General hypotheses in invasion ecology

Diversity and Distributions

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1229-1234

  Jeschke, Jonathan M ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925302156     PISSN: 13669516     EISSN: 14724642     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12258     Document Type: Editorial

References (65)

1. Ashton, I.W. & Lerdau, M.T. (2008) Tolerance to herbivory, and not resistance, may explain differential success of invasive, naturalized, and native North American temperate vines. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 169-178.
2. Bacon, S.J., Aebi, A., Calanca, P. & Bacher, S. (2014) Quarantine arthropod invasions in Europe: the role of climate, hosts and propagule pressure. Diversity and Distributions, 20, 84-94.
3. Blackburn, T.M., Lockwood, J.L. & Cassey, P. (2009) Avian invasions: the ecology and evolution of exotic bird species. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
4. Blossey, B. & Nötzold, R. (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 83, 887-889.
5. Cadotte, M.W. (2006) Darwin to Elton: early ecology and the problem of invasive species. Conceptual ecology and invasion biology: reciprocal approaches to nature (ed. by M.W. Cadotte, S.M. McMahon and T. Fukami), pp. 15-33. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
6. Caley, P., Groves, R.H. & Barker, R. (2008) Estimating the invasion success of introduced plants. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 196-203.
7. Catford, J.A., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 22-40.
8. Chun, J.C., van Kleunen, M. & Dawson, W. (2010) The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. Ecology Letters, 13, 937-946.
9. Colautti, R.I., Ricciardi, A., Grigorovich, I. & MacIsaac, H.J. (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters, 7, 721-733.
10. Colautti, R.I., Grigorovich, I.A. & MacIsaac, H.J. (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 8, 1023-1037.
11. Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Murray, London, UK.
12. Davis, M.A. (2011) Researching invasive species 50 years after Elton: a cautionary tale. Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton (ed. by D.M. Richardson), pp. 269-276. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
13. Davis, M.A., Thompson, K. & Grime, J.P. (2001) Charles S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology. Diversity and Distributions, 7, 97-102.
14. Doorduin, L.J. & Vrieling, K. (2011) A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochemistry Reviews, 10, 99-106.
15. Drake, J.A., Mooney, H.A., di Castri, F., Groves, R.H., Kruger, F.J., Rejmánek, M. & Williamson, M. (eds.) (1989) Biological invasions: a global perspective - SCOPE 37. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
16. Ebeling, S.K., Hensen, I. & Auge, H. (2008) The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 225-233.
17. Elton, C.S. (1927) Animal ecology. Sidgwick & Jackson, London, UK.
18. Elton, C.S. (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, UK.
19. Espinosa-García, F.J., Villaseñor, J.L. & Vibrans, H. (2004) The rich generally get richer, but there are exceptions: Correlations between species richness of native plant species and alien weeds in Mexico. Diversity and Distributions, 10, 399-407.
20. Foxcroft, L.C., Rouget, M., Richardson, D.M. & MacFadyen, S. (2004) Reconstructing 50 years of Opuntia stricta invasion in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: environmental determinants and propagule pressure. Diversity and Distributions, 10, 427-437.
21. Fridley, J.D., Stachowicz, J.J., Naeem, S., Sax, D.F., Seabloom, E.W., Smith, M.D., Stohlgren, T.J., Tilman, D. & Von Holle, B. (2007) The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology, 88, 3-17.
22. Grinnell, J. (1917) The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk, 34, 427-433.
23. Gurevitch, J., Fox, G.A., Wardle, G.M., Inderjit & Taub, D. (2011) Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecology Letters, 14, 407-418.
24. Hawkes, C.V. (2007) Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction. American Naturalist, 170, 832-843.
25. Heger, T. & Jeschke, J.M. (2014) The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses. Oikos, 123, 741-750.
26. Heger, T., Pahl, A.T., Botta-Dukat, Z., Gherardi, F., Hoppe, C., Hoste, I., Jax, K., Lindström, L., Boets, P., Haider, S., Kollmann, J., Wittmann, M.J. & Jeschke, J.M. (2013) Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. Ambio, 42, 527-540.
27. Hutchinson, G.E. (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415-427.
28. Ives, A.R. & Carpenter, S.R. (2007) Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science, 317, 58-62.
29. Jeschke, J.M. (2008) Across islands and continents, mammals are more successful invaders than birds. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 913-916.
30. Jeschke, J.M. & Strayer, D.L. (2005) Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 7198-7202.
31. Jeschke, J.M., Gómez Aparicio, L., Haider, S., Heger, T., Lortie, C.J., Pyšek, P. & Strayer, D.L. (2012a) Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota, 14, 1-20.
