Effects of using renewable fuels on vehicle emissions

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 47, Issue , 2015, Pages 162-172

  Anderson, Larry G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; Bioethanol; Biofuels; Biomethane; Compressed natural gas; Transport

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; BIOETHANOL; COMBUSTION; COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS; DIESEL FUELS; EMISSION CONTROL; ETHANOL; FOSSIL FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; METHANE; NITROGEN OXIDES;

BIO-ETHANOLS; BIOMETHANE; COMBUSTION PRO-CESS; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSES GAS; MOTOR VEHICLE; NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS; RENEWABLE FUELS; TRANSPORT; VEHICLE EMISSION;

BIODIESEL;

EID: 84925450089     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.011     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Exxon Mobil. The outlook for energy: a view to 2040, ; 2014 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 58.
2. Prugh T. Biofuel Production Declines. Worldwatch Institute 2014, ; 2014 (last accessed June 25, 2014).
3. Farrell AE, Sperling D. A low-carbon fuel standard for California, Part 1: Technical analysis, UCD-ITS-RR-07-07 Davis, California, ; 2007 (last accessed June 25, 2014). p. 181.
4. Natural & bio Gas Vehicle Association Europe. Sweden, ; 2014. July 1, 2014.
5. LG. Anderson Ethanol fuel use in Brazil: air quality impacts Energy Environ Sci 2 2009 1015 1037
6. LG. Anderson Effects of biodiesel fuels use on vehicle emissions J Sustainable Energy Environ 3 2012 35 47
7. Anderson LG, Wilkes EB. Effects of oxygenated fuels use on I/M240 emissions test results in colorado. In: Air and waste management association annual meeting; 1998.
8. MZ. Jacobson Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States Environ Sci Technol 41 2007 4150 4157
9. S López-Aparicio, and C. Hak Evaluation of the use of bioethanol fuelled buses based on ambient air pollution screening and on-road measurements Sci Total Environ 452-453 2013 40 49
10. A Salvo, and FM. Geiger Reduction in local ozone levels in urban Sao Paulo due to a shift from ethanol to gasoline use Nat Geosci 7 2014 450 458
11. S. Madronich Atmospheric chemistry: ethanol and ozone Nat Geosci 7 2014 395 397
12. T Nogueira, PA Dominutti, LRF de Carvalho, A Fornaro, and Andrade MdF. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde measurements in urban atmosphere impacted by the use of ethanol biofuel: metropolitan area of Sao Paulo (MASP), 2012-2013 Fuel 134 2014 505 513
13. EG. Giakoumis A statistical investigation of biodiesel effects on regulated exhaust emissions during transient cycles Appl Energy 98 2012 273 291
14. TM Cahill, and RA. Okamoto Emissions of acrolein and other aldehydes from biodiesel-fueled heavy-duty vehicles Environ Sci Technol 46 2012 8382 8388
15. T Hesterberg, C Lapin, and W. Bunn A comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas Environ Sci Technol 42 2008 6437 6445
16. WG Wang, NN Clark, DW Lyons, RM Yang, M Gautam, and RM Bata et al. Emissions comparisons from alternative fuel buses and diesel buses with a chassis dynamometer testing facility Environ Sci Technol 31 1997 3132 3137
17. RL McCormick, MS Graboski, TL Alleman, and J. Yanowitz Idle emissions from heavy-duty diesel and natural gas vehicles at high altitude J Air Waste Manage 50 2000 1992 1998
18. Chandler K, Norton P, Clark N. Dallas area rapid transit's (DART) LNG bus fleet: final results, NREL/BR-540-28739 Golden, Colorado, ; 2000 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 47.
19. Northeast Advanced Vehicle Consortium, M. J. Bradley & Associates, West Virginia University. Hybrid-electric drive heavy-duty vehicle testing project: final emissions report, NAVC1098-PG009837 Boston, MA, ; 2000 (last accessed April 7, 2014). p. 74.
20. BA Holmen, and A. Ayala Ultrafine PM emissions from natural gas, oxidation-catalyst diesel, and particle-trap diesel heavy-duty transit buses Environ Sci Technol 36 2002 5041 5050
21. Seguelong T, Coroller P, Plassat G. Comparative study on exhaust emissions from diesel- and CNG-powered urban buses. In: Diesel engine emissions reduction conference, Newport, Rhode Island, ; 2003 (last accessed April 7, 2014).
22. Lowell DM, Parsley W, Bush C, Zupo D. Comparison of clean diesel buses to CNG buses. Diesel engine emissions reduction (DEER) workshop Newport, Rhode Island 2003, ; 2003 (last accessed April 7, 2014).
23. WS Wayne, NN Clark, RD Nine, and D. Elefante A comparison of emissions and fuel economy from hybrid-electric and conventional-drive transit buses Energy Fuel 18 2004 257 270
