Applied speech and audio processing: With matlab ® examples

Applied Speech and Audio Processing: With Matlab Examples

Volumn 9780521519540, Issue , 2009, Pages 1-206

  McLoughlin, Ian ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; AUDIO SYSTEMS; AUDITION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH; STUDENTS;

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; AUDIO PROCESSING; GRADUATE STUDENTS; HEARING RESEARCHES; ONE STOP; SPEECH SIGNAL PROCESSING;

AUDIO SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 84926154764     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609640     Document Type: Book

References (86)

1. S. W. Smith. Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Guide for Engineers and Scientists. Newnes, 2000. URL www.dspguide.com.
2. J.W. Gibbs. Fourier series. Nature, 59: 606, 1899.
3. R. W. Schaefer and L. R. Rabiner. Digital representation of speech signals. Proc. IEEE, 63(4): 662–677, 1975.
4. B. P. Bogert, M. J. R. Healy, and J. W Tukey. The quefrency analysis of time series for echoes: Cepstrum, pseudo-autocovariance, cross-cepstrum and saphe cracking. In M. Rosenblatt, editor, Proceedings of the Symposium on Time-Series Analysis, pages 209–243. JohnWiley, 1963.
5. D. G. Childers, D. P. Skinner, and R. C. Kemerait. The cepstrum: A guide to processing. Proc. IEEE, 65(10): 1428–1443, 1977.
6. F. Zheng, G. Zhang, and Z. Song. Comparison of different implementations of MFCC. J. Computer Sci. and Technol., 16(6): 582–589, 2001.
7. J. Barkera and M. Cooke. Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending? Speech Comm., 27(3-4): 159–174, 1999.
8. M. R. Schroeder, B.S. Atal, and J.L. Hall. Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 66(6): 1647–1652, 1979.
9. I. Witten. Principles of Computer Speech. Academic Press, 1982.
10. B. C. J. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Academic Press, 1992.
11. I. B. Thomas. The influence of first and second formants on the intelligibility of clipped speech. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 16: 182–185, 1968.
12. J. Pickett. The Sounds of Speech Communication. Allyn and Bacon, 1980.
13. Z. Li, E. C. Tan, I. McLoughlin, and T. T. Teo. Proposal of standards for intelligibility tests of Chinese speech. IEE Proc. Vision Image Sig. Proc., 147(3): 254–260, 2000.
14. F. L. Chong, I. McLoughlin, and K. Pawlikowski. A methodology for improving PESQ accuracy for Chinese speech. In Proc. IEEE TENCON, Melbourne, November 2005.
15. K. Kryter. The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise. Academic Press, 1994.
16. L. L. Beranek. The design of speech communications systems. Proc. IRE, pages 880–890, 1947.
17. W. Tempest, editor. The Noise Handbook. Academic Press, 1985.
18. M. Mourjopoulos, J. Tsoukalas, and D. Paraskevas. Speech enhancement using psychoacoustic criteria. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 359–362, 1991.
19. F. White. Our Acoustic Environment. JohnWiley, 1976.
20. P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell, and G. M. Clark. Acoustic parameters measured by a formant estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 82(1): 38–47, 1987.
21. R. W. Schaefer and L. R. Rabiner. Digital representation of speech signals. Proc. IEEE, 63(4): 662–677, 1975.
22. A. D. Sharpley. Dynastat webpages, 1996–2006. URL http://www.dynastat.com/Speech Intelligibility.htm.
23. S. F. Boll. Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech Signal Proc., 27(2): 113–120, 1979.
24. R. E. P. Dowling and L. F. Turner. Modelling the detectability of changes in auditory signals. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 1 pages 133–136, 1993.
25. J. I. Alcantera, G. J. Dooley, P. J. Blamey, and P. M. Seligman. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners. J. Audiology, 33(1): 15–24, 1994.
26. J. G. van Velden and G. F. Smoorenburg. Vowel recognition in noise for male, female and child voices. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 796–799, 1995.
27. G. A. Miller, G. A. Heise, and W. Lichten. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. Experi. Psychol., 41: 329–335, 1951.
28. R. W. Schaefer and L. R. Rabiner. Digital representation of speech signals. Proc. IEEE, 63(4): 662–677, 1975.
