Expert involvement in science development: (re-)evaluation of an early screening tool for carbon storage site characterization

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 37, Issue , 2015, Pages 228-236

  Scheer, D ^a   Konrad, W ^a   Class, H ^b   Kissinger, A ^b   Knopf, S ^c   Noack, V ^c  

^a DIALOGIK Non Profit Institute for Communication and Cooperation Research   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^c FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR GEOSCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES BGR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carbon storage site characterization; Expert involvement; Gravitational number; Science policy interface

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; SITE SELECTION;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); CARBON STORAGE; EXPERT INVOLVEMENT; GRAVITATIONAL NUMBER; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION; SCIENCE - POLICY INTERFACES; SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT; SCIENTIFIC METHOD;

CARBON CAPTURE;

ACCOUNTABILITY; ASSESSMENT METHOD; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DECISION MAKING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION; SAFETY; SITE CHARACTERIZATION;

EID: 84925718763     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Antunes P., Santos R., Videira N. Participatory decision making for sustainable development - the use of mediated modelling techniques. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:44-52.
2. Benarie M. Delphi and Delphi like approaches with special regard to environmental standard setting. Technol. Forecas. Soc. Change 1988, S149-S158.
3. Bogner A., Gaube V., Smetschka B. Partizipative Modellierung. Beteiligungsexperimente in der sozialökologischen Forschung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 2011, 36:74-97.
4. Bots P.W.G., van Daalen C.E. Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: a framework for reflection. Syst. Pract. Act. Res. 2008, 21:389-407.
5. Burgess J., Chilvers J.D. Upping the ante: a conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Sci. Public Policy 2006, 33(10):713-728.
6. Cockerill K., Passell H., Tidwell V. Cooperative modeling: building bridges between science and the public. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 2006, 42:457-471.
7. Corner A., Venables D., Spence A., Poortinga W., Demski C., Pidgeon N. Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 2011, 39:4823-4833.
8. Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2005, 8:125-139.
9. Dreyer M., Renn O. Participatory approaches to modelling for improved learning and decision-making in natural resource governance: an editorial. Environ. Policy Gov. 2011, 21:379-385.
10. Dreyer M., Konrad W., Scheer D. Partizipative modellierung. Methoden der Experten-und Stakeholdereinbindung in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung 2015, 265-289. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. M. Niederberger, S. Wassermann (Eds.).
11. Fischer A.R.H., Wentholt M.T.A., Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Expert involvement in policy development: a systematic review of current practice. Sci. Public Policy 2014, 41(3):332-343.
12. Fischer F. Hazardous waste policy, community movements and the politics of NIMBY: participatory risk assessment in the USA and Canada. Greening Environmental Policy 1995, 165-182. London, Paul Chapman. F. Fischer, M. Black (Eds.).
13. Fischer F. Citizens, Experts and the Environment 2000, Duke University Press, Durham NC.
14. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. Social Theories of Risk 1992, 251-273. Greenwood Press, New York. S. Krimsky, D. Golding (Eds.).
15. Gough C. State of the art in carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: an experts' review. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(1):155-168.
16. Grove-White R., Kearnes M., Macnaghten P., Wynne B. Nuclear futures: assessing public attitudes to new nuclear power. Polit. Quart. 2006, 77:238-246.
17. Hare M., Letcher R.A., Jakeman A.J. Participatory modelling in natural resource management: a comparison of four case studies. Integr. Assess. 2003, 4:62-72.
18. Hill K.Q., Fowles J. The methodological worth of the Delphi forecasting technique. Technol. Forecas. Soc. Change 1975, vol. 7(S):179-192.
19. Hon G. Towards a typology of experimental errors: an epistemological view. Studies Hist. Philos. Sci. 1989, 20:469-504.
20. Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizens participation in governing science. Minerva 2003, 41(3):223-244.
21. Jobert A., Laborgne P., Mimler S. Local acceptance of wind energy: factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2751-2760.
22. 2 storage using a dimensionless gravitational number applied to the North German Basin. Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess. 2014, 7:209-220.
23. 2 storage capacity in saline aquifers Part 1. Dimensional analysis of flow processes and reservoir characteristics. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:263-276.
24. 2 storage. Adv. Water Resour. 2010, 33:867-879.
25. Lengwiler M. Participatory approaches in science and technology: historical origins and current practices in critical perspective. Sci. Technol. Human Values 2008, 33(2):186-200.
26. Li D., Lake L. Scaling fluid flow through heterogeneous permeable media. SPE Adv. Technol. Ser. 1995, 3:188-197.
27. Malone E.L., Dooley J.J., Bradbury J. Moving from misinformation derived from public attitude surveys on carbon dioxide capture and storage towards realistic stakeholder involvement. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:419-425.
