Cocaine use and educational achievement: Understanding a changing association over the past 2 decades

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1790-1793

  Harder, Valerie S ^a   Chilcoat, Howard D ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; UNITED STATES; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ADULT; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34948843517     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.091108     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abelson HI, Miller, JD. A decade of trends in cocaine use in the household population. In: Kozel NJ and Adams EH, eds. Cocaine Use in America: Epidemiologic and Clinical Perspectives. NIDA Research Monograph 61, DHHS No. (ADM) 85-1414. 1985;35-49.
2. Anthony JC. Epidemiological research on cocaine use in the USA. Ciba Found Symp. 1992;166:20-33.
3. Trinkoff AM, Ritter C, Anthony JC. The prevalence and self-reported consequences of cocaine use: an exploratory and descriptive analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;26:217-225.
4. Bachman J, O'Malley P, Schulenberg J, Johnston L, Bryant A, Merline A. The decline of substance use in young adulthood: Changes in social activities, roles, and beliefs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2002.
5. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2003. Volume I: Secondary school students. Bethesda, Md; National Institutes of Health; 2004. NIH Publication No. 04-5507.
6. Chatterji P. Illicit drug use and educational attainment. Health Econ. 2006;15:489-511.
7. Goodman E, Huang B. Socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms, and adolescent substance use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:448-453.
8. Miech RA, Chilcoat H, Harder VS. The increase in the association of education and cocaine use over the 1980s and 1990s: evidence for a "historical period" effect. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79:311-320.
9. Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB. Cocaine: A Drug and Its Social Evolution. Rev. ed. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc; 1985.
10. Johnson BD. The crack era in New York City. Addict Recovery. 1991:24-27.
11. Johnson BD, Lewis C, Golub A. Crack onset in the 1980s in New York City. In: Vamos P, Corriveau PJ, eds. Drugs and Society to the Year 2000; Proceedings of the XIV World Congress of Therapeutic Communities. Montreal, Canada: Portage Program for Drug Dependencies, Inc. 1992;365-369.
12. Cornish JW, O'Brien CP. Crack cocaine abuse: an epidemic with many public health consequences. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:259-273.
13. Cohn V. Crack use. NIDA Notes. 1986;4:6-7.
14. Fagan J, Chin K. Initiation into crack and cocaine: A tale of two epidemics. Contemp Drug Probl. 1989;16:579-617.
15. Hamid A. The political economy of crack-related violence. Contemp Drug Probl. 1990;17:31-79.
16. Williams T. Crackhouse: Notes From the End of the Line. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co; 1992.
17. Waldorf D, Reinarman C, Murphy S. Cocaine Changes: The Experience of Using and Quitting. Philadelphia, Pa: Temple University Press; 1991.
18. Bachman JG, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM. Explaining the recent decline in cocaine use among young adults: further evidence that perceived risks and disapproval lead to reduced drug use. J Health Soc Behav. 1990;31:173-184.
19. Chen CY, Anthony JC. Possible age-associated bias in reporting of clinical features of drug dependence: epidemiological evidence on adolescent-onset marijuana use. Addiction. 2003;98:71-82.
20. Chen CY, Anthony JC. Epidemiological estimates of risk in the process of becoming dependent upon cocaine: cocaine hydrochloride powder versus crack cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;172:78-86.
21. Storr CL, Zhou H, Liang KY, Anthony JC. Empirically derived latent classes of tobacco dependence syndromes observed in recent-onset tobacco smokers: epidemiological evidence from a national probability sample survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:533-545.
22. Anthony JC, Petronis K. Early-onset drug use and risk of later drug problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;40:9-15.
23. O'Brien MS, Anthony JC. Risk of becoming cocaine dependent: epidemiological estimates for the United States, 2000-2001. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:1006-1018.
24. Chen CY, O'Brien MS, Anthony JC. Who becomes cannabis dependent soon after onset of use? Epidemiological evidence from the United States: 2000-2001. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79:11-22.
25. Hastie TJ. Generalized additive models. In: Chambers JM and Hastie TJ, eds. Statistical Models in S. Pacific Grove, Calif: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole; 1991:249-307.
26. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. Generalized Additive Models. London, England: Chapman and Hall; 1994.
27. National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1979. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services; 1980. DHHS publication 976.
28. National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1982. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services; 1983. DHHS publication 1263.
29. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1985. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1988. DHHS publication 1586.
30. National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1988. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services; 1990. DHHS publication 1682.
31. National Institute on Drug Abuse. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1990. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services; 1991. DHHS publication 1788.
32. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1991. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1993. DHHS publication SMA 93-1980.
33. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1992. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1995. DHHS publication SMA 94-3012.
34. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1993. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1995. DHHS publication SMA 95-3020.
35. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1994. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1996. DHHS publication SMA 96-3085.
36. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1995. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1997. DHHS publication SMA 97-3127.
37. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1996. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1998. DHHS publication SMA 98-3200.
38. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1997. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 1998. DHHS publication SMA 98-3250.
39. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1998. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. DHHS publication SMA 00-3381.
40. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1999. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 2000. DHHS publication SMA 00-3466.
41. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 2000. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 2001. DHHS publication SMA 00-3642.
42. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 2001. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 2002. DHHS publication SMA 00-3381.
43. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 2002. Rockville, Md: Office of Applied Studies, Department of Health and Human Services; 2003. DHHS publication SMA 00-3381.
44. Biemer PP, Wiesen C. Measurement error evaluation of self-reported drug use: a latent class analysis of the US National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. J R Statist Soc A. 2002;165:97-119.
45. Harrison L, Hughes A. The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates. Rockville, Md: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1997.
46. Link BG, Phelan J. Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav. 1995;Spec No: 80-94.
47. Ernster V. Trends in smoking, cancer risk, and cigarette promotion. Cancer. 1988;62:1702-1712.
48. Novotny TE, Warner KE, Kendrick JS, Remington P. Smoking by blacks and whites: Socioeconomic and demographic differences. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:1187-1189.
49. Beaglehole R. International trends in coronary heart disease mortality, morbidity, and risk factors. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:1-16.