Erratum: Impacts of surface water diversions for marijuana cultivation on aquatic habitat in four Northwestern California watersheds (PLoS ONE (2015) 10:3 (e0120016) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0120016);Impacts of surface water diversions for marijuana cultivation on aquatic habitat in four northwestern California watersheds

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Bauer, Scott ^a   Olson, Jennifer ^a   Cockrill, Adam ^a   Van Hattem, Michael ^a   Miller, Linda ^a   Tauzer, Margaret ^b   Leppig, Gordon ^a  

^a California Department of Fish and Wildlife   (United States)

^b SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; SURFACE WATER; WATER;

AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLOW RATE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; PLANT WATER USE; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES CULTIVATION; SURFACE WATER DIVERSION; SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER AND WATER RELATED PHENOMENA; WATER DEMAND; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED; ANIMAL; CALIFORNIA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYDROLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEASON;

AMPHIBIA; CANNABIS SATIVA; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; SALMONIDAE;

ANIMALS; AQUATIC ORGANISMS; CALIFORNIA; CANNABIS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; HYDROLOGY; SEASONS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WATER;

EID: 84925583089     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137935     Document Type: Erratum

References (85)

1. Corva D. Requiem for a CAMP: The life and death of a domestic U.S. drug war institution. Int J Drug Policy. 2014 Jan; 25(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.02.003 PMID: 23561719
2. United States Department of Justice. Domestic cannabis cultivation assessment 2007. Johnstown, PA: National Drug Intelligence Center; 2007.
3. National Drug Control Strategy Data Supplement. Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy; 2013.
4. Arnold JM. Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts Associated With Cannabis Cultivation. M. Sc. Thesis, Humboldt State University. 2013. Available: http://humboldt-dspace.calstate.edu/handle/2148/1461
5. Leeper JS. Humboldt County: its role in the emerald triangle. Calif Geogr. 1990; 30(6):93-109.
6. Humboldt County Planning and Building Department. Forest Resources [Internet]. Humboldt County, CA; 2002 [cited 2014 Feb 24] p. 3.1-3.16. Available: https://co.humboldt.ca.us/gpu/docs/meetings/natl-res/06chapte.pdf
7. Mallery M. Marijuana National Forest: Encroachment on California Public Lands for Cannabis Cultivation. Berkeley Undergrad J. 2011 Jan 1;23(2). Available: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7r10t66s#page-2
8. Gabriel MW, Wengert GM, Higley J, Krogan S, Sargent W, Clifford DL. Silent Forests? Rodenticides on illegal marijuana crops harm wildlife. Wildl Prof. 2013; 7(1):46-50.
9. Milestone JF, Hendricks K, Foster A, Richardson J, Sean D, Demetry A, et al. Continued Cultivation of Illegal Marijuana in U.S. Western National Parks. In: Weber S, editor. Rethinking Protected Areas in a Changing World. Hancock, Michigan: The George Wright Society; 2012.
10. Mills E. The carbon footprint of indoor Cannabis production. Energy Policy. 2012 Jul; 46:58-67.
11. Gabriel MW, Woods LW, Poppenga R, Sweitzer RA, Thompson C, Matthews SM, et al. Anticoagulant Rodenticides on our Public and Community Lands: Spatial Distribution of Exposure and Poisoning of a Rare Forest Carnivore. PLoS ONE. 2012 Jul 13; 7(7):e40163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040163 PMID: 22808110
12. Thompson C, Sweitzer R, Gabriel M, Purcell K, Barrett R, Poppenga R. Impacts of rodenticide and insecticide toxicants from marijuana cultivation sites on fisher survival rates in the Sierra National Forest, California. Conserv Lett. 2013. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12038/abstract
13. State Water Resources Control Board. Marijuana Cultivation on the North Coast Threatens Water Quality and Wildlife. 2013. Available: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/publications-and-forms/available-documents/pdf/2013/130611-MarijuanFactSheet.pdf
14. Western Regional Climate Center. Cooperative Climatological Data Summary [Internet]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2014. Accessed: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmnca.html
