The creation of a global voice for citizens: The case of Denmark

Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 45-69

  Agger, Annika ^a   Jelsøe, Erling ^a   Jæger, Birgit ^a   Phillips, Louise ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925720411     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Agger, A. and Löfgren, K. (2008) 'Democratic assessment of collaborative planning processes', Planning Theory, vol 7, no 2, pp145-164
2. Andersen, I.-E. and Jæger, B. (1997) 'Involving citizens in assessment and the public debate on information technology', in A. Feenberg, T. H. Nielsen and L. Winner (eds) Technology and Democracy: Technology in the Public Sphere: Proceedings from Workshop 1, University of Oslo, Oslo
3. Andersen, I.-E. and Jæger, B. (1999) 'Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision-making', Science and Public Policy, vol 26, no 5, pp331-340
4. Beetham, D. (1993) Auditing Democracy in Britain: Democratic Audit, University of Essex, Scarman Trust
5. Benhabib, S. (1994) 'Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy', Constellations, vol 1, no 1, pp25-53
6. Blok, A. (2007) 'Experts on public trial: On democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference', Public Understanding of Science, vol 16, no 2, pp163-182
7. Button, M. and Ryfe, S. M. (2005) 'What can we learn from the practice of deliberative democracy?', in J. J. Gastil and P. Levine (eds) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
8. Cronberg, T. (1995) 'Do marginal voices shape technology?', in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Public participation in science: the role of consensus conferences in Europe London, Science Museum with the support of the European Commission Directorate General XII, pp125-134
9. Crowley, J. (2001) 'The political participation of ethnic minorities', International Political Science Review, vol 22, no 1, pp99-121
10. Danielsen, O. (2006) Atomkraften under pres: dansk debat om atomkraft 1974-85, Roskilde University Press, Roskilde
11. Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond - Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Einsiedel, F., Jelsøe, E. and Breck, T. (2001) 'Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia', Public Understanding of Science, vol 10, no 1, pp83-98
13. Elam, M. and Bertilsson, M. (2003) 'Consuming, engaging and confronting science: The emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship', European Journal of Social Theory, vol 6, no 2, pp233-251
14. Gastil, J. and Levine, P. (eds) (2005) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
15. Goven, J. (2003) 'Developing the consensus conference in New Zealand: Democracy and de-problematization', Public Understanding of Science, vol 12, no 4, pp423-444
16. Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (1996) Democracy and Disagreement, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Hansen, K. M. (2004) Deliberative Democracy and Opinion Formation, University Press of Southern Denmark, www.kaspermhansen.eu/Work/Hansen2004.pdf
18. Hedegaard, C. (2009) Opening Speech at the Danish World Wide Views event on the 26th of September 2009, Copenhagen, www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sMX5iajGYc&feature=related, accessed 11 February 2010
19. Hornig-Priest, S. (2005) 'Commentary: Room at the bottom of Pandora's box: Peril and promise in communicating nanotechnology', Science Communication, vol 27, no 2, pp292-299
20. Horst, M. (2008) 'In search of dialogue: Staging science communication in consensus conferences', in D. Cheng, M. Claessens and N. R. J. Gascoigne et al (eds) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, Springer Publishing, New York
21. Horst, M. and Irwin, A. (2010) 'Nations at ease with radical knowledge: On consensus, consensusing and false consensusness', Social Studies of Science, vol 40, no 1, pp105-126
22. Irwin, A. (2001) 'Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences', Public Understanding of Science, vol 10, no 1, pp1-18
23. Irwin, A. (2006) 'The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance', Social Studies of Science, vol 36, no 2, pp299-320
24. Jensen, C. B. (2005) 'Citizen projects and consensus-building at the Danish Board of Technology: On experiments in democracy', Acta Sociologica, vol 48, no 3, pp221-235
25. Joss, S. (1995) 'Evaluating consensus conferences', in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, Science Museum with the support of the European Commission Directorate General XII, London
26. Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) (1995) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, Science Museum with the support of the European Commission Directorate General XII, London
27. Klüver, L. (1995) 'Consensus conferences at the Danish Board of Technology', in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, Science Museum with the support of the European Commission Directorate General XII, London
28. MacNaghten, P., Kearnes, M. and Wynne, B. (2005) 'Nanotechnology, governance and public deliberation: What role for the social sciences?', Science Communication, vol 27, no 2, pp268-291
29. Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox, Verso, London
30. Pitkin, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
31. Rienecker, L. and Erichsen, F. (1990) Lægfolk i en konsensuskonference [Lay-people in a Consensus Conference], The Danish Board of Technology, Copenhagen
32. Rogers-Hayden, T. and Pidgeon, N. (2007) 'Moving engagement "upstream"? Nanotechnologies and Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry', Public Understanding of Science, vol 16, no 3, pp345-364
33. Saward, M. (2006) 'The representative claim', Contemporary Political Theory, vol 5, no 3, pp297-318
34. Smith, G. (2009) Democratic Innovations Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Teknologirådet (1996) Ti år med Teknologinævnet. En tiårsberetning om Teknologinævnet 1986-1995, Teknologirådet, Copenhagen
36. Teknologistyrelsen (1980) Teknologivurdering i Danmark - betænkning afgivet af et udvalg under Teknologirådet, Teknologistyrelsen, Copenhagen
37. Trench, B. (2008) 'Towards an analytical framework of science communication models', in D. Cheng, M. Claessens and T. Gascoigne et al (eds) (2008) Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, Springer Publishing, Dordrecht
38. Wynne, B. (2006) 'Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes but missing the music?', Community Genetics, vol 9, no 3, pp211-220
39. WWViews (World Wide Views of Global Warming) (2009) www.wwviews.org