Adjusting for Patient Demographics Has Minimal Effects on Rates of Adenoma Detection in a Large, Community-based Setting

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 739-746

  Jensen, Christopher D ^a   Doubeni, Chyke A ^a   Quinn, Virginia P ^a   Levin, Theodore R ^a   Zauber, Ann G ^a   Schottinger, Joanne E ^a   Marks, Amy R ^a   Zhao, Wei K ^a   Lee, Jeffrey K ^a   Ghai, Nirupa R ^a   Schneider, Jennifer L ^a   Fireman, Bruce H ^a   Quesenberry, Charles P ^a   Corley, Douglas A ^a  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon Cancer; Endoscopy; Neoplasm; Polyp

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DEMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIST; ETHNICITY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RACE; COHORT ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; GASTROINTESTINAL NEOPLASMS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADENOMA; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CALIFORNIA; COHORT STUDIES; COLONOSCOPY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL NEOPLASMS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84925202863     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: 15427714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:130-160.
2. Zauber A.G., Winawer S.J., O'Brien M.J., et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. NEngl J Med 2012, 366:687-696.
3. Seeff L.C., Richards T.B., Shapiro J.A., et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:1670-1677.
4. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225-249.
5. Edwards B.K., Ward E., Kohler B.A., et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010, 116:544-573.
6. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1296-1308.
7. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(Suppl):S16-S28.
8. Atkin W., Rogers P., Cardwell C., et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004, 126:1247-1256.
9. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. NEngl J Med 2006, 355:2533-2541.
10. Bressler B., Paszat L.F., Vinden C., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:452-456.
11. Bretthauer M., Skovlund E., Grotmol T., et al. Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003, 38:1268-1274.
12. Chen S.C., Rex D.K. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:856-861.
13. Corley D.A., Jensen C.D., Marks A.R. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? a systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:656-665.
14. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. JNatl Cancer Inst 1990, 82:1769-1772.
15. Hosokawa O., Shirasaki S., Kaizaki Y., et al. Invasive colorectal cancer detected up to 3 years after a colonoscopy negative for cancer. Endoscopy 2003, 35:506-510.
16. Leaper M., Johnston M.J., Barclay M., et al. Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2004, 36:499-503.
17. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:352-359.
18. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:24-28.
19. Sanchez W., Harewood G.C., Petersen B.T. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1941-1945.
20. Schoen R.E., Pinsky P.F., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Results of repeat sigmoidoscopy 3 years after a negative examination. JAMA 2003, 290:41-48.
21. Corley D.A., Jensen C.D., Marks A.R., et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. NEngl J Med 2014, 307:1298-1306.
22. Kaminski M.F., Regula J., Kraszewska E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. NEngl J Med 2010, 362:1795-1803.
23. Corley D.A., Jensen C.D., Marks A.R., et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 11:172-180.
24. Diamond S.J., Enestvedt B.K., Jiang Z., et al. Adenoma detection rate increases with each decade of life after 50 years of age. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:135-140.
25. Shaukat A., Oancea C., Bond J.H., et al. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 7:1335-1340.
26. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992, 82:703-710.
27. Gordon NP. How does the adult Kaiser Permanente membership in Northern California compare with the larger community? 2006. Available at: Accessed December 9, 2014. http://www.dor.kaiser.org/external/uploadedFiles/content/research/mhs/_2011_Revised_Site/Documents_Special_Reports/comparison_kaiser_vs_nonKaiser_adults_kpnc.pdf.
28. CPT 2011 professional edition 2010, American Medical Association Press, Chicago.
29. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. NEngl J Med 2000, 343:162-168.
30. Lieberman D.A., Holub J.L., Moravec M.D., et al. Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patients. JAMA 2008, 300:1417-1422.
31. Baxter N.N., Sutradhar R., Forbes S.S., et al. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:65-72.
32. Cooper G.S., Xu F., Barnholtz Sloan J.S., et al. Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 2012, 118:3044-3052.
33. Rogal S.S., Pinsky P.F., Schoen R.E. Relationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013, 11:73-78.
34. Do A., Weinberg J., Kakkar A., et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc 2013, 77:376-380.
35. Saini S.D., Schoenfeld P., Vijan S. Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? results of a modeling study. Dig Dis Sci 2013, 58:1856-1862.