Impact of continuous quality improvement initiatives on clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 34, Issue , 2014, Pages S43-S48

  Yu, Yusheng ^a   Zhou, Yan ^a   Wang, Han ^a   Zhou, Tingting ^a   Li, Qing ^a   Li, Taoyu ^a   Wu, Yan ^a   Liu, Zhihong ^a  

^a MEDICAL SCHOOL OF NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Continuous quality improvement; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CAUSE OF DEATH; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC GLOMERULONEPHRITIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HEART DISEASE; HEART FUNCTION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYPOTENSION; INTERVENTRICULAR SEPTAL THICKNESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHINA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INCIDENCE; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; REFERENCE VALUE; REGISTER; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHINA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; PERITONITIS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REFERENCE VALUES; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925883335     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: 17184304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2013.00123     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Li PK, Law MC, Chow KM, Leung CB, Kwan BC, Chung KY, et al. Good patient and technique survival in elderly patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27(Suppl 2): S196-201.
2. Ersoy FF. Improving technique survival in peritoneal dialysis: what is modifiable? Perit Dial Int 2009; 29(Suppl 2): S74-7.
3. Afolalu B, Troidle L, Osayimwen O, Bhargava J, Kitsen J, Finkelstein FO. Technique failure and center size in a large cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients in a defined geographic area. Perit Dial Int 2009; 29: 292-6.
4. Sipahi I, Swaminathan A, Natesan V, Debanne SM, Simon DI, Fang JC. Effect of antihypertensive therapy on incident stroke in cohorts with prehypertensive blood pressure levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke 2012; 43: 432-40.
5. Jiang Z, Yu X. Advancing the use and quality of peritoneal dialysis by developing a peritoneal dialysis satellite center program. Perit Dial Int 2011; 31: 121-6.
6. Mujais S, Story K. Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2006; (103): S21-6.
7. Sipahioglu MH, Aybal A, Unal A, Tokgoz B, Oymak O, Utas C. Patient and technique survival and factors affecting mortality on peritoneal dialysis in Turkey: 12 years' experience in a single center. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28: 238-45.
8. Han SH, Lee JE, Kim DK, Moon SJ, Kim HW, Chang JH, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients: single center experience from Korea. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28(Suppl 3): S21-6.
9. Yang X, Mao HP, Guo QY, Yu XQ. Successfully managing a rapidly growing peritoneal dialysis program in Southern China. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011; 124: 2696-700.
10. Li PK, Szeto CC. Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 1475-8.
11. Han SH, Lee SC, Ahn SV, Lee JE, Choi HY, Kim BS, et al. Improving outcome of CAPD: twenty-five years' experience in a single Korean center. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27: 432-40.
12. Nakamoto H, Kawaguchi Y, Suzuki H. Is technique survival on peritoneal dialysis better in Japan? Perit Dial Int 2006; 26: 136-43.
13. United States, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, US Renal Data System (USRDS). 2009 Annual Data Report. 2 vols. Bethesda, MD: USRDS; 2009.
14. Fang W, Qian J, Lin A, Rowaie F, Ni Z, Yao Q, et al. Comparison of peritoneal dialysis practice patterns and outcomes between a Canadian and a Chinese centre. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 4021-8.
15. Chung SH, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B, Lee HB. Peritoneal dialysis patient survival: a comparison between a Swedish and a Korean centre. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20: 1207-13.
16. Brown EA, Davies SJ, Rutherford P, Meeus F, Borras M, Riegel W, et al. Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2948-57.