15. Cervantes J. Marijuana horticulture: the indoor/outdoor medical grower's bible. Sacramento, CA: Van Patten Pub.; 2006.
16. Williams LE. Irrigation of winegrapes in California. Practical Winery and Vineyard Journal [Internet]. 2001 Dec; Available: http://www.practicalwinery.com/novdec01p42.htm
17. Lytle DA, Poff NL. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004; 19(2):94-100. PMID: 16701235
18. Bunn SE, Arthington AH. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage. 2002; 30(4):492-507. PMID: 12481916
19. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, et al. The natural flow regime. BioScience. 1997; 47(11):769-84.
20. Power ME, Dietrich WE, Finlay JC. Dams and downstream aquatic biodiversity: Potential food web consequences of hydrologic and geomorphic change. Environ Manage. 1996; 20(6):887-95. PMID: 8895411
21. Deitch MJ, Kondolf GM, Merenlender AM. Hydrologic impacts of small-scale instream diversions for frost and heat protection in the California wine country. River Res Appl. 2009; 25(2):118-34.
22. Deitch MJ, Kondolf GM, Merenlender AM. Surface water balance to evaluate the hydrological impacts of small instream diversions and application to the Russian River basin, California, USA. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2009; 19(3):274-84.
23. Starrs PF, Goin P. Field Guide to California Agriculture. University of California Press; 2010. 504 p.
24. Sawyer JO, Keeler-Wolf T, Evens J. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society Press; 2009. 1316 p.
25. Cashman SM, Kelsey HM, Harden DR. Geology of the Redwood Creek Basin, Humboldt County, California. 1995;U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1454-B. Available: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water-issues/programs/tmdl/records/region-1/2003/ref2065.pdf
26. California Interagency Watershed Mapping Committee. California Interagency Watershed Map of 1999 (CalWater2.2.1) [Internet]. 2.2.1 ed. Sacramento, CA: California Interagency Watershed Mapping Committee; 2004. Available: http://www.calfish.org/ProgramsData/ReferenceLayersHydrography/CaliforniaInteragencyWatershedMapof1999.aspx
27. Humboldt Growers Association. Humboldt County Outdoor Medical Cannabis Ordinance Draft [Internet]. 2010. Available: http://library.humboldt.edu/humco/holdings/HGA2.pdf
28. PRWEB. Leading California Marijuana Attorney Says Growers Must Focus on Water Conservation. 2012 Mar 22. Available: http://www.prweb.com/releases/marijuana-attorney/california/prweb9316223.htm. Accessed 22 Jan 2014.
29. Lang M, Love M, Trush W. Improving Stream Crossings for Fish Passage. National Marine Fisheries Service. 2004. Available: http://www.stream.fs.fed.us/fishxing/fplibrary/Lang-2004-Improving-stream-crossing-for-fish-passage-FINAL.pdf
30. Rantz SE. Average annual precipitation and runoff in north coastal California. United States Geological Survey. 1968. Report No.: HA - 298. Available: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ha298
31. Rantz SE. Surface-water hydrology of coastal basins of northern California. United States Geological Survey. 1964. Report No.: WSP - 1758. Available: http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc-24932.htm
32. DeOreo WB, Mayer P, Martien L, Hayden M, Funk A, Kramer-Duffield M, et al. California Single Family Water Use Efficiency Study [Internet]. Boulder, Colorado: Aquacraft Water Engineering and Management; 2011 Jun. Available: http://www.irwd.com/images/pdf/save-water/CaSingleFamilyWaterUseEfficiencyStudyJune2011.pdf
33. Bailey LH. The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture: I. A-E. 1935. 1200 p.
34. Journal of Agricultural Research. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1915. 704 p.
35. Howell TA. Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron J. 2001; 93(2):281-9.
36. Jensen ME. Water Consumption by Agricultural Plants. In: Kozlowski TT, editor. Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Vol 2. New York: Academic Press Inc; 1968. Available from: http://eprints.nwisrl.ars.usda.gov/742/1/92.pdf
37. North Coast Water Quality Control Board. Water Quality Control Plan for the North Coast Region. Santa Rosa, CA; 2011. Available: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/water-issues/programs/basin-plan/083105-bp/basin-plan.pdf