28. Miller E., Bell L., Buys L. Public understanding of carbon sequestration in Australia: socio-demographic predictors of knowledge, engagement and trust. Aus. J. Emerg. Technol. Soc. 2007, 5:15-33.
29. 2 injection: pressure control and capacity enhancement. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:4533-4543.
30. Nordbotten J.M., Celia M.A. Similarity solutions for fluid injection into confined aquifers. J. Fluid Mech. 2006, 2006:307-561.
31. 2: Modeling Approaches for Large-scale Simulation 2012, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
32. NRC Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making 2008, National Research Council, Washington DC.
33. Ornetzeder M., Rohracher H. User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy 2006, 34(2):138-150.
34. Petersen A.C. Simulating Nature: A Philosophical Study of Computer-Simulation Uncertainties and Their Role in Climate Science and Policy Advice 2006, Antwerpen, Het Spinhuis, Apeldoorn.
35. Petts J., Homan J., Pollard S. Participatory risk assessment: involving lay audiences in environmental decisions on risk. Environment Agency R&D Technical Report E2-043/TR/01 2003, Environment Agency, Bristol.
36. Ramírez A., Hoogwijk M., Hendriks C., Faaij A. Using a participatory approach to develop a sustainability framework for carbon capture and storage systems in The Netherlands. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(1):136-154.
37. Rapoport L. Scaling laws for use in design and operation of water-oil flow models. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Pet. Eng. Trans. 1955, 204:143-150.
38. Ravera F., Hubacek K., Reed M., Tarrasón D. Learning from experiences in adaptive action research: a critical comparison of two case studies applying participatory scenario development and modelling approaches. Environ. Policy Governance 2011, 21:433-453.
39. Refsgaard J.C., Henriksen H.J., Harrar W.G., Scholten H., Kassahun A. Quality assurance in model based water management-review of existing practice and outline of new approaches. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 20:1201-1215.
40. Reinhold K., Müller C., Riesenberg C. Informationssystem Speichergesteine für den Standort Deutschland K eine Grundlage zur klimafreundlichen geotechnischen und energetischen Nutzung des tieferen Untergrundes (Speicher-Kataster Deutschland). Technical Report 2011, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), Berlin/ Hannover.
41. Renn O., Webler T. Der kooperative Diskurs - Theoretische Grundlagen, Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten. Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs. Bürgerbeteiligung bei der Standortsuche für eine Deponie im Kanton Aargau 1998, 3-103. Hochschulverlag AG an der, ETH Zürich. H. Renn, P. Schild, U. Wilhelm (Eds.).
42. Richardson G.P., Andersen D.F. Teamwork in group model building. Sys. Dyn. Rev. 1995, 11:113-137.
43. Röckmann C., Ulrich C., Dreyer M., Bell E., Borodzicz E., Haapasaari P., Hauge K.H., Howell D., Mäntyniemi S., Miller D., Tserpes G., Pastoors M. The added value of participatory modeling in fisheries management - what has been learnt?. Mar. Policy 2012, 36:1072-1085.
44. Sala R., Oltra C. Experts' attitudes towards CCS technologies in Spain. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5(5):1339-1345.
45. 2-Speicherung 2013, Springer SV, Wiesbaden.
46. Scheer D. In silico science for climate policy: how policy-makers process and use carbon storage simulation data. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 47:148-156.
47. Scheer D., Konrad W., Scheel O. Public evaluation of electricity technologies and future low-carbon portfolios in Germany and the USA, Energy. Energy Sustain-ability Soc. 2013, 3:8.
48. Schulz M., Renn O. Gruppendelphi. Konzept und Fragebogenkonstruktion 2009, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
49. Simon C., Etienne M. A companion modelling approach applied to forest management planning. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25:1371-1384.
50. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society 1996, National Research Council, Washington DC. P.C. Stern, H.V. Fineberg (Eds.).
51. Stirling A. Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences. Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from Social Science 2003, 33-74. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. F. Berkhout, M. Leach, I. Scoones (Eds.).
52. 2 storage at the ketzin pilot site, Germany - a status report after ten years of public outreach. Energy Procedia 2014, 51:274-280.
53. 2 in saline aquifers: effects of gravity, viscous, and capillary forces on amount and timing of trapping. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:481-491.
54. van den Belt M. Mediated modeling. A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building 2004, Island Press, Washington.
55. 2 storage: outcomes of a Delphi approach. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:6353-6359.
56. Webler T., Levine D., Rakel H., Renn O. The Group Delphi: a novel attempt at reducing uncertainty. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1991, vol. 39(3):S253-S263.
57. Webler T., Tuler S., Dietz T. Modellers' and outreach professionals' views on the role of models in watershed management. Environ. Policy Gov. 2011, 21:472-486.
58. Weingart P., Lentsch J. Wissen, Beraten, Entscheiden. Form und Funktion wissenschaftlicher Politikberatung in Deutschland 2008, Velbrück Wissenschaft, Weilerswist.
59. Zhai P., Williams E.D. Analyzing consumer acceptance of photovoltaics (PV) using fuzzy logic model. Renew Energy 2012, 41:335-350.
60. Zhou D., Fayers F.J., Orr F., Jr Scaling of multiphase flow in simple heterogeneous porous media. SPE Reservoir Eng. 1997, 559-569.