Assessment of learning in environments interactive through fuzzy cognitive maps

Soft Computing

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1037-1050

  Barón, Holman Bolívar ^a   Crespo, Rubén González ^b   Pascual Espada, Jordán ^b   Martínez, Oscar Sanjuán ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD INTERNACIONAL DE LA RIOJA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Fuzzy cognitive map; Game based assessment; Intelligent assessment system; Interactive learning environments

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FUZZY RULES; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; STUDENTS;

FUZZY COGNITIVE MAP; GAME-BASED; INTELLIGENT ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STUDENT LEARNING PROCESS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84925290483     PISSN: 14327643     EISSN: 14337479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-014-1313-x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aleven V, Vincent I, Roll B, Mclaren K, Koedinger K (2010) Automated, unobtrusive, action-by-action assessment of self-regulation during learning with an intelligent tutoring system. Educ Psychol 45(4):224–233
2. Alonso S, Pérez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities. Appl Soft Comput 13(1):149–157
3. Ausubel DP (1968) Educational psychology: a cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
4. Baker F, Kim S (2004) Item response theory: parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dedder, New York (p 503)
5. Barab S, Thomas M, Dodge T, Carteaux R, Tuzun H (2005) Making learning fun: quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educ Technol Res Dev 53(1):86–107
6. Byrd D, Case K, Berg W (2011) Planning: fixed-foreperiod event-related potentials during the Tower of London task. Neuropsychologia 49(5):1024–1032
7. Chen C, Chen M (2009) Mobile formative assessment tool based on data mining techniques for supporting web-based learning. Computers Educón 52(1):256–273
8. Cheng C, Tzeng G (2011) Creating the aspired intelligent assessment systems for teaching materials. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12168–12179
9. Choi B, Baek Y (2011) Exploring factors of media characteristic influencing flow in learning through virtual worlds. Proc Computers Educ 57(4):2382–2394
10. Faiola A, Newlon C, Pfaff M, Smyslova O (2012) Correlating the effects of flow and telepresence in virtual worlds: enhancing our understanding of user behavior in game-based learning. Computers Hum Behav 29(3):1113–1121
11. Ferreira-Satler M, Romero F, Menendez-Dominguez V, Zapata A, Prieto M (2012) Fuzzy ontologies-based user profiles applied to enhance e-learning activities. Soft Comput 16(7):1129–1141
12. Freitas S, Oliver M (2006) How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Compters Educ 46(3):249–264
13. Gartner Inc (2009) Gartner Hype cycle for education 2009. In: Proceedings of http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?id=1095713
14. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R (2009) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, London, p 816
15. Havnes A, Smith K, Dysthe O, Ludvigsen K (2012) Formative assessment and feedback: making learning visible. Sutd Educ Eval 38(1):21–27
16. Huang Y, Backman S, Backman K, Moore D (2013) Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Proc Tourism Manage 36:490–501
17. Ibañez M, Morillo D, Delgado C, Pérez D, Santos P, Hernández-Leo D (2010) Assessment in 3D virtual Worlds: QTI in Wonderland. In: Congreso Iberoamericano de Informática Educativa, Santiago de Chile, vol 1, pp 410–417
18. Jarmon L, Traphagan T, Mayrath M, Trivedi A (2009) Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: an interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Proc Computers Educ 53(1):169–182
19. Kaller C, Unterrainer J, Rahm B, Halsband U (2004) The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task. Cognitive Brain Res 20(3):462–472
20. Konar A, Jain L (2005) Cognitive engineering a distributed approach to machine intelligence. Springer, New York, p 353
21. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Mach Stud 24(1):66–75
22. Luo X, And Wei X (2010) Guided game-based learning using fuzzy cognitive maps. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 3(4):344–357
23. Miyake A, Naomi P, Friedman M (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent. Variable Anal Original Res Article Cogn Psychol 41(1):49–100
24. Naim S, Hagras H (2013) A type 2-hesitation fuzzy logic based multi-criteria group decision making system for intelligent shared environments. Soft Comput 13(1):1–15
25. OECD (2011) Measuring improvements in learning outcomes: best practices to assess the value-added of schools. OECD Publishing, p 222
26. Peláez E, Bowles J (1996) Using fuzzy cognitive maps as a system model for failure modes and effects analysis. Inf Sci 88(1–4):177–199
27. Pérez IJ, Mezei J, Wikström R, Carlsson C, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for GDM problems based on a fuzzy ontology. Soft Comput 17(9):1617–1627
28. Reimann P, Kickmeier-Rust M, Albert D (2013) Problem solving learning environments and assessment: a knowledge space theory approach. Computers Educ 64:183–193
29. Rutter M, Maughan B (2002) School effectiveness findings 1979–2002. Proc J School Psychol 40(6):451–475
30. Shadish W (2001) Quasi-experimental designs. Int Encycl Soc Behav Sci 18:12655–12659
31. Stach W, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (2005) Genetic learning of fuzzy cognitive maps. J Fuzzy Sets Syst 153(3):371–401
32. Siu-Lung J, Chi-Wai R, Fang Y (2012) The effects of peer intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on MMOG game-based collaborative learning. Computers Hum Behav 28(5):1663–1669
33. Tugba S (2012) Place presence, social presence, co-presence, and satisfaction in virtual worlds. Computers Educ 18(1):154–161
34. Wang Y (2003) Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Proc Inf Manage 41(1):75–86
35. Wiliam D (2011) What is assessment for learning? Stud Educ Eval 37:3–14