A Conceptual Framework for the Effect Evaluation of the Intelligent Bed

Wireless Personal Communications

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1405-1414

  Cai, Hao ^a   Toft, Egon ^a   Dinesen, Birthe ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Case study; Effect evaluation; Technology acceptance model; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Wireless technology

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL COMPUTING; TELEMEDICINE;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; EFFECT EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TELEHEALTH; WIRELESS SENSOR TECHNOLOGY; WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84925498684     PISSN: 09296212     EISSN: 1572834X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-014-2090-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kidholm, K., Ekeland, A. G., Jensen, L. K., Rasmussen, J., Pedersen, C. D., Bowes, A., et al. (2012). A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: Mast. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(1), 44–51. doi:10.1017/S0266462311000638.
2. Bygholm, A., & Kanstrup, A. M. (2014). Learning from an Ambient Assisted Living Lab: The case of the intelligent bed. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 205, 318–322.
3. Kanstrup, A. M., & Bertelsen, P. (2011). User innovation management, a handbook. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
4. Saliba, V., Legido-Quigley, H., Hallik, R., Aaviksoo, A., Car, J., & McKee, M. (2012). Telemedicine across borders: A systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(12), 793–809. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.003.
5. Wootton, R. (2012). Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management-an evidence synthesis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 18(4), 211–220. doi:10.1258/jtt.2012.120219.
6. World Health Organization. (2012). Home Care Across Europe, current structure and future challenges.
7. Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research design and methods. London: SAGE.
8. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: SAGE.
9. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London: SAGE.
10. Israel, A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (2012). Methods for community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London: SAGE.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. doi:10.2307/249008.
13. Tidd, J., & Bessant, (2009). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. London: Wiley.
14. Kuada, J. E. (2003). Culture and technological transformation in the South: Transfer or local innovation. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
15. Ketikidis, P., Dimitrovski, T., Lazuras, L., & Bath, P. A. (2012). Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics Journal, 18(2), 124–134. doi:10.1177/1460458211435425.
16. Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002.
17. Gagnon, M. P., Orruno, E., Asua, J., Abdeljelil, A. B., & Emparanza, J. (2012). Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals’ adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(1), 54–59. doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0066.
18. Sherer, S. A. (2010). Information systems and healthcare XXXIII: An institutional theory perspective on physician adoption of electronic health records. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(7), 127.
19. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
20. Evans, H. H. (1993). High tech vs ‘high touch’: The impact of medical technology on patient care. In J. M. Clair, R. M. Allman (Eds.), Sociomedical perspectives on patient care (pp. 82–95). Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
21. Valero, M. A., Arredondo, M. T., Guillen, S., Traver, V., Fernandez, C., Basagoiti, I., et al. (2001). Impact of a broadband interactive televisit/teleconsultation service for residential and working environments. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium, 721–725.
22. Kuszler, P. C. (1999). Telemedicine and integrated health care delivery: Compounding malpractice liability. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 25, 297–326.
23. Brigden, M., Minty, A., Pilatzke, S., Della, Vidov, L., Sherrington, L., et al. (2008). A survey of recipient client physician satisfaction with teleoncology services originating from thunder bay regional health sciences centre. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14(3), 250–254.
24. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2008). Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.