Effects of Flow Regimes Altered by Dams on Survival, Population Declines, and Range-Wide Losses of California River-Breeding Frogs

Conservation Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 513-524

  Kupferberg, Sarah J ^a   Palen, Wendy J ^b   Lind, Amy J ^c   Bobzien, Steve ^d   Catenazzi, Alessandro ^e   Drennan, Joe ^f   Power, Mary E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^d East Bay Regional Park District   (United States)

^e GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Garcia and Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphibian declines; hydropower; Natural flow regime; Pulsed flows; Rana boylii; Rana draytonii

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; DAM; DROUGHT; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; FLOOD; FLOW PATTERN; FLOW REGULATION; FROG; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; LOVE WAVE; MORTALITY; NATIVE SPECIES; PERSISTENCE; PHENOLOGY; POPULATION DECLINE; POPULATION DENSITY; RIVER FLOW; SURVIVAL; SYNCHRONY; TIME SERIES;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RANIDAE; RIVER; SEASON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES; WATER FLOW;

ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RANIDAE; RIVERS; SEASONS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WATER MOVEMENTS;

CALIFORNIA; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; RANA AURORA DRAYTONII; RANA BOYLII;

EID: 84861125596     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01837.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Altig, R., and G. F. Johnston 1989. Guilds of anuran larvae: relationships among developmental modes, morphologies, and habitats. Herpetological Monographs 3:81-109.
2. Beechie, T., E. Buhle, M. Ruckelshaus, A. Fullerton, and L. Holsinger 2006. Hydrologic regime and the conservation of salmon life history diversity. Biological Conservation 130:560-572.
3. Biek, R., W. C. Funk, B. A. Maxwell, and L. S. Mills 2002. What is missing in amphibian decline research? Insights from ecological sensitivity analysis. Conservation Biology 16:728-734.
4. Borisenko, A. N., and M. P. Hayes 1999. Status of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) in Oregon. Final report under contract ORFO080197-1 to The Nature Conservancy contract 1448-13420-7-M262. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland.
5. Borisenko, A. N. 2000. The status of Rana boylii in Oregon: analysis of selected biotic and abiotic variables at historical Rana boylii locations. M.S. thesis. Portland State University, Portland, Oregon
6. Bourque, R. M. 2008. Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana boylii) in Tehama Co, CA. X. California State University, Humboldt
7. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York
8. Brown, L. R., and T. Ford 2002. Effects of flow on the fish communities of a regulated California river: implications for managing native fishes. River Research and Applications 18:331-342.
9. Brumo, A. F. 2006. Spawning, larval recruitment, and early life survival of Pacific lampreys in the south fork Coquille River, Oregon. M.S. thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis
10. Bunn, S. E., and A. H. Arthington 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30:492-507.
11. Bury, R. B., and D. J. Germano 2008. Actinemys marmorata (Baird and Girard 1852) - western pond turtle, Pacific pond turtle. Pages 001.1-001.9 in A. G. Rhodin, P. C. H. Pritchard, P. P. van Dijk, R. A. Saumure, K. A. Buhlmann, and J. B. Iverson, editors. Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: a compilation project of the IUCN-SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monograph No. 5.
12. Colwell, R. K. 1974. Predictability, constancy, and contingency of periodic phenomena. Ecology 55:1148-1153.
13. Congdon, J. D., A. E. Dunham, and R. C. van Loben Sels 1993. Delayed sexual maturity and demographics of Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. Conservation Biology 7:826-833.
14. Cushman, R. M. 1985. Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream from hydroelectric facilities. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 5:330-339.
15. Daszak, P., D. E. Scott, A. M. Kilpatrick, C. Faggioni, J. W. Gibbons, and D. Porter 2005. Amphibian population declines at Savannah River site are linked to climate, not chytridiomycosis. Ecology 86:3232-3237.
16. Davidson, C., H. B. Shaffer, and M. R. Jennings 2002. Spatial test of pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines. Conservation Biology 16:1588-1601.
17. Davidson, C. 2004. Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use. Ecological Applications 14:1992-1992.
18. Dudgeon, D. 2000. Large-scale hydrological changes in tropical Asia: prospects for riverine biodiversity. BioScience 50:793-806.
19. Gordon, E., and R. K. Meentemeyer 2006. Effects of dam operation and land use on stream channel morphology and riparian vegetation. Geomorphology 82:412-429.
20. Grabowski, T. B., and J. J. Isely 2007. Effects of flow fluctuations on the spawning habitat of a riverine fish. Southeastern Naturalist 6:471-478.
21. Grantham, T. E., A. M. Merenlender, and V. H. Resh 2010. Climatic influences and anthropogenic stressors: an integrated framework for stream flow management in Mediterranean-climate California, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 55(Supplement 1):188-204.
22. Hall, D. G. 2006. A study of United States hydroelectric plant ownership. INL/EXT-06-11519. U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls
