Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 948-952

  Metz, Torri D ^b   Allshouse, Amanda A ^a   Faucett, Allison M ^a   Grobman, William A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BODY MASS; FORECASTING; MATERNAL AGE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BODY MASS INDEX; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; ROC CURVE; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925424807     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000744     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109: 806-12.
2. Costantine MM, Fox K, Byers BD, Mateus J, Ghulmiyyah LM, Blackwell S, et al. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:1029-33.
3. Yokoi A, Ishikawa K, Miyazaki K, Yoshida K, Furuhashi M, Tamakoshi K. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women. Int J Med Sci 2012;9:488-91.
4. Chaillet N, Bujold E, Dubé E, Grobman WA. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean. J Obstet Gy-naecol Can 2013;35:119-24.
5. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Practice Bulletin No. 115. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:450-63.
6. Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E, Stamillo DM, Ratcliffe S, Stevens E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1223-8.
7. Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Ob-stet Gynecol 2006;108:12-20.
8. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-9.
9. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107: 1226-32.