24. 2 in exhausts of heavy-duty diesel trucks and transit buses by HPLC following 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine cartridge collection Environ Sci Technol 38 2004 5968 5976
25. Nylund N, Erkkilä K, Lappi M, Ikonen M. Transit bus emission study: comparison of emissions from diesel and natural gas buses, PRO3/P5150/04, ; 2004 (last accessed March 25, 2014).p. 63.
26. NY Kado, RA Okamoto, PA Kuzmicky, R Kobayashi, A Ayala, and ME Gebel et al. Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles Environ Sci Technol 39 2005 7638 7649
27. Melendez M, Taylor J, Zuboy J, Wayne WS, Smith D. Emission Testing of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) natural gas and diesel transit buses, NREL/TP-540-36355 Golden, Colorado, ; 2005 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 40.
28. RA Okamoto, NY Kado, PA Kuzmicky, A Ayala, and R. Kobayashi Unregulated emissions from compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses configured with and without oxidation catalyst Environ Sci Technol 40 2006 332 341
29. Kappanna HK. Reduction of toxic air contaminants (TACs) and particulate matter emissions from heavy-duty natural gas engines. Morgantown, West Virginia: West Virginia University, ; 2006 (last accessed April 7, 2014).
30. Nylund N-O, Erkkilä K, Clark N, Rideout G. Evaluation of duty cycles for heavy-duty urban vehicles, VTT research notes 2396, ; 2007 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 96.
31. Hausberger S, Vuckovic T. Emissions and Fuel Consumption of Clean City Bus Concepts, FVT-85/06 Graz, Austria 2007, ; 2007 (last accessed April 7, 2014).
32. WS Wayne, NN Clark, AS Khan, M Gautam, GJ Thompson, and DW. Lyons Regulated and non-regulated emissions and fuel economy from conventional diesel, hybrid-electric diesel, and natural gas transit buses J Transp Res Forum 47 2008 105 125
33. A. Padmavathy Evaluation of exhaust after-treatment device effectiveness in reducing regulated and unregulated emissions from natural gas fueled heavy duty transit bus 2008 West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia
34. ER Jayaratne, ZD Ristovski, N Meyer, and L. Morawska Particle and gaseous emissions from compressed natural gas and ultralow sulphur diesel-fuelled buses at four steady engine loads Sci Total Environ 407 2009 2845 2852
35. Gautam M, Thiruvengadam A, Carder D, Besch MC, Shade B, Thompson G, et al. Testing of volatile and nonvolatile emissions from advanced technology natural gas vehicles, 07-340 Morgantown, WV, ; 2011 (last accessed April 7, 2014). p. 75.
36. Nylund N-O, Koponen K. Fuel and technology alternatives for buses: overall energy efficiency and emission performance, T46, ; 2012 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 402.
37. M Hajbabaei, G Karavalakis, KC Johnson, L Lee, and TD. Durbin Impact of natural gas fuel composition on criteria, toxic, and particle emissions from transit buses equipped with lean burn and stoichiometric engines Energy 62 2013 425 434
38. S Yoon, J Collins, A Thuruvengadam, M Gautam, J Herner, and A. Ayala Criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies J Air Waste Manage 63 2013 926 933
39. Willner K. Testing unregulated emissions from heavy duty natural gas vehicles, SGC Rapport 2013:289 Malmo, Sweden, ; 2013 (last accessed April 7, 2014). p. 67.
40. M.J. Bradley & Associates. Comparison of modern CNG, diesel and diesel hybrid-electric transit buses: efficiency & environmental performance, Concord, MA, ; 2013 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 23.
41. S Yoon, S Hu, NY Kado, A Thiruvengadam, JF Collins, and M Gautam et al. Chemical and toxicological properties of emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies Atmos Environ 83 2014 220 228
42. Dieselnet.com. Emission Standards European Union heavy-duty truck and bus engines, ; 2014 (last accessed June 21, 2014).
43. ER Jayaratne, NK Meyer, ZD Ristovski, L Morawska, and B. Miljevic Critical analysis of high particle number emissions from accelerating compressed natural gas buses Environ Sci Technol 44 2010 3724 3731
44. Å Hallquist, M Jerksjö, H Fallgren, J Westerlund, and Å. Sjödin Particle and gaseous emissions from individual diesel and CNG buses Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 12 2012 27737 27773
45. Ayala A, Kado N, Okamoto R, Gebel M, Rieger P, Kobayashi R, et al. CNG and diesel transit bus emissions in review. In: Diesel engine emissions reduction conference Newport, Rhode Island, ; 2003 (last accessed April 7, 2014).