38. Arismendi I, Safeeq M, Johnson SL, Dunham JB, Haggerty R. Increasing synchrony of high temperature and low flow in western North American streams: double trouble for coldwater biota? Hydrobiologia. 2013 Jul; 712(1):61-70.
39. Ricketts TH. Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 1999.
40. Abell RA. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press; 2000.
41. Special Animals List [Internet]. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Diversity Database; 2015. Available: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/SPAnimals.pdf
42. Kelsey KA, West SD. Riparian Wildlife. In: Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Kantor S, editors. River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
43. California Department of Fish and Game. Recovery Strategy for California Coho Salmon: Report to the California Fish and Game Commission. The California Resources Agency; 2004. Available: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/fish/documents/SAL-SH/SAL-Coho-Recovery/ReportToCommission-2004/CohoRecoveryStrategy.pdf
44. Moyle PB. Inland fishes of California. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.
45. Katz J, Moyle PB, Quiñones RM, Israel J, Purdy S. Impending extinction of salmon, steelhead, and trout (Salmonidae) in California. Environ Biol Fishes. 2012 Jan 31; 96(10-11):1169-86.
46. Marine KR, Cech JJ. Effects of High Water Temperature on Growth, Smoltification, and Predator Avoidance in Juvenile Sacramento River Chinook Salmon. North Am J Fish Manag. 2004; 24(1):198-210.
47. Suttle KB, Power ME, Levine JM, McNeely C. How fine sediment in riverbeds impairs growth and survival of juvenile salmonids. Ecol Appl. 2004 Aug 1; 14(4):969-74.
48. Silver SJ, Warren CE, Doudoroff P. Dissolved Oxygen Requirements of Developing Steelhead Trout and Chinook Salmon Embryos at Different Water Velocities. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1963; 92(4):327-43.
49. Stevens PW, Blewett DA, Casey JP. Short-term effects of a low dissolved oxygen event on estuarine fish assemblages following the passage of hurricane Charley. Estuaries Coasts. 2006 Dec 1; 29(6):997-1003.
50. Moore MK, Townsend VR. The Interaction of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen and Predation Pressure in an Aquatic Predator-Prey System. Oikos. 1998 Mar; 81(2):329.
51. Harvey BC, Nakamoto RJ, White JL. Reduced Streamflow Lowers Dry-Season Growth of Rainbow Trout in a Small Stream. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2006; 135(4):998-1005.
52. Bondi C, Yarnell S, Lind A, Lind A. Transferability of habitat suitability criteria for a stream breeding frog (Rana boylii) in the Sierra Nevada, California. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2013; 8(1):88-103.
53. Pilliod DS, Wind E, editors. Habitat Management Guidelines for Amphibians and Reptiles of the Northwestern United States and Western Canada. Birmingham, AL: Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation; 2008. 139 p.
54. Ray C. Vital Limits and Rates of Desiccation in Salamanders. Ecology. 1958 Jan 1; 39(1):75-83.
55. Bury RB. Low thermal tolerances of stream amphibians in the Pacific Northwest: Implications for riparian and forest management. Appl Herpetol. 2008 Jan 1; 5(1):63-74.
56. Welsh HH Jr, Lind AJ. Habitat correlates of the southern torrent salamander, Rhyacotriton variegatus (Caudata: Rhyacotritonidae), in northwestern California. J Herpetol. 1996;385-98.
57. Welsh HH, Hodgson GR. Amphibians as metrics of critical biological thresholds in forested headwater streams of the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A. Freshw Biol. 2008; 53(7):1470-88.
58. Welsh HH, Ollivier LM. Stream amphibians as indicators of ecosystem stress: a case study from California's redwoods. Ecol Appl. 1998; 8(4):1118-32.
59. Kupferberg SJ, Palen WJ, Lind AJ, Bobzien S, Catenazzi A, Drennan J, et al. Effects of flow regimes altered by dams on survival, population declines, and range-wide losses of California river-breeding frogs. Conserv Biol J Soc Conserv Biol. 2012 Jun; 26(3):513-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01837.x PMID: 22594596
60. Lannoo MJ, editor. Amphibian Declines: The Conservation Status of United States Species. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005.
61. Wake DB, Vredenburg VT. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008 Aug 11; 105(Supplement 1):11466-73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801921105 PMID: 18695221