23. Haley, L., M. Ellis, and J. Cook 2007. Reproductive timing of freshwater mussels and potential impacts of pulsed flows on reproductive success. CEC-500-2007-09.California Energy Commission, Energy-Related Environmental Research Program, Sacramento Available from (accessed June 2011).
24. International Commission on Large Dams. 1997. Position paper on dams and the environment. International Commission on Large Dams, Paris Available from (accessed April 2011).
25. Jennings, M. R., and M. P. Hayes 1994. Amphibian and reptile species of special concern in California. Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Rancho Cordova
26. Jennings, M. R. 1996. Status of amphibians. Pages 921-944 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: final report to Congress. Volume II. Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis Available from (accessed April 2011).
27. Kondolf, G. M., R. Kattelmann, M. Embury, and D. C. Erman 1996. Status of riparian habitat. Pages 36-1-36-2 in Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: final report to Congress. Volume II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Report 88. Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis
28. Kupferberg, S. J. 1996. Hydrologic and geomorphic factors affecting reproduction of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii). Ecological Applications 6:1332-1344.
29. Kupferberg, S. J., A. J. Lind, V. Thill, and S. M. Yarnell 2011. Water velocity tolerance in tadpoles of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii): swimming performance, growth, and survival. Copeia 2011:141-152.
30. Layzer, J. B., and L. M. Madison 1995. Microhabitat use by fresh-water mussels and recommendations for determining their instream flow needs. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 10:329-345.
31. Lind, A. J. 2005. Reintroduction of a declining amphibian: determining an ecologically feasible approach for the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) through analysis of decline factors, genetic structure, and habitat associations. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Davis
32. Lind, A. J., H. H. Welsh Jr., and R. A. Wilson 1996. The effects of a dam on breeding habitat and egg survival of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) in northwestern California. Herpetological Review 27:62-67.
33. Loman, J., and G. Andersson 2007. Monitoring brown frogs Rana arvalis and Rana temporaria in 120 south Swedish ponds 1989-2005. Mixed trends in different habitats. Biological Conservation 135:46-56.
34. Lytle, D. A., and N. L. Poff 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:94-100.
35. Meyer, A. H., B. R. Schmidt, and K. Grossenbacher 1998. Analysis of three amphibian populations with quarter-century long time-series. Proceedings Royal Society Biological Science 265:523-528.
36. Moyle, P. B., and T. Light 1996. Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biological Conservation 78:149-161.
37. NatureServe. 2010. NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia Available from (accessed March 2011).
38. Pinheiro, J. C., and D. M. Bates 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing Series, Springer-Verlag, New York
39. Poff, N. L., J. D. Olden, D. M. Merritt, and D. M. Pepin 2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 104:5732-5737.
40. Poff, N. L., and J. K. H. Zimmerman 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform environmental flows science and management. Freshwater Biology 55:194-205.
41. Poff, N. L., et al. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55:147-170.
42. Power, M. E., W. E. Dietrich, and J. C. Finlay 1996. Dams and downstream aquatic biodiversity: potential foodweb consequences of hydrologic disturbance and geomorphic change. Environmental Management 20:887-895.
43. Rehn, A. C. 2009. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of biological condition below hydropower dams on west slope Sierra Nevada streams, California, USA. River Research and Applications 25:208-228.
44. Ricciardi, A., and J. B. Rasmussen 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13:1220-1222.
45. Richter, B. D., D. P. Braun, M. A. Mendelson, and L. L. Master 1997. Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 11:1081-1093.
46. Richter, B. D., R. Matthews, D. L. Harrison, and R. Wigington 2003. Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for river integrity. Ecological Applications 13:206-224.
47. Strange, E. M., P. B. Moyle, and T. C. Foin 1992. Interactions between stochastic and deterministic processes in stream fish community assembly. Environmental Biology of Fishes 36:1-15.
48. Sydeman, W. J., and S. J. Bograd 2009. Marine ecosystems, climate and phenology: introduction. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393:185-188.
49. Tatarian, P. J. 2008. Movement patterns of California red-legged frogs (Rana draytonii) in an inland California environment. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 3:155-169.
50. Underwood, A. J. 1994. On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications 4:3-15.
51. Visser, M. E., and C. Both 2005. Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272:2561-2569.
52. Vonesh, J. R., and O. De la Cruz 2002. Complex life cycles and density dependence: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines. Oecologia 133:325-333.
53. Wake, D. B., and V. T. Vredenburg 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:11466-11473.