First steps in chat-based negotiating agents

Studies in Computational Intelligence

Volumn 596, Issue , 2015, Pages 89-109

  Zuckerman, Inon ^a   Segal Halevi, Erel ^b   Rosenfeld, Avi ^c   Kraus, Sarit ^b  

^a ARIEL UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925355230     PISSN: 1860949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55525-4_6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Gerding, E.H., Hindriks, K., Ito, T., Jennings, N.R., Jonker, C., Kraus, S., Lin, R., Robu, V., Williams, C.R.: Evaluating practical negotiating agents: results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artif. Intell. 198, 73-103 (2013)
2. Bac, M., Raff, H.: Issue-by-issue negotiations: the role of information and time preference. Games Econ. Behav. 13(1), 125-134 (1996)
3. Busch, L.-A., Horstmann, I.: A comment on issue-by-issue negotiations. Games Econ. Behav. 19(1), 144-148 (1997)
4. Byde, A., Yearworth, M., Chen, K.-Y., Bartolini, C.: Aut ONA: a system for automated multiple 1-1 negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Commerce (CEC), pp. 59-67 (2003)
5. Carvalho, V.R., Cohen, W.W.: Single-pass online learning: performance, voting schemes and online feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD'06, pp. 548-553. ACM, New York (2006)
6. Chen, MK.: Agendas in multi-issue bargaining: when to sweat the small stuff. Technical report, Harvard Department of Economics, Cambridge, November 2002
7. Coen, M.H.: Design principles for intelligent environments. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 547-554 (1998)
8. Cohen, P.R.: The role of natural language in a multimodal interface. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST'92, pp. 143-149. ACM, New York (1992)
9. Dagan, I., Roth, D., Sammons, M., Zanzotto, F.M.: Recognizing textual entailment: models and applications. Synth. Lect. Hum. Lang. Technol. 6(4), 1-220 (2013)
10. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz studies: why and how. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI'93, pp. 193-200. ACM, New York (1993)
11. Gal, Y., Kraus, S., Gelfand, M., Khashan, H., Salmon, E.: An adaptive agent for negotiating with people in different cultures. ACM TIST 3(1), 8 (2011)
12. Hahn, S., Dinarelli, M., Raymond, C., Lefevre, F., Lehnen, P., de Mori, Renato, Moschitti, A., Ney, H., Riccardi, G.: Comparing Stochastic Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding in Multiple Languages. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, vol.19, no.6, pp.1569-1583 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tasl.2010.2093520
13. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 15(2), 221-252 (2007)
14. Jurafsky, D., Martin, James H.: Speech and Language Processing, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall (2008). ISBN: 0131873210
15. Katz, R., Kraus, S.: Efficient agents for cliff edge environments with a large set of decision options. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 697-704 (2006)
16. Kelley, J.F.: An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'83, pp. 193-196. ACM, New York (1983)
17. Kenny, P., Hartholt, A., Gratch, J., Swartout, W., Traum, D., Marsella, S., Piepol, D.: Building interactive virtual humans for training environments. In: Proceedings of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) (2007)
18. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D.: Designing and building a negotiating automated agent. Comput. Intell. 11(1), 132-171 (1995)
19. Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? CACM 53(1), 78-88 (2010)
20. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Artif. Intell. 172(6-7), 823-851 (2008)
21. Madjarov, G., Kocev, D., Gjorgjevikj, D., Dżeroski, S.: An extensive experimental comparison of methods for multi-label learning. Pattern Recogn. 45(9), 3084-3104 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.03.004
22. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course In Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
23. Oshrat, Y., Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Facing the challenge of human-agent negotiations via effective general opponent modeling. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (2009)
24. Pease, A., Colton, S., Smaill, A., Lee, J.: Semantic negotiation: Modelling ambiguity in dialogue. In: Proceedings of Edilog 2002, the 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Edinburgh, UK (2002)
25. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective HumanComputer Interaction, 4th edn. Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston (2004)
26. Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I., Vlahavas, I.: Effective and efficient multilabel classification in domains with large number of labels. In: Proceedings ECML/PKDD 2008 Workshop on Mining Multidimensional Data (MMD'08) (2008)