Comparative bone tissue integration of nanostructured and microroughened dental implants

Nanomedicine

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 741-751

  Salou, Laëtitia ^a,b,c   Hoornaert, Alain ^d   Stanovici, Julien ^a   Briand, Sylvain ^a,d   Louarn, Guy ^c   Layrolle, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b Biomedical Tissues   (France)

^c INSTITUT DES MATÉRIAUX JEAN ROUXEL   (France)

^d NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

bone to implant contact; dental implant; nanostructure; osseointegration; titanium

Indexed keywords

MERLIN; NANOMATERIAL; NANOTUBE; TITANIUM; METAL NANOPARTICLE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; BONE TISSUE INTEGRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FIELD EMISSION SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FRACTURE HEALING; GAMMA IRRADIATION; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; ROENTGEN SPECTROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; ANIMAL; FEMUR; NANOMEDICINE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RABBIT; SURGERY;

ANIMALS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; FEMUR; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOMEDICINE; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTUBES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RABBITS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84926030442     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.223     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Le Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. 23(7), 844-854 (2007).
2. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J. Dent. Res. 83(7), 529-533 (2004).
3. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 34(1), 78-86 (2007).
4. Lavenus S, Ricquier J-C, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Cell interaction with nanopatterned surface of implants. Nanomedicine 5(6), 937-947 (2010).
5. Suzuki K, Aoki K, Ohya K. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Bone 21(6), 507-514 (1997).
6. Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. How do implant surface characteristics influence peri-implant disease? J. Clin. Periodontol. 38, 214-222 (2011).
7. Subramani K, Wismeijer D. Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat periimplantitis: A literature review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 27(5), 1043-1054 (2012).
8. Cai K, Bossert J, Jandt KD. Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 49(2), 136-144 (2006).
9. Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M, Ruml T, Svorcik V. Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol. Adv. 29(6), 739-767 (2011).
10. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6(4), 483-495 (2004).
11. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 6(12), 997-1003 (2007).
12. Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 7(6), 1686-1691 (2007).
13. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YSJ et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106(7), 2130-2135 (2009)
14. Lavenus S, Trichet V, Le Chevalier S, Hoornaert A, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Cell differentiation and osseointegration influenced by nanoscale anodized titanium surfaces. Nanomedicine 7(7), 967-980 (2012).
15. Mor GK, Varghese OK, Paulose M, Shankar K, Grimes CA. A review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: fabrication, material properties, and solar energy applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(14), 2011-2075 (2006).
16. Dalby MJ. Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med. Eng. Phys. 27(9), 730-742 (2005).
17. Apolinário A, Sousa CT, Ventura J et al. The role of the Ti surface roughness in the self-ordering of TiO2 nanotubes: A detailed study of the growth mechanism. J. Mater. Chem. A 2(24), 9067-9078 (2014).
18. Sreekantan S, Saharudin KA, Lockman Z, Tzu TW. Fast-rate formation of TiO2 nanotube arrays in an organic bath and their applications in photocatalysis. Nanotechnology 21(36), 365603 (2010).
19. Mor GK, Varghese OK, Paulose M, Mukherjee N, Grimes CA. Fabrication of tapered, conical-shaped titania nanotubes. J. Mater. Res. 18(11), 2588-2593 (2003).
20. Lavenus S, Berreur M, Trichet V, Pilet P, Louarn G, Layrolle P. Adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium nanopores. Eur. Cell. Mater. 22, 84-96; discussion 96 (2011).
21. Von Wilmowsky C, Bauer S, Roedl S, Neukam FW, Schmuki P, Schlegel KA. The diameter of anodic TiO2 nanotubes affects bone formation and correlates with the bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in vivo. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 23(3), 359-366 (2012).
22. Wang N, Li H, Lü W et al. Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials 32(29), 6900-6911 (2011).
23. Ercan B, Taylor E, Alpaslan E, Webster TJ. Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy. Nanotechnology 22(29), 295102 (2011).