Is technique survival on peritoneal dialysis better in Japan?

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 136-143

  Nakamoto, Hidetomo ^a   Kawaguchi, Yoshindo ^b   Suzuki, Hiromichi ^a  

^a SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Kanagawa Prefectural Atsugi Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Japan; Peritonitis; Technique survival; Ultrafiltration loss

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EXPERIENCE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MORTALITY; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DISEASE; PERITONITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SANITATION; STAFF TRAINING; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; ULTRAFILTRATION; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; STATISTICS;

HUMANS; JAPAN; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 33747091004     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080602600203     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Blake PG, Bloembergen WE, Fenton SA. Changesin demographics and prescription of PD during the last decade. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32(Suppl 4):S44-51.
2. Coles GA, Williams JD. What is the place of peritoneal dialysis in the integrated treatment of renal failure? Kidney Int 1998; 54:2234-40.
3. Wolcott DL, Nissensson AR. Quality of life in chronic dialysis patients: a critical comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1988; 11:402-12.
4. Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. An overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan as of 31 December 2003. Ther Apher Dial 2005; 9:431-58.
5. Moeller S, Gioberge S, Brown G. ESRD patients in 2001: global overview of patients, treatment modalities and development trends. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:2071-6.
6. Young EW, Goodkin DA, Mapes DL, Port FK, Keen ML, Chen K, et al. The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): an international hemodialysis study. Kidney Int Suppl 2000; 74:S74-81.
7. Goodkin DA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Koenig KG, Wolfe RA, Akiba T, Angreucci VE, et al. Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:3270-7.
8. Aloatti S, Manes M, Paternoster G, Gaiter AM, Molino A, Rosati C. Peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease. J Nephrol 2000; 13:331-42.
9. Davies SJ, Phillips L, Griffiths AM, Russell LH, Naish PF. What really happens to people on long-term peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1998; 54:2207-17.
10. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. Population projection for Japan: 2001-2050. January 2002. Available at: http://www.ipss.go.jp/pp-newest/e/ppfj02/ppfj02.pdf
11. Blake PG. Trends in patient and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis and strategies: how are we doing and how we can do better? Adv Renal Replace Ther 2000; 7:324-37.
12. Nolph KD. Technique survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14:322-3.
13. Maiorca R, Vonesh E, Cavetli P, Be Vecchi A, Giangrande A, La Greca G, et al. A multicenter selective-adjusted comparison of patient and technique survivals on CAPD and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1991; 11:118-27.
14. Pork FK, Held PJ, Nolph KD, Turenne MN, Wolf RA. Risk of peritonitis in technique failure: a national study. Kidney Int 1992; 42:967-74.
15. Kawaguchi Y, Hasegawa T, Nakayama M, Kubo H, Shigematsu T. Issues affecting the longevity of the continuous peritoneal dialysis therapy. Kidney Int Suppl 1997; 62:S105-7.
16. Maiorca R, Cantaluppi A, Cancarini GC, Scalamogna A, Broccoli R, Graziani G, et al. Prospective controlled trial of Y-connector and disinfectant to prevent peritonitis in CAPD. Lancet 1983; ii(8351):642-4.
17. Nakamoto H, Imai H, Kawanishi H, Nakamoto M, Minakuchi M, Kumon S, et al. Effect of diabetes on peritoneal function assessed by personal dialysis capacity test in patients undergoing CAPD. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40:1045-54.
18. Nakamoto H, Suzuki H, Japan PDC Study Group. Hypoproteinemia in DM patients is attributable to high permeability of peritoneal membrane undergoing CAPD. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23(Suppl 2):572-8.
19. Kawaguchi Y, Ishizaki T, Imada A, Oohira S, Kuriyama S, Nakamoto H, et al., Study Group for Withdrawal from PD in Japan. Searching for the reasons for drop-out from peritoneal dialysis: a nationwide survey in Japan. Perit Dial Int 2003; 23(Suppl 2):S175-7.
20. Honda M. The 1997 reports of the Japanese National Registry data on pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19(Suppl 2):S473-8.
21. Kawaguchi Y. National comparisons: optimal peritoneal dialysis outcomes among Japanese patients. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19(Suppl 3):S9-16.
22. Szeto CC, Wong TY, Chow K, Leung C, Law M, Li PK. Independent effects of renal and peritoneal clearances on the mortality of peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 2004; 24:58-63.
23. Szeto CC, Wong TY, Leung C, Wang AY, Law M, Lui S, et al. Importance of dialysis in mortality and morbidity of Chinese CAPD patients. Kidney Int 2000; 58:400-7.
24. Choi SR, Lee SC, Kim BS, Yoon SY, Park HC, Kang SW, et al. Comparative study of renal replacement therapy in Korea diabetic end-stage renal disease patients: a single center study. Yonsei Med J 2003; 44:454-62.
