Evaluation of a personalized method for proactive mind wandering reduction

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1181, Issue , 2014, Pages 33-41

  Bixler, Robert ^a   Kopp, Kristopher ^b   D'Mello, Sidney ^a,b  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Engagement; Machine learning; Mind wandering

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

AFFECT; ENGAGEMENT; MIND WANDERING; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; PROACTIVE SYSTEMS; RANDOM CONTROL; SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84925262176     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Graesser, A. C., Olney, A., Haynes, B. C., & Chipman, P. (2005). AutoTutor: a cognitive system that simulates a tutor that facilitates learning through mixed-initiative dialogue. In C. Forsythe, M. L. Bernard, & T. E. Goldsmith (Eds.), Cognitive systems: Human cognitive models in systems design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rosé, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading?. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 3-62.
3. Baker, R., D'Mello, S., Rodrigo, M., & Graesser, A. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (4), 223-241.
4. D'Mello, S., Olney, A., Williams, C., & Hays, P. (2012). Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of human-computer studies, 70(5), 377-398.
5. Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., & Picard, R. (2009). Affectaware tutors: Recognizing and responding to student affect. International Journal of Learning Technology, 4(3/4), 129-163.
6. Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: A review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 67(1), 11.
7. Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Mind Wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in psychology, 4.
8. Kopp, K., Bixler, R., D'Mello, S. K. (In Press). Identifying Learning Conditions that Minimize Mind Wandering by Modeling Individual Attributes. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8474, Springer-Verlag, pp. 94-103
9. Koedinger, K. R., Anderson, J. R., Hadley, W. H., & Mark, M. A. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 8, 30-43.
10. Mitrovic, A. (2012). Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achieved and where we are going. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(1-2), 39-72
11. Millán, E., & Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L. (2002). A Bayesian diagnostic algorithm for student modeling and its evaluation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(2-3), 281-330.
12. Falmagne, J. C., Cosyn, E., Doignon, J. P., & Thiéry, N. (2006). The assessment of knowledge, in theory and in practice. In Formal concept analysis (pp. 61-79). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
13. Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 267-303.
14. D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). AutoTutor and affective AutoTutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 2(4), 23.
15. Aleven, V., Mclaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2), 101-128.
16. Baker, R. S., Mitrović, A., & Mathews, M. (2010). Detecting gaming the system in constraint-based tutors. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (pp. 267-278). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
17. Desmarais, M. C., & d Baker, R. S. (2012). A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(1-2), 9-38.
18. D'Mello, S. K. (2013). A Selective Meta-analysis on the Relative Incidence of Discrete Affective States during Learning with Technology, Journal of Educational Psychology.
19. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: an exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 241-250.
20. Calvo, R. A., & D'Mello, S. K. (2012). Frontiers of affect-aware learning technologies, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(6), 86-89
21. Baker, R. S., Gowda, S. M., Wixon, M., Kalka, J., Wagner, A. Z., Salvi, A., & Rossi, L. (2012, June). Towards Sensor-Free Affect Detection in Cognitive Tutor Algebra. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 126-133).
22. Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 267-303.
23. D'Mello, S., Jackson, T., Craig, S., Morgan, B., Chipman, P., White, H., & Graesser, A. (2008, June). AutoTutor detects and responds to learners affective and cognitive states. In Workshop on Emotional and Cognitive Issues at the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
24. Drummond, J. & Litman, D. (2010). "In the Zone: Towards Detecting Student Zoning Out Using Supervised Machine Learning," Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Part Ii, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6095, V. Aleven, et al., eds., Springer-Verlag, pp. 306-308
25. Bixler, R., & D'Mello, S. K. (in press). Toward Fully Automated Person-Independent Detection of Mind Wandering. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
26. D'Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153-170.
27. D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2011). The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cognition & Emotion, 25(7), 1299-1308.
28. Chin, D. N. (2001). Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 11(1-2), 181-194.
29. Gena, C. (2005). Methods and techniques for the evaluation of user-adaptive systems. The knowledge engineering review, 20(01), 1-37.
30. Mark, M. A., & Greer, J. E. (1993). Evaluation methodologies for intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, 129-129.
31. Mills, C., & D'Mello, S. K. (in prep). How Do Extrinsic Value and Difficulty Impact Engagement: An Experimental Approach.
32. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P. and Witten, I.H. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 11, 1, 10-18.
33. D'Mello, S. K. & Graesser, A. C. (in press). Feeling, Thinking, and Computing with Affect-Aware Learning Technologies. In Calvo, R. A., D'Mello, S. K., Gratch, J., & Kappas, A. (Eds.) Handbook of Affective Computing. Oxford University Press.