46. T Thamsiriroj, H Smyth, and JD. Murphy A roadmap for the introduction of gaseous transport fuel: a case study for renewable natural gas in Ireland Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15 2011 4642 4651
47. M. Åhman Biomethane in the transport sector - an appraisal of the forgotten option Energy Policy 38 2010 208 217
48. T Patterson, S Esteves, R Dinsdale, and A. Guwy An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK Energy Policy 39 2011 1806 1816
49. Chandler K, Walkowicz K, Clark N. United Parcel Service (UPS) CNG Truck Fleet: Final Results, NREL/BR-540-31227 Golden, Colorado, ; 2002 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 42.
50. Lyford-Pike EJ. An emission and performance comparison of the natural gas C-gas plus engine in heavy-duty trucks, NREL/SR-540-32863 Golden, Colorado, ; 2003 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 40.
51. x control on heavy-duty diesel truck emissions Environ Sci Technol 43 2009 5928 5933
52. S Hu, JD Herner, W Robertson, R Kobayashi, M-CO Chang, and S-m Huang et al. Emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitro-PAHs from heavy-duty diesel vehicles with DPF and SCR J Air Waste Manage 63 2013 984 996
53. Clark NN, Rapp BL, Gautam M, Wang W, Lyons DW. A long term field emissions study of natural gas fueled refuse haulers in New York City SAE international fall fuels and lubricants meeting, San Francisco, CA, ; 1998 (last accessed April 9, 2014).
54. Chandler K, Norton P, Clark N. Waste management's LNG truck fleet: final results, NREL/BR-540-29073 Golden, Colorado, ; 2001 (last accessed March 25, 2014). p. 50.
55. M.J. Bradley & Associates A demonstration of diesel particulate filter emission control technologies on refuse collection trucks and deployment of natural gas powered street sweepers, Boston, MA, ; 2005 (last accessed April 9, 2014). p. 124.
56. G Karavalakis, M Hajbabaei, TD Durbin, KC Johnson, Z Zheng, and WJ. Miller The effect of natural gas composition on the regulated emissions, gaseous toxic pollutants, and ultrafine particle number emissions from a refuse hauler vehicle Energy 50 2013 280 291
57. Blazek CF, Grimes J, Freeman P, Bailey BK, Colucci C. Fuel composition effects on natural gas vehicle emissions. In: 207th ACS national meeting, San Diego, CA, ; 1994 (last accessed April 9, 2014).
58. Motta RC, Kelly KJ, Warnock WW. Compressed natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas conversions: the national renewable energy laboratory's experience, NREL/SP-425-20514 Golden, Colorado. ; 1996 (last access April 9, 2014). p. 19.
59. Durbin TD, Truex, T. J., Norbeck, J. M. Particulate measurements and emissions characterization of alternative fuel vehicle exhaust, 98-VE-RT12-010-FR Riverside, California, ; 1998 (last accessed April 9, 2014). p. 69.
60. Norbeck JM, Truex TJ, Smith MR, T. D. Inventory of AFVs and AFV comparison: OEM vs. retrofits, 98-VE-RT2W-008-FR Riverside, California, ; 1998 (last accessed April 9, 2014). p. 85.
61. Durbin TD, Norbeck JM, Huai T. Investigation of emission rates of ammonia and other toxic and low-level compounds using FTIR, 01-VE-20903-001-FR riverside, CA, ; 2001 (last accessed April 17, 2014). p. 53.
62. Z Ristovski, L Morawska, GA Ayoko, G Johnson, D Gilbert, and C. Greenaway Emissions from a vehicle fitted to operate on either petrol or compressed natural gas Sci Total Environ 323 2004 179 194
63. S Wright, and A. Pinkelman Natural gas internal combustion engine hybrid passenger vehicle Int J Energy Res 32 2008 612 622
64. G Karavalakis, TD Durbin, M Villela, and JW. Miller Air pollutant emissions of light-duty vehicles operating on various natural gas compositions J Nat Gas Sci Eng 4 2012 8 16
65. KA Subramanian, VC Mathad, VK Vijay, and PMV. Subbarao Comparative evaluation of emission and fuel economy of an automotive spark ignition vehicle fuelled with methane enriched biogas and CNG using chassis dynamometer Appl Energy 105 2013 17 29
66. 2 emissions from a European light-duty CNG-fueled vehicle in the context of Euro 6 emissions regulations Appl Energy 117 2014 134 141
67. AA Martins, RAD Rocha, and JR. Sodré Cold start and full cycle emissions from a flexible fuel vehicle operating with natural gas, ethanol and gasoline J Nat Gas Sci Eng 17 2014 94 98
68. SM Correa, and G. Arbilla Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde associated with the use of natural gas as a fuel for light vehicles Atmos Environ 39 2005 4513 4518
69. C Myung, H Lee, K Choi, Y Lee, and S. Park Effects of gasoline, diesel, LPG, and low-carbon fuels and various certification modes on nanoparticle emission characteristics in light-duty vehicles Int J Automot Technol 10 2009 537 544