29. W. G. Sears. Anatomy and Physiology for Nurses and Students of Human Biology. Arnold, 4th edition, 1967.
30. F. White. Our Acoustic Environment. JohnWiley, 1976.
31. B. C. J. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Academic Press, 1992.
32. R. Duncan-Luce. Sound and Hearing: A Conceptual Introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
33. W. F. Ganong. Review of Medical Physiology. Lange Medical Publications, 9th edition, 1979.
34. L. L. Beranek. The design of speech communications systems. Proc. IRE, pages 880–890, September 1947.
35. K. Kryter. The Effects of Noise on Man. Academic Press, 2nd edition, 1985.
36. W. Tempest, editor. The Noise Handbook. Academic Press, 1985.
37. P. J. Blamey, R. C. Dowell, and G. M. Clark. Acoustic parameters measured by a formant estimating speech processor for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 82(1): 38–47, 1987.
38. M. R. Schroeder, B. S. Atal, and J. L. Hall. Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 66(6): 1647 1979.
39. Y. M. Cheng and D. O’Shaughnessy. Speech enhancement based conceptually on auditory evidence. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 2 pages 961–963, 1991.
40. Y. M. Cheng and D. O’Shaughnessy. Speech enhancement based conceptually on auditory evidence. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., 39(9): 1943–1954, 1991.
41. Y. Gao, T. Huang, and J. P. Haton. Central auditory model for spectral processing. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 2 pages 704–707, 1993.
42. M. Mourjopoulos, J. Tsoukalas, and D. Paraskevas. Speech enhancement using psychoacoustic criteria. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 359–362, 1991.
43. N. Virag. Speech enhancement based on masking properties of the auditory system. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 1 pages 796–799, 1995.
44. J. C. R. Licklider. Auditory feature analysis. In Information Theory. Academic Press, 1956.
45. K. Kryter. The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise. Academic Press, 1994.
46. C. R. Darwin and R. B. Gardner. Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: Grouping and phase effects on vowel quality. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 79: 838–845, 1986.
47. D. Sen, D. H. Irving, and W. H. Holmes. Use of an auditory model to improve speech coders. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 2 pages 411–415, 1993.
48. H. Hermansky. Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. J. Acoustical Soc. America, 87(4): 1738–1752, 1990.
49. “ISO/MPEG – Audio Standard layers”. Editorial pages. Sound Studio Magazine, pages 40–41, July 1992.
50. J. I. Alcantera, G. J. Dooley, P. J. Blamey, and P. M. Seligman. Preliminary evaluation of a formant enhancement algorithm on the perception of speech in noise for normally hearing listeners. J. Audiology, 33(1): 15–24, 1994.
51. A. Azirani, R. Jeannes, and G. Faucon. Optimizing speech enhancement by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 1 pages 800–803, 1995.
52. R. E. P. Dowling and L. F. Turner. Modelling the detectability of changes in auditory signals. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 1 pages 133–136, 1993.
53. A. S. Bregman. Auditory Scene Analysis. MIT Press, 1990.
54. H. Purwins, B. Blankertz, and K. Obermayer. Computing auditory perception. Organised Sound, 5(3): 159–171, 2000.
55. J. Markel and A. Gray. Linear Prediction of Speech. Springer-Verlag, 1976.
56. J. Makhoul. Linear prediction: A tutorial review. Proc. IEEE, 63(4): 561–580, 1975.
57. S. Saito and K. Nakata. Fundamentals of Speech Signal Processing. Academic Press, 1985.
58. N. Sugamura and N. Favardin. Quantizer design in LSP speech analysis-synthesis. IEEE J. Selec. Areas Comms, 6(2): 432–440, 1988.
59. S. Saoudi, J. Boucher, and A. Guyader. A new efficient algorithm to compute the LSP parameters for speech coding. Signal Proc., 28(2): 201–212, 1995.
60. N. Sugamura and F. Itakura. Speech analysis and synthesis methods developed at ECL in NTT – from LPC to LSP. Speech Commun., 5: 213–229, 1986.
61. J. S. Collura and T. E. Tremain. Vector quantizer design for the coding of LSF parameters. In Proc. Int. Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 29–32, 1993.
