High-resolution far-field ghost imaging via sparsity constraint

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Gong, Wenlin ^a   Han, Shensheng ^a  

^a SHANGHAI INSTITUTE OF OPTICS AND FINE MECHANICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925427679     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09280     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Chaudhuri, S. High-resolution imaging (Kluwer Academic Publishers, NorWell, 2001).
2. Kolobov,M. I. Quantum imaging (Springer Science1Business Mediea, LLC, New York, 2007), pp 113-138.
3. Lewis, A., Isaacson, M., Harootunian, A. & Muray, A. Development of a 500A spatial-resolution lightmicroscope: I. light is efficiently transmitted through l/16 diameter apertures. Ultramicroscopy 13, 227-231 (1984).
4. Huang, F. M.,Kao, T. S., Fedotov, V. A., Chen, Y. & Zheludev, N. I. Nanohole array as a lens. Nano Lett. 8, 2469-2472 (2008).
5. Hell, S. W., Schmidt, R. & Egner, A. Diffraction-unlimited three-dimensional optical nanoscopy with opposing lenses. Nature Photon. 3, 381-387 (2009).
6. Yildiz, A. et al. Myosin v walks hand-overhand: Single fluorophore imaging with 1.5 nm localization. Science 300, 2061-2065 (2003).
7. Fernandez-Suarez, M. & Ting, A. Y. Fluorescent probes for high-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 929-943 (2008).
8. Goodman, J. W. Introduction to Fourier Optics (Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1968).
9. Harris, J. L. Diffraction and resolving power. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 931-936 (1964).
10. Papoulis, A. A new algorithm in spectral analysis and band-limited extrapolation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 22, 735-742 (1975).
11. Mallat, S. G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine. Intell. 11, 674-693 (1989).
12. Hunt, B. R. High-resolution of images: algorithms, principles, performance. Int. J. Imaging Syst. and Technol. 6, 297-304 (1995).
13. Cheng, J. & Han, S. Incoherent coincidence imaging and its applicability in X-ray diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093903 (2004).
14. Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M. & Lugiato, L. A. Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entanglement and classical correlation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 093602 (2004).
15. Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J., Boyd, R. W. & Howell, J. C. Quantum and classical coincidence imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033601 (2004).
16. Gong, W., Zhang, P., Shen, X. & Han, S. Ghost "pinhole" imaging in Fraunhofer region. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 071110 (2009).
17. Ferri, F. et al.High-resolution ghost image and ghost diffraction experiments with thermal light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183602 (2005).
18. D'Angelo, M. & Shih, Y. H. Quantum imaging. Laser. Phys. Lett. 2, 567-596 (2005).
19. Gong, W. & Han, S. A method to improve the visibility of ghost images obtained by thermal light. Phys. Lett. A. 374, 1005-1008 (2010).
20. Shapiro, J. H. & Boyd, R.W. The physics of ghost imaging. Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 949-993 (2012).
21. Donoho, D. L. Superresolution via sparsity constraints. Siam. J. Math. Anal. 23, 1309-1331 (1992).
22. Donoho, D. L., Elad, M. & Temlyakov, V. T. Stable recovery of sparse over complete representations in the presence of noise. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 52, 6-18 (2006).
23. Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K. & Tao, T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun. Pur. Appl. Math. 59, 1207-1223 (2006).
24. Candès, E. J. & Wakin, M. B. An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25, 21-30 (2008).
25. Gazit, S., Szameit, A., Eldar, Y. C. & Segev, M. High-resolution and reconstruction of sparse sub-wavelength images. Opt. Express 17, 23920-23946 (2009).
26. Shechtman, Y.,Gazit, S., Szameit, A., Eldar, Y. C. & Segev, M. High-resolution and reconstruction of sparse images carried by incoherent light. Opt. Lett. 35, 1148-1150 (2010).
27. Herman, M. A. & Strohmer, T. High-resolution radar via compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 57, 2275-2284 (2009).
28. Zhao, C. et al.Ghost imaging via sparsity constraints. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 141123 (2012).
29. Graham-Rowe, D. Digital cameras: pixel power. Nature Photon. 1, 211-212 (2007).
30. Katz, O., Bromberg, Y. & Silberberg, Y. Compressive ghost imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 131110 (2009).
31. Du, J., Gong, W. & Han, S. The influence of sparsity property of images on ghost imaging with thermal light. Opt. Lett. 37, 1067-1069 (2012).
32. Figueiredo, M. A., Nowak, T. R. D. & Wright, S. J. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction: Application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. in Sig. Proc. 1, 586-597 (2007).
33. Luo, K. H., Huang, B. Q., Zheng, W. M. & Wu, L. A. Nonlocal Imaging by Conditional Averaging of Random Reference Measurements. Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 074216 (2012).
34. Nieuwenhuizen, R. P. et al.Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 557-562 (2013).