Openness of information in the use of donor gametes: Developments in New Zealand

Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 57-68

  Daniels, K ^a   Lewis, Gillian M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038453089     PISSN: 02646838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02646839608405859     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Fertility Society, Ethics Committee (1986) Ethical considerations of the new repro-ductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility, 46: 36S-38S.
2. Anonymous (1984) Dagens Nyheter (Daily News), 4 April 1984.
3. Austria (1992) Federal Law on Medically Assisted Procreation, Austria: National Council.
4. Baran, A. and Pannor, R. (1989) Lethal Secrets. Warner Books, New York.
5. Daniels, K. (1994) The Swedish Insemination Act and its impact. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34: 437-439.
6. Daniels, K. R. (1988) Artificial insemination using donor semen and the issue of secrecy: the views of donors and recipient couples. Social Science and Medicine, 27: 377-383.
7. Daniels, K. R. (1995) Information sharing in DI - a conflict of needs and rights. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 4: 217-224.
8. Daniels, K. R. and Lalos, O. (1995) The Swedish Insemination Act and the availability of donors. Human Reproduction, 10: 1871-1874.
9. Daniels, K. R. and Lewis, G. M. (1996) Donor insemination: the gifting and selling of semen. Social Science and Medicine, 32: in press.
10. Daniels, K. R. and Taylor, K. (1993) Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12: 155-170.
11. Demack, A. G. (1984) Report of the Special Committee Appointed by the Queensland Government to Enquire into the Laws Relating to Artificial Insemination, In Vitro Fertilization and Other Related Matters. State of Queensland, Australia.
12. EckMenning, B. (1981) Donor insemination: the psychosocial issues. Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology, 18: 155-172.
13. Edvinsson, A., Forsman, L., Milson, I. and Nordfors, G. (1990) Givarinsemination vid Manlig Infertilitet: Slut pa en Epok? [Donor insemination for male infertility: the end of an era?] LŠkartidningen, 87: 1871-1872.
14. Hagenfeldt, K. (1990) Givarinsemination: Behandlingsmetod i Kris [Donor insemination: a treatment in crisis]. LŠkartidningen, 87: 1849-1850.
15. Humphrey, M. and Humphrey, H. (1988) Families with a Difference: varieties of surrogate parenthood. Roudedge, London.
16. Knoppers, B. M. and LeBris, S. (1991) Recent advances in medically assisted conception: legal, ethical, and social issues. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 17: 329-361.
17. Lusk, J. (1988) The importance of children having knowledge about their parents. In: Bruce, N., Mitchell, A. and Priestly, K. (Eds), Truth and the Child: a contribution to the debate on the Warnock Report. Family Care, Edinburgh.
18. McMichael, A. (1980) Social aspects. In: Wood, C., Leeton, J. and Kovacs, G. (Eds), Artificial Insemination by Donor, Brown Prior Andersen, Melbourne.
19. McWhinnie, A. M. (1984) Annex: the case for greater openness concerning AID. In AID and After: papers from BAAF, BASW and a Scottish Working Party. British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering, London.
20. Ministerial Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (1994) Assisted Human Reproduction - Navigating Our Future, Wellington: New Zealand Government Printers.
21. Mitchell, G. D. (1982) Family making by AID. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2: 69-74.
22. National Bioethics Consultative Committee (1988) Access to Information: an analogy between adoption and the use of gamete donation (Background paper prepared for the Committee and Appendix to the Report of the Committee (1991)). Commonwealth of Australia.
23. New Zealand Status of Children Amendment Act (1987) New Zealand House of Representatives, Wellington.
24. Purdie, A., Peek, J. C., Irwin, R., Ellis, J., Graham, F. M. and Fisher, P. R. (1992) Identifiable semen donors - attitudes of donors and recipient couples. New Zealand Medical Journal, 105: 27-28.
25. Purdie, A., Peek, J. C., Adair, V., Graham, F. and Fisher, R. (1994) Attitudes of parents of young children to sperm donation - implications for donor recruitment. Human Reproduction, 9: 1355-1358.
26. Rowland, R. (1985) The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor (AID) programmes. Social Science and Medicine, 21: 391-396.
27. Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (Canada) (1993) Proceed with Care. The Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, Volume 1. Minister of Government Services, Ottawa.
28. Singer, P. and Wells, D. (1984) The Reproduction Revolution: new ways of making babies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Snowden, R. and Mitchell, G. D. (1981) The Artificial Family: a consideration of artificial insemination by donor. George Allen & Unwin, London.
30. Snowden, R., Mitchell, G. D. and Snowden, E. M. (1983) Artificial Reproduction: a social investigation. George Allen & Unwin, London.
31. Spiers, J. (1988) Children's rights to know their identity: social work perspective. In: Bruce, N., Mitchell, A. and Priestly, K. (Eds), Truth and the Child: a contribution to the debate on the Warnock Report. Family Care, Edinburgh.
32. Sverne, T. (1983) Children conceived by artificial insemination. Summary of a report of the Insemination Committee. S. O. U. 42: 1-19.
33. Sverne, T. (1990) Bio-technical developments and the law. Changing Family Patterns (UNESCO), 126: 465-493.
34. Sweden (1985) Swedish Law on Artificial Insemination, No. 1140/1984.
35. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (1991) Donor Insemination Figures. N.B.H.W., Sweden.
36. Triseliotis, J. (1993) Donor insemination and the child. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12: 195-197.
37. Waller, L. (1982) Interim Report of the Committee to Consider the Social, Ethical and Legal Issues Arising from In Vitro Fertilization. State of Victoria, Australia.
38. Warnock, M. (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. HMSO, London.
39. Working Party for ART, Manatu Maori (Ministry of Maori Affairs) (1991) Guidelines for the use of assisted reproductive technology. (Appendix E to the report Assisted Human Reproduction - Navigating Our Future, by the Ministerial Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technologies, 1994). New Zealand Government, Wellington.
40. Westerholm, B. (1994) Motion till riksdagen av Barbro Westerholm (fp) Insemination och Šggdonation [Proposal to Parliament: insemination and egg donation] 1994/95: FP852. Swedish Parliament, Stockholm.