A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: Mast

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 44-51

  Kidholm, Kristian ^a   Ekeland, Anne Granstrøm ^b   Jensen, Lise Kvistgaard ^a   Rasmussen, Janne ^a   Pedersen, Claus Duedal ^a   Bowes, Alison ^c   Flottorp, Signe Agnes ^b   Bech, Mickael ^d  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b Norwegian Center for Intergrated Care and Telemedicine   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Assessment model; EUnetHTA; HTA; Telemedicine application

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT MODELS; COST-EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DECISION MAKERS; EUNETHTA; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; FUTURE ASSESSMENT; HEALTHCARE SECTORS; HTA; TELEMEDICINE APPLICATION;

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; RATING;

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; MODEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF TELEMEDICINE APPLICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; TELEMEDICINE; WORKSHOP;

DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EDUCATION; EUROPE; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SOFTWARE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84859039613     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462311000638     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arlbjørn JS. Process optimization with simple means: The power of visualization. Ind Commer Train. 2011;43:151-159.
2. Barlow J. Building an evidence base for successful telecare implementation - updated report of the Evidence Working Group of the Telecare Policy Collaborative chaired by James Barlow-November 2006.
3. Commission Communication: Telemedicine for the benefit of patients, healthcare systems and societies. COM/2008/689 final. http:// eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0689: FIN:EN:PDF. (accessed August 1, 2011)
4. CONSORT statement for RCTs. .
5. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Mitchie S, Nazareth I, Mark P. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;33:979-983.
6. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, et al. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: Effects on professional practice and health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD002098.
7. Drummond M, Griffin A, Tarricone R. Economic evaluation for devices and drugs - same or different? Value Health. 2009;12:402-404.
8. Drummond M, Manca A, Sculpher M. Increasing the generalizability of economic evaluations: Recommendations for the design, analysis, and reporting of studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21: 165-171. (Pubitemid 40656544)
9. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman D, eds. Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.
10. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:736-771.
11. EUnetHTA. HTA Adaptation toolkit - work package 5. October 2008. Toolkit-October08.pdf. (accessed August 1, 2011)
12. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(Suppl 1):1-7.
13. Hersh WR, Helfand M,Wallace J, et al. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine intervention: A systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001;1:5.
14. Hersch WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, Helfand M. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: Update. 2006 Evidence Report/ Technology Assessment No. 131 (Prepared by the Oregon Evidencebased Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0024.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-E007. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
15. Lampe K, Mäkelä M, Garrido MV, et al. The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:9-20.
16. Lampe K, Anttila H, Pasternack I. HTA core model handbook. https://fio.stakes.fi/htacore/handbook.html (accessed February 18, 2009).
17. MAST-Manual. overview/assessment-method. (accessed August 1, 2011)
18. Ohinmaa A, Hailey D, Roine R. Elements for assessment of telemedicine applications. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17:190-202. (Pubitemid 32574957)
19. Scott RE, McCarthy FG, Jennett PA, et al. Telehealth outcomes: A synthesis of the literature and recommendations for outcome indicators. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(Suppl 2):1-38.
20. ScrivenM. Evaluation thesaurus. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1991.
21. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: Reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med. 2010;8: 24.
22. Taylor P. Evaluating telemedicine systems and services. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:167-177. (Pubitemid 40848122)
23. The Lewin Group, Inc. Assessment of approaches to evaluating telemedicine. Prepared for: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services. Contract Number: HHS-10-97-0012, 2000.
24. Whitten PS, Mair FS, Haycox A, May CR, Williams TL, Hellmich S. Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. Br Med J. 2002;324:1434-1437. (Pubitemid 34634237)