32. Jeschke, J.M., Gómez Aparicio, L., Haider, S., Heger, T., Lortie, C.J., Pyšek, P. & Strayer, D.L. (2012b) Taxonomic bias and lack of cross-taxonomic studies in invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 349-350.
33. Jeschke, J.M., Keesing, F. & Ostfeld, R.S. (2013) Novel organisms: comparing invasive species, GMOs, and emerging pathogens. Ambio, 42, 541-548.
34. Keane, R.M. & Crawley, M.J. (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 164-170.
35. Keller, R.P., Lodge, D.M. & Finnoff, D.C. (2007) Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 203-207.
36. Kowarik, I. (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. Plant invasions: general aspects and special problems (ed. by P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek and M. Wade), pp. 15-38. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
37. Kowarik, I. & Pyšek, P. (2012) The first steps towards unifying concepts in invasion ecology were made one hundred years ago: revisiting the work of the Swiss botanist Albert Thellung. Diversity and Distributions, 18, 1243-1252.
38. Křivánek, M. & Pyšek, P. (2006) Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Diversity and Distributions, 12, 319-327.
39. Lamarque, L.J., Delzon, S. & Lortie, C.J. (2011) Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits. Biological Invasions, 13, 1969-1989.
40. Levine, J.M. & D'Antonio, C.M. (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos, 87, 15-26.
41. Liu, H. & Stiling, P. (2006) Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis. Biological Invasions, 8, 1535-1545.
42. Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20, 223-228.
43. Lockwood, J.L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. (2009) The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 904-910.
44. Lockwood, J.L., Hoopes, M.F. & Marchetti, M.P. (2013) Invasion ecology, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
45. Lonsdale, W.M. (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology, 80, 1522-1536.
46. Lowry, E., Rollinson, E.J., Laybourn, A.J., Scott, T.E., Aiello-Lammens, M.E., Gray, S.M., Mickley, J. & Gurevitch, J. (2013) Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature. Ecology and Evolution, 3, 182-196.
47. Maron, J.L. & Vilà, M. (2001) When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos, 95, 361-373.
48. McKinney, M.L. (2002) Influence of settlement time, human population, park shape and age, visitation and roads on the number of alien plant species in protected areas in the USA. Diversity and Distributions, 8, 311-318.
49. Moles, A.T., Flores-Moreno, H., Bonser, S.P. et al. (2012) Invasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea. Journal of Ecology, 100, 116-127.
50. Moulton, M.P., Cropper, W.P. Jr & Avery, M.L. (2011) A reassessment of the role of propagule pressure in influencing fates of passerine introductions to New Zealand. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 607-623.
51. Pulliam, H.R. (2000) On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 3, 349-361.
52. Regal, P.J. (1993) The true meaning of 'exotic species' as a model for genetically engineered organisms. Experientia, 49, 225-234.
53. Richardson, D.M. (2004) Plant invasion ecology - dispatches from the front line. Diversity and Distributions, 10, 315-319.
54. Richardson, D.M. & Pyšek, P. (2007) Classics in physical geography revisited: Elton, C.S. 1958: the ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen: London. Progress in Physical Geography, 31, 659-666.
55. Richardson, D.M. & Pyšek, P. (2008) Fifty years of invasion ecology - the legacy of Charles Elton. Diversity and Distributions, 14, 161-168.
56. Richardson, D.M. & Ricciardi, A. (2013) Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field-guide. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 1461-1467.
57. Saul, W.-C., Jeschke, J.M. & Heger, T. (2013) The role of eco-evolutionary experience in invasion success. NeoBiota, 17, 57-74.
58. Sax, D.F., Stachowicz, J.J. & Gaines, S.D. (eds.) (2005) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
59. Sax, D.F., Stachowicz, J.J., Brown, J.H., Bruno, J.F., Dawson, M.N., Gaines, S.D., Grosberg, R.K., Hastings, A., Holt, R.D., Mayfield, M.M., O'Connor, M.I. & Rice, W.R. (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 465-471.
60. Simberloff, D. (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 81-102.
61. Stohlgren, T.J., Barnett, D. & Kartesz, J.T. (2003) The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 11-14.
62. Stohlgren, T.J., Jarnevich, C., Chong, G.W. & Evangelista, P.H. (2006) Scale and plant invasions: a theory of biotic acceptance. Preslia, 78, 405-426.
63. Williamson, M. (1993) Invaders, weeds and the risk from genetically modified organisms. Experientia, 49, 219-224.
64. Williamson, M. (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
65. Williamson, M. & Brown, K.C. (1986) The analysis and modelling of British invasions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 314, 505-522.