62. I. V. McLoughlin. LSP parameter interpretation for speech classification. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information, Communications and Signal Processing, December 1999.
63. I. V. McLoughlin and F. Hui. Adaptive bit allocation for LSP parameter quantization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference Circuits and Systems, number 231, December 2000.
64. Q. Zhao and J. Suzuki. Efficient quantization of LSF by utilising dynamic interpolation. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pages 2629–2632, June 1997.
65. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. Trans-European trunked radio system (TETRA) standard. A European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) standard, 1994.
66. K. K. Paliwal and B. S. Atal. Efficient vector quantization of LPC parameters at 24 bits per frame. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 661–664, 1991.
67. D. Chang, S. Ann, and C.W. Lee. Aclassified vector quantization of LSF parameters. Signal Proc., 59(3): 267–273, June 1997.
68. R. Laroia, N. Phamdo, and N. Farvardin. Robust and efficient quantization of speech LSP parameters using structured vector quantizers. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 641–644, 1991.
69. H. Zarrinkoub and P. Mermelstein. Switched prediction and quantization of LSP frequencies. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 757–760, 1996.
70. C. S. Xydeas and K. K. M. So. A long history quantization approach to scalar and vector quantization of LSP coefficients. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 1–4, 1993.
71. J.-H. Chen, R. V. Cox, Y.-C. Lin, N. Jayant, and M. J. Melchner. A low-delay CELP coder for the CCITT 16 kb/s speech coding standard. IEEE J. Selec. Areas Comms, 10(5): 830–849, 1992.
72. B. S. Atal. Predictive coding of speech at low bitrates. IEEE Trans. Commun., COM30: 600–614, 1982.
73. M. R. Schroeder and B.S. Atal. Code-excited linear prediction CELP: High-quality speech at very low bit rates. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 937–940, 1985.
74. L. M. Supplee, R. P. Cohn, J. S. Collura, and A. V. McCree. MELP: The new Federal standard at 2400 bps. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc., volume 2, pages 1591–1594, April 1997.
75. I. A. Gerson and M. A. Jasiuk. Vector sum excited linear prediction (VSELP) speech coding at 8 kbps. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc., volume 1, pages 461–464, April 1990.
76. L. R. Rabiner and R.W. Schaefer. Digital Processing of Speech Signals. Prentice-Hall, 1978.
77. TI and MIT TIMIT database. A CD-ROM database of phonetically classified recordings of sentences spoken by a number of different male and female speakers, disc 1-1.1, 1990.
78. I. V. McLoughlin. LSP parameter interpretation for speech classification. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, number 113, September 1999.
79. K. K. Paliwal. A study of LSF representation for speaker-dependent and speaker-independent HMM-based speech recognition systems. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Volume 2, pages 801–804, 1990.
80. J. Parry, I. Burnett, and J. Chicharo. Linguistic mapping in LSF space for low-bit rate coding. Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Volume 2, pages 653–656, March 1999.
81. L. R. Rabiner, M. Cheng, A. Rosenberg, and C. McGonegal. Acomparative performance study of several pitch detection algorithms. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech Signal Proc., 24(5): 399–418, 1976.
82. L. Cohen. Time-Frequency Analysis. Prentice-Hall, 1995.
83. Z. Q. Ding, I. V. McLoughlin, and E. C. Tan. How to track pitch pulse in LP residual – joint time-frequency distribution approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing, August 2001.
84. A. G. Krishna and T. V. Sreenivas. Musical instrument recognition: From isolated notes to solo phrases. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc., Volume 4, pages 265–268, 2004.
85. The British Broadcasting Corporation BBC. BBC Radio 4: Brett Westwood’s guide to garden birdsong, May 2007. URL http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/birdsong.shtml.
86. A. Harma and P. Somervuo. Classification of the harmonic structure in bird vocalization. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Proc.,Volume 5, pages 701–704, 2004.