Payments for environmental services in Indonesia: What if economic signals were lost in translation?

Land Use Policy

Volumn 46, Issue , 2015, Pages 283-291

  Lapeyre, Renaud ^a   Pirard, Romain ^b   Leimona, Beria ^c  

^a SCIENCES PO   (France)

^b CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

^c ICRAF World Agroforestry Centre Bogor   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Economic incentives; Indonesia; Market based instruments; Motivations; Payments for environmental services; Watershed services

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL WORKER; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INCENTIVE; LAND USE PLANNING; SERVICE PROVISION; WATERSHED;

BANTEN; CIDANAU BASIN; GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; JAVA; SUNDA ISLES;

EID: 84925982839     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Balderas Torres A., MacMillan D.C., Skutsch M., Lovett J.C. Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 72-81.
2. Bremer L.L., Farley K.A., Lopez-Carr D. What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program. Land Use Policy 2014, 36:122-133.
3. Budhi G.S., Kuswanto S.A., Muhammad I. Concept and implementation of PES program in the Cidanau watershed: a lesson learned for future environmental policy. Policy Anal. Farming 2008, 6(1):37-55.
4. Chen X., Lupi F., He G., Liu J. Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106(28):11812-11817.
5. Chen H.T. Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness 2005, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
6. Cohen S. Understanding Environmental Policy 2006, 240. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
7. Collier A., Cotterill A., Everett T., Muckle R., Pike T., Vanstone A. Understanding and Influencing Behaviours: A Review of Social Research, Economics and Policy Making in Defra 2010, Draft paper for discussion, Departement for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, London.
8. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:663-674.
9. FAO Forests and water. FAO Forestry Paper 155 2008, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
10. Ferraro P.J., Simpson R.D. The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ. 2002, 78(3):339-353.
11. Ferraro P. Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:810-821.
12. Fisher J. No pay, no care? A case study exploring motivations for participation in payments for ecosystem services in Uganda. Oryx 2012, 46(1):45-54.
13. Gneezy U., Meier S., Rey-Biel P. When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. J. Econ. Perspect. 2011, 25(4):191-210.
14. Hahn R.W. Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor's orders. J. Econ. Perspect. 1989, 3(2):95-114.
15. Hanley N., Banerjee S., Lennox G.D., Armsworth P.R. How should we incentivise private landowners to 'produce' more biodiversity?. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2012, 28(1):93-113.
16. Hayes T.M. Payment for ecosystem services, sustained behavioural change, and adaptive management: peasant perspectives in the Colombian Andes. Environ. Conserv. 2012, 39:144-153.
17. Kosoy N., Martinez-Tuna M., Muradian R., Martinez-Alier J. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61:446-455.
18. Kosoy N., Corbera E., Brown K. Participation in payments for ecosystem services: case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico. Geoforum 2008, 39:2073-2083.
19. Lapeyre R., Pirard R. Payments for nvironmental services and market-based instruments: next of kin or false friends?. IDDRI Working Paper 14/13 2013, 16. Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations Internationales, Paris.
20. Leimona B., Pasha R., Rahadian N.P. The livelihood impacts of incentive payments for watershed management in Cidanau watershed, West Java, Indonesia. Payments for Environmental Services, Forest Conservation and Climate Change. Livelihoods in the REDD? 2010, 106-129. Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA. L. Tacconi, S. Mahanty, H. Suich (Eds.).
21. Mermet L., Laurans Y., Leménager T. Tools for what trade? Analysing the Utilisation of Economic Instruments and Valuations in Biodiversity Management. A savoir no 25, July 2014, 344. Agence Française de Développement, Paris.
22. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1202-1208.
23. Narloch U., Pascual U., Drucker A.G. Collective action dynamics under external rewards: experimental insights from Andean farming communities. World Dev. 2012, 40(10):2096-2107.
24. Pirard R., Billé R. Payments for Environmental Services (PES): a reality check (stories from Indonesia). IDDRI Analyses 03/10 2010, 22. Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations, Paris.
25. Pirard R., Lapeyre R. Classifying market-based instruments for ecosystem services: a rough guide to the literature jungle. Ecosyst. Serv. 2014, 9:106-114.
26. Pirard R. Market-based instruments for biodiversity and ecosystem services: a lexicon. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19-20:59-68.
27. Prendergrast J., Foley B., Menne V., Karalis Isaac A. Ceatures of Habit? The Art of Behavioural Change 2008, The Social Market Foundation, London.
28. Rico Garcia-Amado L., Ruiz Pérez M., Barrasa García S. Motivation for conservation: assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 89:92-100.
29. Instrument mixes for biodiversity policies. POLICYMIX Report. Issue No. 2/2011 2011, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig. I. Ring, C. Schröter-Schlaack (Eds.).
30. Shogren J. Behavioural economics and environmental incentives. OECD Environment Working Papers 49 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris.
31. Silva J.A., Mosimane A. How could I live here and not be a member?.": economic versus social drivers of participation in Namibian Conservation Programs. Hum. Ecol. 2014, 42:183-197.
32. Stavins R.N. Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments. Discussion Paper 01-58 2001, Resources for the Future.
33. Van Hecken G., Bastiaensen J. Payments for ecosystem services in Nicaragua: do market-based approaches work?. Dev. Change 2010, 41(3):421-444.
34. Vatn A., Barton N.D., Lindhjem H., Movik S., Ring I., Santos R. Can markets protect biodiversity? An evaluation of different financial mechanisms. Noragric Report No. 60 2011, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB).
35. White H. Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice. 3ie Working Paper 3 2009, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, London.
36. Wunder S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42 2005, Center for International Forestry Research, Indonesia.
37. Yoshikawa N., Shiozawa S., Ardiansya Nitrogen budget and gaseous nitrogen loss in a tropical agricultural watershed. Biogeochemistry 2008, 87:1-15.
38. Yoshino K., Ishioka Y. Guidelines for soil conservation towards integrated basin management for sustainable development: a new approach based on the assessment of soil loss risk using remote sensing and GIS. Paddy Water Environ. 2005, 3:235-247.
39. Yoshino K., Ishikawa M., Setiwawn B.I. Socio-economic causes of recent environmental changes in Cidanau watershed, west Java, Indonesia: effects of Economic Crises in Southeast Asia in 1997-1998 on regional environment. Rural Environ. Eng. 2003, 44:27-41.
40. Zbinden S., Lee D.R. Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA Program. World Dev. 2005, 33(2):255-272.