DC (accessed 07.16.14).
38. Scragg, R., Laugesen, M., Robinson, E., 2002. Cigarette smoking, pocket money and socioeconomic status: results from a national survey of 4th form students in 2000. N. Z. Med. J. 115, U108.
39. Smart R.G. Crack cocaine use: a review of prevalence and adverse effects. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1991, 17:13-26.
40. Smarter Sentencing Act (S.1410) Families Against Mandatory Minimums 2014, Available at:, (accessed 07.08.14). http://famm.org/s-1410-the-smarter-sentencing-act/.
41. Spillane J.F. Debating the Controlled Substances Act. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004, 76:17-29.
42. Spohn C. The effects of the offender's race, ethnicity, and sex on federal sentencing outcomes in the guidelines era. Law Contemp. Prob. 2013, 76:75-104.
43. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software: Release13. 0 2013, StataCorp, College Station, TX.
44. Sterk C.E., Elifson K.W., DePadilla L. Neighbourhood structural characteristics and crack cocaine use: exploring the impact of perceived neighbourhood disorder on use among African Americans. Int. J. Drug Policy 2013, 25:616-623.
45. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration The DAWN Report: Highlights of the 2011 Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Findings on Drug-Related Emergency Department Visits 2013, SAMHSA, Rockville, MD, (accessed 07.16.14).
46. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings 2013, HHS Publication SMA 13-4795, Rockville, MD, (accessed 07.16.14).
47. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed tables 2013, SAMHSA, Rockville, MD, (accessed 11.20.14).
48. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings 2008, SAMHSA, Rockville, MD. HHS publication SMA 08-4343, (accessed 07.16.14).
49. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration The NSDUH report: Substance Use among Black Adults 2010, SAMHSA, Rockville, MD, Available from: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k10/174/174SubUseBlackAdults.htm (accessed 07.16.14).
50. United States Department of Justice Office of the Pardon Attorney. Federal Statutes Imposing Collateral Consequences upon Conviction 2013, Available from:, (accessed 06.03.13). http://www.justice.gov/pardon/collateral_consequences.pdf.
51. United States Government Accountability Office Drug Offenders: Various Factors May Limit the Impacts of Federal Laws that Provide for Denial of Selected Benefits. GAO-05-238 2005, Available from:, (accessed 06.03.13). http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05238.pdf.
52. United States Government Accountability Office Child Welfare: More Information and Collaboration Could Promote Ties Between Foster Care Children and Their Incarcerated Parents. GAO-11-863 2011, Available from: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-863 (accessed 07.09.14).
53. United States Government Accountability Office Bureau of Prisons: Eligibility and Capacity Impact Use of Flexibilities to Reduce Inmates' Time in Prison. GAO-12-320 2012, Available from: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-320 (accessed 07.08.14).
54. United States Government Accountability Office Bureau of Prisons: Growing Inmate Crowding Negatively Affects Inmates, Staff, and Infrastructure, GAO-12-743 2012, Available from: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-743 (accessed 07.09.14).
55. United States Sentencing Commission, 1995. Special Report to Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC.
56. United States Sentencing Commission, 2011. Report to the Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC.
57. United States Sentencing Commission. Chapter 6: Report on Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy. The National Legislative and Law Enforcement Response to Cocaine. Office of Public Affairs: One Columbus Circle, NE, Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.ussc.gov/report-cocaine-and-federal-sentencing-policy-2 (accessed 07.16.14a).
58. United States Sentencing Commission, 2014b. Quick Facts: Crack Cocaine Trafficking Offenses. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/quick-facts/Quick_Facts_Crack_Cocaine.pdf (accessed 07.16.14).
59. Vagins, D.J., McCurdy, J., 2006. Cracks in the System: Twenty Years of the Unjust Federal Crack Cocaine Law. The American Civil Liberties Union. Washington, DC. Available at: www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/drugpolicy/cracksinsystem_20061025.pdf (accessed 07.16.14).
60. Vaughn M.G., Fu Q., Perron B.E., Bohnert A.S., Howard M.O. Is crack cocaine use associated with greater violence than powdered cocaine use? Results from a national sample. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2010, 36:181-186.
61. Wallace B.C. Crack, policy, and advocacy: a case analysis illustrating the need to monitor emergent public health-related policy and engage in persistent evidence-based advocacy. J. Equity Health 2014, 3:139-160.
62. Washton A.M., Gold M.S. Chronic cocaine abuse: evidence for adverse effects on health and functioning. Psychiatr. Ann. 1984, 14:733-743.
63. Williams C.T., Latkin C.A. Neighborhood socioeconomic status, personal network attributes, and use of heroin and cocaine. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 32:S203-S210.
64. Zhang B., Cartmill C., Ferrence R. The role of spending money and drinking alcohol in adolescent smoking. Addiction 2008, 103:310-319.