Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces

NeuroImage

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 2128-2135

  Kovács, Gyula ^a,b   Iffland, Lara ^a   Vidnyánszky, Zoltán ^c,d   Greenlee, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^c PÁZMÁNY PÉTER CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FACE REPETITION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETINA; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858732215     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.038     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alink A., Schwiedrzik C.M., Kohler A., Singer W., Muckli L. Stimulus predictability reduces responses in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:2960-2966.
2. Andrews T.J., Clarke A., Pell P., Hartley T. Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream. Neuroimage 2010, 49:703-711.
3. Andrews T.J., Ewbank M.P. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage 2004, 23:905-913.
4. Axelrod V., Yovel G. Nonpreferred stimuli modify the representation of faces in the fusiform face area. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:746-756.
5. Boehler C.N., Schoenfeld M.A., Heinze H.J., Hopf J.M. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:2231-2239.
6. Brett M., Johnsrude I.S., Owen A.M. The problem of functional localization in the human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:243-249.
7. Carrasco M. Visual attention: the past 25 years. Vision Res. 2011, 51:1484-1525.
8. Cziraki C., Greenlee M.W., Kovács G. Neural correlates of high-level adaptation-related aftereffects. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:1410-1417.
9. den Ouden H.E.M., Friston K.J., Daw N.D., Mcintosh A.R., Stephan K.E. A dual role for prediction error in associative learning. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:1175-1185.
10. Denys K., Vanduffel W., Fize D., Nelissen K., Peuskens H., van Essen D., Orban G.A. The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:2551-2565.
11. Egner T., Monti J.M., Summerfield C. Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:16601-16608.
12. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
13. Friston K., Kiebel S. Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1211-1221.
14. Friston K.J. A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360:815-836.
15. Furl N., van Rijsbergen N.J., Treves A., Friston K.J., Dolan R.J. Experience-dependent coding of facial expression in superior temporal sulcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:13485-13489.
16. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:495-5040.
17. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
18. Grill-Spector K., Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N.G. The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res. 2001, 41:1409-1422.
19. Grill-Spector K., Henson R.N.A., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:14-23.
20. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:223-233.
21. Ishai A. Let's face it: it's a cortical network. Neuroimage 2008, 40:415-419.
22. Kaliukhovich D.A., Vogels R. Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 21:1547-1558.
23. Kanwisher N.G., Yovel G. The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 361:2109-2128.
24. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N.G. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20:3310-3318.
25. Kovács G., Zimmer M., Bankó E., Harza I., Antal A., Vidnyánszky Z. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:742-753.
26. Kovács G., Cziraki C., Vidnyánszky Z., Schweinberger S.R., Greenlee M.W. Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas. Neuroimage 2008, 43:156-164.
27. Krekelberg B., Boynton G., van Wezel R. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals. Trends Neurosci. 2006, 29:250-256.
28. Larsson J., Smith A.T. fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation?. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 22:567-576.
29. Liu T., Larsson J., Carrasco M. Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron 2007, 55:313-323.
30. Liu T., Mance I. Constant spread of feature-based attention across the visual field. Vision Res. 2011, 51:26-33.
31. Malach R., Reppas J.B., Benson R.R., Kwong K.K., Jiang H., Kennedy W.A., Ledden P.J., Brady T.J., Rosen B.R., Tootell R.B.H. Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92:8135-8139.
32. Minear M., Park D.C. A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput. 2004, 36:630-633.
33. Melcher D., Papathomas T.V., Vidnyánszky Z. Implicit attentional selection of bound visual features. Neuron 2005, 46:723-729.
34. Murray S.O., Wojciulik E. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7:70-74.
35. Ollinger J.M., Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI. Neuroimage 2001, 13:218-229.
36. Rajimehr R., Devaney K.J., Bilenko N.Y., Young J.C., Tootell R.B.H. The "Parahippocampal Place Area" Responds Preferentially to High Spatial Frequencies in Humans and Monkeys. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9. (April 05).
37. Rao R.P., Ballard D.H. Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2:79-87.
38. Rossion B., Caldara R., Seghier M.L., Schuller A.M., Lazeyras F., Mayer E. A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain 2003, 126:2381-2395.
39. Rousselet G.A., Thorpe S.J., Fabre-Thorpe M. How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:363-370.
40. Saenz M., Buracas G., Boynton G. Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:631-632.
41. Sawamura H., Orban G.A., Vogels R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 2006, 49:307-318.
42. Schiltz C., Rossion B. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1385-1394.
43. Sohn W., Chong S.C., Papathomas T.V., Vidnyánszky Z. Cross-feature spread of global attentional modulation in human area MT+. Neuroreport 2005, 16:1389-1393.
44. Spratling M.W. Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention. Vision Res. 2008, 48:1391-1408.
45. Spratling M.W. Predictive coding as a model of response properties in cortical area V1. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:3531-3543.
46. Strange B.A., Duggins A., Penny W., Dolan R.J., Friston K.J. Information theory, novelty and hippocampal responses: unpredicted or unpredictable?. Neural Netw. 2005, 18:225-230.
47. Summerfield C., Trittschuh E.H., Monti J.M., Mesulam M.M., Egner T. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1004-1006.
48. Summerfield C., Egner T. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:403-409.
49. van Essen D.C., Anderson C.H., Felleman D.J. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science 1992, 255:419-423.
50. Wiggett A.J., Downing P.E. The face network: overextended? (Comment on: "Let's face it: It's a cortical network" by Alumit Ishai). Neuroimage 2008, 40:420-422.
51. Zhang W.T., Luck S. Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 12:24-25.