Identifiable donors and siblings: Implications for the future

Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 250-269

  Freeman, Tabitha ^a   Appleby, John B ^a   Jadva, Vasanti ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925666666     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139026390.014     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Adair, V. and Purdie, A. (1996). ‘Donor insemination programmes with personal donors: issues of secrecy’. Human Reproduction, 11, 2558 –63.
2. Baetens, P., Devroey, P., Camus, M., Van Steirteghem, A. C., et al. (2000). ‘Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes’. Human Reproduction, 15, 476 –84.
3. Barton, M., Walker, K. and Weisner, B. P. (1945). ‘Artii cial insemination’. British Medical Journal, 1, 40 –2.
4. Brewaeys, A., Golombok, S., Naaktgeboren, N., de Bruyn, J. K., et al. (1997). ‘Donor insemination: Dutch parents’ opinions about coni dentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their children’. Human Reproduction, 12, 1591 –7.
5. Brewaeys, A., de Bruyn, J. K., Louwe, L. A. and Helmerhorst, F. M. (2005). ‘Anonymous or identity-registered sperm donors? A study of Dutch recipients’ choices’. Human Reproduction, 20, 820 –4.
6. Cook, R. and Golombok. S. (1995). ‘A survey of semen donation: phase II – the view of the donors’. Human Reproduction, 10, 951 –9.
7. Cook, R., Golombok, S., Bish, A. and Murray, C. (1995). ‘Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes’. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 65, 549 –59.
8. Crawshaw, M. (2002). ‘Lessons from a recent adoption study to identify some of the service needs of, and issues for, donor offspring wanting to know about their donors’. Human Fertilization, 5, 6 –12.
9. Daniels, K. and Lewis, G. M. (1996). ‘Openness of information in the use of donor gametes: developments in New Zealand’. Journal of Reproductive andInfant Psychology, 14, 57 –68.
10. Department of Health and Social Security (1984). ‘Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilization and Embryology’. London: HMSO (Comnd. 9314).
11. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
12. Fielding, D., Handley, S., Duqueno, L., Weaver, S., et al. (1998). ‘Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment’. Journal of Community and Applied SocialPsychology, 8, 273 –87.
13. Finkler, K. (2001). ‘The kin in the gene: the medicalization of family and kinship in American society’. Current Anthropology, 42, 235.
14. Freeman, T. and Richards, M. (2006). ‘DNA Testing and Kinship: Paternity, Genealogy and the Search for the “Truth” of our Genetic Origins’, in F. Ebtehaj, B. Lindley and M. Richards (eds.), Kinship Matters. Oxford: Hart.
15. Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2009). ‘Gamete donation: parents’ experiences of searching for their child’s donor siblings and donor’. Human Reproduction, 24, 505 –16.
16. Frith, L. (2001). ‘Beneath the rhetoric: the role of rights in the practice of nonanonymous gamete donation’. Bioethics, 15, 473 –84.
17. Godman, K. M., Sanders, K., Rosenberg, M. and Burton, P. (2006). ‘Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia’. Human Reproduction, 21 3022 –6.
18. Gollancz, D. (2001). ‘Donor insemination: a question of rights’. Human Fertility, 4, 164 –7.
19. Golombok, S., Brewaeys, A., Cook, R., Giavazzi. M. T., et al. (1996). ‘Children: the European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development’. Human Reproduction, 11, 2324 –31.
20. Golombok, S., MacCallum, F., Goodman, E. and Rutter, M. (2002). ‘Families with children conceived by donor insemination: a follow-up at age twelve’. Child Development, 73, 952 –68.
21. Golombok, S., Lycett, E., MacCallum, F., Jadva, V., et al. (2004). ‘Parenting infants conceived by gamete donation’. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 443 –52.
22. Gottlieb, C., Lalos, O. and Lindblad, F. (2000). ‘Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples’ attitudes’. Human Reproduction, 15, 2052 –6.
23. Greenfeld, D. A. and Klock, S. C. (2004). ‘Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients’. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1565 –71.
24. Greenfeld, D. A., Greenfeld, D. G., Mazure, C. M., Keefe, D. L., et al. (1998). ‘Do attitudes towards disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus direct donation?’ Fertility and Sterility, 70, 1009 –14.
25. Hunter, M., Salter-Ling, N. and Glover, L. (2000). ‘Donor insemination: telling children about their origins’. Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 5, 157 –63.
26. Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W. and Golombok, S. (2009). ‘The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type’. Human Reproduction, 24, 1909 –19.
27. Jadva, V. (2010a). ‘Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring’. HumanReproduction, 26, 638–645.
28. Jadva, V. (2010b). ‘Offsprings’ experiences of searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20 523–532.
29. Janssens, P. M. W., Simons, A. H. M., van Kooij, R. J., Blokzijl, E., et al. (2006). ‘A new Dutch law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact’. Human Reproduction, 21, 852 –6.
