Computing auditory perception

Organised Sound

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 159-171

  Purwins, Hendrik ^a   Obermayer, Klaus ^b   Blankertz, Benjamin ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER FIRST   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949259619     PISSN: 13557718     EISSN: 14698153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355771800005069     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Cooke, M., and Brown, G. 1998. Matlab Auditory Demonstrations (MAD), Version 2.0: http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/ ~martin/MAD/docs/mad.htm (good demonstrations of oscillators, runs on UNIX).
2. O’Mard, L. P. 1997. Development System for Auditory Modelling (DSAM), Version 2.0: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ psychology/hearinglab/dsam/home.html (large, requires some effort to learn).
3. Slaney, M. 1998. Auditory Toolbox for Matlab, Version 2: http: //rvl4. ecn. purdue. edu/~malcolm/interv al/1998-010/ (portable, easy to handle, useful for frequency estimation).
4. Auditory mailing list archive including actual research topics: http://sound.media.mit.edu/dpwe-bin/mhindex.cgi/ AUDITOR Y/postings/2000
5. Information resource for auditory neurophysiology: http://neuro.bio.tu-darmstadt.de/langner/langner.html
6. Bellgard, M. I., and Tsang, C. P. 1994. Harmonizing music the Boltzmann way. Connection Science 6(2&3): 281–97.
7. Bregman, A. S., and Dannenbring, G. 1973. The effect of continuity on auditory stream segregation. Perception Psychophysics 13: 308–12.
8. Brown, G. J., and Cooke, M. 1998. Temporal synchronization in a neural oscillator model of primitive auditory stream segregation. In D. F. Rosenthal and H. G. Okuno (eds.) Computational Auditory Scene Analysis, pp. 87–103. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Brown, J. 1991. Calculation of a constant Q spectral transform. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(1): 425–34.
10. Brown, J., and Puckette, M. S. 1992. An efficient algorithm for the calculation of a constant Q transform. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92(5): 2,698-701.
11. Camurri, A., Coletta, P., Ricchetti, M., and Volpe, G. 2000. Synthesis of expressive movement. Proc. ICMC, pp. 270–3. International Computer Music Association.
12. Cardoso, J.-F. 1998. Blind signal separation: statistical principles. In Proc. of the IEEE, Special Issue on Blind Identification and Estimation.
13. Casey, M. A., and Westner, A. 2000. Separation of mixed audio sources by independent subspace analysis. Proc. ICMC, pp. 154–61. International Computer Music Association.
14. Chowning, J. M. 1980. Computer synthesis of the singing voice. Sound Generation in Winds, Strings, Computers, p. 29. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
15. Comon, P. 1994. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Processing 36(3): 287–314.
16. Cooke, M. P., and Brown, G. J. 1999. Interactive explorations in speech and hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 20(2): 81–97.
17. Cope, D. 1996. Experiments in Musical Intelligence. Madison, WI: A-R Editions.
18. von Ehrenfels, C. 1890. Uber Gestaltqualitaten. Vierteljah-resschrift Wiss. Philos. 14: 249–92.
19. Engel, A., Roelfsema, P. R., Fries, P., Brecht, M., and Singer, W. 1997. Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cerebral Cortex 7: 571–82.
20. Feulner, J. 1993. Neural networks that learn and reproduce various styles of harmonization. Proc. ICMC, pp. 236–8. International Computer Music Association.
21. Fielder, L. D., Bosi, M., Davidson, G., Davis, M., Todd, C., and Vernon, S. 1995. AC-2 and AC-3: low-complexity transform-based audio coding. In Collected Papers on Digital Audio Bit-Rate Reduction.
22. Gang, D., and Berger, J. 1997. A neural network model of metric perception and cognition in the audition of functional tonal music. In Proc. ICMC. International Computer Music Association.
23. Graepel, T., Burger, M., and Obermayer, K. 1997. Phase transitions in stochastic self-organizing maps. Physical Review E. 56(4): 3,876-90.
24. Grey, J. M. 1977. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of
25. Bregman, A. C. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Hawkins, H. L., McMullen, T. A., Popper, A. N., and Fay, R. R. (eds.) 1996. Auditory Computation, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 6. New York: Springer.
27. Haykin, S. 1999. Neural Networks, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (eds.) 1991. Principles of Neural Science, 3rd edn. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
29. Moore, B. C. J. 1989. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 3rd edn. London: Academic Press.
30. Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W. 1989. Discrete-time Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Rosenthal, D. F., and Okuno, H. G. (eds.) 1998. Computational
32. Auditory Scene Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Strang, G., and Nguyen, T. 1997. Wavelets and Filter Banks. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley-Cambridge Press. musical timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61: 1,270-7.
34. Hodgkin, A. L., and Huxley, A. F. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology 117: 500–44.
35. Izmirli, O., and Bilgen, S. 1996. A model for tonal context time course calculation from acoustical input. Journal of New Music Research 25(3): 276–88.
36. Kashino, K., Nakadai, K., Kinoshita, T., and Tanaka, H. 1998. Application of the Bayesian probability network to music scene analysis. In D. F. Rosenthal and H. G. Okuno (eds.) Computational Auditory Scene Analysis, pp. 115–37. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Knapp, B. R., and Lustad, H. 1990. A bioelectric controller for computer music applications. Computer Music Journal 14(1): 42–7.
38. Kohonen, T. 1982. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics 43: 59–69.
39. Krumhansl, C. L. 1997. Psychophysiology of musical emotions. Proc. ICMC, pp. 3–6. International Computer Music Association.
40. Krumhansl, C. L., and Kessler, E. J. 1982. Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review 89: 334–68.
41. Lakatos, S. 2000. A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres. Perception and Psychophysics (in press).
42. Lee, T.-W., Girolami, M., Bell, A. J., and Sejnowski, T. J. 1998. A unifying information-theoretic framework for independent component analysis. International Journal on Mathematical and Computer Modeling.
43. Leman, M. 1995. Music and Schema Theory, Springer Series in Information Sciences 31. Berlin: Springer.
44. Linsker, R. 1989. How to generate ordered maps by maximizing the mutual information between input and output signals. Neural Computation 1: 402–11.
45. Maass, W. 1997. Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models. Neural Networks 10: 1,659-71.
46. Mach, E. 1886. Beitrage zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Jena.
47. Marin, O. S. M., and Perry, D. W. 1999. Neurological aspects of music perception and performance. In D. Deutsch (ed.) The Psychology of Music, 2nd edn, pp. 653–724. Academic Press Series in Cognition and Perception. San Diego: Academic Press.
48. McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., Donnadieu, S., DeSoete, G., and Kimphoff, J. 1995. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities and latent subject classes. Psychological Research 58: 177–92.
49. Meddis, R., and Hewitt, M. J. 1991. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I: Pitch identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(6): 2,866-82.
50. Mozer, M. C. 1994. Neural network music composition by prediction: exploring the benefits of psychoacoustic constraints and multi-scale processing. Connection Science 6(2&3): 247–80.
51. Muller, K.-R., Philips, P., and Ziehe, A. 1999. JADE-TD: combining higher-order statistics and temporal information for blind source separation (with noise). Proc. of the First Todd, N. 1999. Implications of a sensory-motor theory for the representation and segregation of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105(2): 1,307.
52. Vapnik, V. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. New York: Jon Wiley and Sons.
53. Wang, D. L. 1996. Primitive auditory segregation based on oscillatory correlation. Cognitive Science 20: 409–56.
54. Weber, C. 2000. Maximum a Posteriori Models for Cortical