62. Clipp HL, Anderson JT. Environmental and Anthropogenic Factors Influencing Salamanders in Riparian Forests: A Review. Forests. 2014 Nov 13; 5(11):2679-702.
63. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, et al. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 2006; 81(2):163-82. PMID: 16336747
64. Gleick PH. Water Use. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2003; 28(1):275-314.
65. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature. 2010 Sep 30; 467(7315):555-61. doi: 10.1038/nature09440 PMID: 20882010
66. Averyt K, Meldrum J, Caldwell P, Sun G, McNulty S, Huber-Lee A, et al. Sectoral contributions to surface water stress in the coterminous United States. Environ Res Lett. 2013 Sep 1; 8(3):035046.
67. Tockner K, Bunn S, Gordon C, Naiman RJ, Quinn GP, Stanford JA. Flood plains: Critically threatened ecosystems. 2008. p. 45-61. Available: http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/handle/10072/23618
68. Gleick PH, Palaniappan M. Peak water limits to freshwater withdrawal and use. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010 May 24; 107(25):11155-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004812107 PMID: 20498082
69. Snyder MA, Bell JL, Sloan LC, Duffy PB, Govindasamy B. Climate responses to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide for a climatically vulnerable region. Geophys Res Lett. 2002; 29(11):9-1-9-4.
70. Kim J, Kim T-K, Arritt RW, Miller NL. Impacts of Increased Atmospheric CO2 on the Hydroclimate of the- Western United States. J Clim. 2002; 15(14):1926-42.
71. Snyder MA, Sloan LC, Bell JL. Modeled Regional Climate Change in the Hydrologic Regions of California: A Co2 Sensitivity Study. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2004; 40(3):591-601.
72. Snyder MA, Sloan LC. Transient future climate over the western United States using a regional climate model. Earth Interact. 2005; 9(11):1-21.
73. Leung LR, Qian Y, Bian X, Washington WM, Han J, Roads JO. Mid-Century Ensemble Regional Climate Change Scenarios for the Western United States. Clim Change. 2004 Jan 1; 62(1-3):75-113.
74. Shaw MR, Pendleton L, Cameron DR, Morris B, Bachelet D, Klausmeyer K, et al. The impact of climate change on California's ecosystem services. Clim Change. 2011 Dec 1; 109(1):465-84.
75. Knowles N, Cayan DR. Potential effects of global warming on the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed and the San Francisco estuary. Geophys Res Lett. 2002; 29(18):38-1-38-4.
76. Miller NL, Bashford KE, Strem E. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on California Hydrology. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2003; 39(4):771-84.
77. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, et al. Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(34):12422-7. PMID: 15314227
78. Schlenker W, Hanemann WM, Fisher AC. Water Availability, Degree Days, and the Potential Impact of Climate Change on Irrigated Agriculture in California. Clim Change. 2007 Mar 1; 81(1):19-38. PMID: 17415585
79. Mayer TD, Naman SW. Streamflow Response to Climate as Influenced by Geology and Elevation. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2011 Aug 1; 47(4):724-38.
80. Poff NL, Brinson MM, Day JW Jr. Aquatic ecosystems and global climate change. Pew Cent Glob Clim Change Arlingt VA. 2002; 44.
81. Mohseni O, Stefan HG, Eaton JG. Global Warming and Potential Changes in Fish Habitat in U.S. Streams. Clim Change. 2003 Aug 1; 59(3):389-409.
82. Yates D, Galbraith H, Purkey D, Huber-Lee A, Sieber J, West J, et al. Climate warming, water storage, and Chinook salmon in California's Sacramento Valley. Clim Change. 2008 Jun 4; 91(3-4):335-50.
83. Wenger SJ, Isaak DJ, Luce CH, Neville HM, Fausch KD, Dunham JB, et al. Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011 Aug 15; 108(34):14175-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103097108 PMID: 21844354
84. O'Neal K. Effects of Global Warming on Trout and Salmon in U.S. Streams [Internet]. The Natural Resources Defense Council; 2002. Available: http://www.defenders.org/publications/effects-of-global-warming-on-trout-and-salmon.pdf
85. Madej MA. Analysis of Trends in Climate, Streamflow, and Stream Temperature in North Coastal California. Proceedings of the Fourth Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds. United States Geological Survey; 2011.