30. Kenney, N. J. and McGowan, M. L. (2010). ‘Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their i rst donation cycle’. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 455 –66.
31. Kirkman, M. (2004). ‘Genetic connection and relationships in narratives of donor-assisted conception’. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies andSociety, 2, 1 –20.
32. Laruelle, C., Place, I., Demeestrere, I., Englert, Y., et al. (2011). ‘Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origins inl uence in three types of oocyte donation’. Human Reproduction, 26, 382 –90.
33. Leeb-Lundberg, S., Kjellberg, S. and Sydsjo, G. (2006). ‘Helping parents to tell their children about the use of donor insemination (DI) and determining their opinions about open-identity sperm donation’. Acta Obstetricia etGynecologica Scandinavica, 85, 78 –81.
34. Lindblad, F., Gottlieb, C. and Lalos, O. (2000). ‘To tell or not to tell: what parents think about telling their children that they were born following donor insemination’. Journal Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 21, 193 –203.
35. Lycett, E., Daniels, K., Curson, R. and Golombok, S. (2004). ‘Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosure’. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 172 –9.
36. Lycett, E. (2005). ‘School-aged children of donor insemination: a study of parents’ disclosure patterns’. Human Reproduction, 20, 810 –19.
37. Nachtigall, R. D., Pitcher, L., Tschann, J. M., Becker, G., et al. (1998). ‘The disclosure decision: concerns and issues of parents and children conceived through donor insemination’. American Journal of Obstetrics andGynecology, 178, 1165 –70.
38. Purewal, S. and van den Akker, O. B. A. (2009). ‘Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences’. HumanReproduction, 5, 499 –515.
39. Rumball, A. and Adair, V. (1999). ‘Telling the story: parents’ scripts for donor offspring’. Human Reproduction, 14, 1392 –9.
40. Sauer, M. V., Gorrill, M. J., Zeffer, K. B. and Bustillo, M. (1989). ‘Attitudinal survey of sperm donors to an artii cial insemination clinic’. Journal ofReproductive Medicine, 34, 362 –4.
41. Sawyer, N. (2010). ‘Sperm donor limits that control for the “relative” risk associated with the use of open-identity donors’. Human Reproduction, 5, 1089 –96.
42. Scheib, J. E. and Ruby, A. (2008). ‘Contact among families who share the same sperm donor’. Fertility and Sterility, 90, 33 –43.
43. Scheib, J. and Cushing, R. A. (2007). ‘Open-identity donor insemination in United States: is it on the rise?’ Fertility and Sterility, 88, 231 –2.
44. Scheib, J. E., Riordan, M. and Rubin, S. (2003). ‘Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13–18 years later’. HumanReproduction, 18, 1115 –27.
45. Scheib, J. E. (2005). ‘Adolescents with open-identity sperm donors: reports from 12–17 year olds’. Human Reproduction, 20, 239 –52.
46. Schover, L. R., Rothman, S. A. and Collins, R. L. (1992). ‘The personality and motivation of semen donors: a comparison with oocyte donors’. Human Reproduction, 7, 575 –9.
47. Smart, C. (2010). ‘Family secrets: law and understandings of openness in everyday relationships’. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 551 –67.
48. Snowden, R. (1990). ‘The Family and Artii cial Reproduction’, in D. R. Bromham, M. E. Dalton and J. C. Jack (eds.), Philosophical Ethics inReproductive Medicine. Manchester University Press.
49. Steinberg, L. and Silk, J. S. (2002). ‘Parenting Adolescents’, in M. H. Bornstein (ed.), Handbook of Parenting, Vol. 1, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum sAssociates.
50. Thorn, P., Katzorke, T. and Daniels, K. (2008). ‘Human semen donors in Germany: a study exploring motivations and attitudes’. HumanReproduction, 23, 2415 –20.
51. Turner, A. J. and Coyle, A. (2000). ‘What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy’. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041 –51.
52. Vanfraussen, K., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. and Brewaeys, A. (2001). ‘An attempt to reconstruct children’s donor concept: a comparison between children’s and lesbian parents’ attitudes towards donor anonymity’. Human Reproduction, 16, 2019 –25.
53. Vanfraussen, K., Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, I. and Brewaeys, A. (2003). ‘Why do children want to know more about the donor? The experiences of youngsters raised in lesbian families’. Journal of PsychosomaticObstetrics and Gynecology, 24, 31 –8.
54. Velleman, J. D. (2005). ‘Family history’. Philosophical Papers, 34, 357 –78.
55. Velleman, J. D. (2008). ‘Persons in prospect: II. the gift of life’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36, 245 –66.
56. Wilson, S. (1997). ‘Identity, genealogy and the social family: the case of donor insemination’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 11, 270 –97.