25. Iqbal MM, Islam MN, Sattar H, Samad MA, Hossain RM, Islam S, et al. Outcome of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a group of elderly patients from Bangladesh. Adv Perit Dial 2004; 20:101-4.
26. Utas C, for the Turkish Multicenter Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group (TULIP). Patient and technique survival on CAPD in Turkey. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:602-6.
27. Ozener C, Bihorac A, Akoglu E. Technical survival of CAPD catheters: comparison between percutaneous and conventional surgical placement techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1893-9.
28. Huisman RM, Nieuwenhuizen MG, Th de Charro F. Patient-related and center-related factors influencing technique survival of peritoneal dialysis in The Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:1655-60.
29. Jager KJ, Merkus MP, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EL, Tijssen JGP, Stevens P, et al., for the NECOSAD Study Group. Mortality and technique failure in patients starting chronic peritoneal dialysis: results of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. Kidney Int 1999; 55:1476-85.
30. Bistrup C, Holm-Nielsen A, Pederson RS. Technique survival and complication rates in a newly started CAPD center (five years of experience). Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:90-8.
31. Lambert MC, Vijt D, De Smet R, Lameire N. Patients and technique survival after treatment shifts between CAPD and haemodialysis in a single center. EDTNA ERCA J 1996; 22(3):4-7, 14.
32. Lupo A, Tarchini R, Cancarini GC, Catizone L, Cocchi R, De Vecchi A, et al. Long-term outcome in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a 10-year survey by the Italian Cooperative Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24:826-37.
33. Maiorca R, Cancarini GC, Zubani R, Camerini C, Manili L, Brunori G, et al. CAPD viability: a long-term comparison with hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16:276-87.
34. Gloor HF, Pandolfi S, Ruttimann S. 20 years of peritoneal dialysis in a mid-sized Swiss hospital. Swiss Med Wkly 2003; 133:619-24.
35. Brown EA, Davies SJ, Rutherford P, Meeus F, Borras M, Riegel W, et al., EAPOS Group. Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study. Am J Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2948-57.
36. Guo A, Mujais S. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int Suppl 2003; 88:S3-12.
37. Rotellar C, Black J, Winchester JF, Rakowaski TA, Mosher WF, Mazzoni MJ, et al. Ten years' experience with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1991; 17:158-64.
38. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SSA. Trend in CAPD technique failure: Canada, 1981-1997. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21: 365-71.
39. Jindai KK, Hirsch DJ. Excellenttechnique survival on home peritoneal dialysis: results of a regional program. Perit Dial Int 1994; 14:324-6.
40. Passadakis P, Thodis E, Vargemezis V, Oreopoulos D. Long-term survival with peritoneal dialysis in ESRD due to diabetes. Clin Nephrol 2001; 56:257-70.
41. Marcelli D, Spotti D, Conte F, Tagliaferro A, Limido A, Lonati F, et al. Survival of diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16(Suppl 1): S283-7.
42. Domrongkitchaiporn S, Karim M, Watson L, Moriarty M. The influence of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis connection technique on peritonitis rate and technique survival. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24:50-8.
43. Cueto-Manzano AM, Quintano-Pina E, Cornea-Rotter R. Long term CAPD survival and analysis of mortality risk factors: 12-year experience of a single Mexican center. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:148-53.
44. Ohno M, Oda H, Ohashi H, Watanabe S, Wakata S, Fuji E, et al. Risk factors of CAPD [in Japanese]. Hukumaku Toseki 99 (Jin to Toseki) 1999; 47(Suppl):184-7.
45. Tomo M, Fukushima H, Yanase T, Edakuni S, Aiya T. Present status of CAPD patients in Kyusyu region - compared with the status of 2000 - from Kyusyu CAPD registry of Kyusyu CAPD Investigation Committee [in Japanese]. Hukumaku Toseki 2002 (Jin to Toseki) 2002; 53(Suppl):141-3.
46. Nakamoto H, Hashikita Y, Itabashi A, Kobayashi T, Suzuki H. Changes in the organisms of resistant peritonitis in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Adv Perit Dial 2004; 20:52-7.
47. Schaubel DE, Blake PG, Fenton SS. Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2001; 60:1517-24.
48. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2000 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2000.
49. Iseki K, Tozawa M, Takishita S. Effects of the duration of dialysis on survival in a cohort of chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18:782-7.
50. Churchill DN, Thorpe KE, Nolph KD, Keshaviah PR, Oreopoulos DG, Page D, for the CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Increased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9:1285-92.
51. Stegmayr B, Granbom L, Karlsson UM, Lindqvist B. Ultrafiltration failure and dialysate glucose in CAPD. Adv Perit Dial 1993; 9:62-4.
52. Heimburger O, Waniewski J, Werynski A, Tranaeus A, Lindholm B. Peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD patients with permanent loss of ultrafiltration capacity. Kidney Int 1990; 38:495-506.
53. Nakamoto H, Babasono T, Kasai K, Kuriyama S, Sugimoto T, Nakayama M, et al. Successful use of icodextrin in elderly patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Adv Perit Dial 2005; 21:169-74.