The milosěvić trial: Lessons for the conduct of complex international criminal proceedings

The Milosevic Trial: Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-306

  Boas, Gideon ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925153818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511619090     Document Type: Book

References (166)

1. Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals(1947), volume 11.
2. Richard May and Marieke Wierda, International Criminal Evidence(2002);
3. Salvatore Zappalà, Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings(2003);
4. Christoph Safferling, Towards an International Criminal Procedure(2001), at 21–30;
5. Patrick L. Robinson, ‘Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2000), vol. 11, no. 3, EJIL, 569;
6. Patrick L. Robinson, ‘Fair but Expeditious Trials’ in Hirad Abtahi and Gideon Boas (eds.), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Richard May(2005), 169;
7. Hafida Lahiouel, ‘The Right of the Accused to an Expeditious Trial’, in Richard May et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence In Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald(2001), 197.
8. James Sloan, ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Fair Trial Rights: A Closer Look’ (1996) 9 LJIL475–501
9. David Harris, ‘The Right to a Fair Trial in Criminal Proceedings’ (1967), vol. 16, no. 2, 352
10. Antonio Cassese, ‘Opinion: the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Human Rights’ (1997) 2 EHRLR, 331–2.
11. Gerhard Hafner, ‘Limits to the Procedural Powers of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, in Karel C. Wellens (ed.), International Law: Theory and Practice(1998), 651–657.
12. Theodor Meron, ‘Editorial Comment: Revival of Customary Humanitarian law’ (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law817
13. Theodor Meron, Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary International Law(1989), 96–7;
14. Antonio Cassese, Human Rights in a Changing World(1990).
15. Peter Malanczuk, Modern Introduction to International Law(7th edn 1997).
16. Suzannah Linton, ‘Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in International Justice’ (2001) 12 Criminal Law Forum185
17. Suzannah Linton, ‘Unravelling the First Three Trials at Indonesia's Ad Hoc Court for Human Rights Violations in East Timor’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law303.
18. Suzannah Linton, ‘Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in International Justice’ (2001) 12 Criminal Law Forum185–198;
19. Janet Lee and Karen Yookung Choi, ‘Introduction to the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, Cambodian Genocide Group, 2 November 2005, http://www.cambodiangenocide.org/khmerrouge_tribunal.htm.
20. Håkan Friman, ‘Procedural Law of Internationalized Criminal Courts’, in Cesare P. R. Romano, André Nollkaemper, and Jann K. Kleffner (eds.), Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia(2004).
21. R. Y. Jennings and A. Watts (eds.), Oppenheim's International Law(9th edn 1992), 7-8;
22. Malcolm N. Shaw, International Law(3rd edn 1995), 98-9;
23. Rodney Dixon, Karim Kahn, and Richard May (eds.), Archbold: International Criminal Courts: Practice, Procedure and Evidence(2002);
24. Geert-Jan A. Knoops, An Introduction to the Law of International Criminal Tribunals: A Comparative Study(2003);
25. Antonio Cassesse, International Criminal Law(2003).
26. David Tolbert and Frederick Swinnen, ‘The Protection of, and Assistance to, Witnesses at the ICTY’, in Hirad Abtahi and Gideon Boas (eds.), Dynamics of Inter-national Criminal Justice, 193;
27. Pascale Chifflet, ‘The Role and Status of the Victim’, in Gideon Boas and William A. Schabas (eds.), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY(2002);
28. Florence Mumba, ‘Ensuring a Fair trial whilst Protecting Victims and Witnesses – Balancing of Interests?’, in Richard May et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure, 363.
29. Christine M. Chinkin, ‘Due Process and Witness Anonymity’ (1997) 91 American Journal of International Law75;
30. Monroe Leigh, ‘The Yugoslav Tribunal: Use of Unnamed Witnesses Against Accused’ (1996) 90 American Journal of International Law235;
31. Natasha A. Affolder, ‘Tadic, the Anonymous Witness and the Sources of International Procedural Law’ (1998), 19 Michigan Journal of International Law445.
32. Kenneth Mann, ‘Hearsay Evidence in War Crimes Trials’, in Yoram Dinstein and Mala Tabory (eds.), War Crimes in International Law(1996), 351.
33. Geoffrey Robertson, Crimes Against Humanity(1999), 203.
34. Antonio Cassese, International Criminal Law(2003), 332–3;
35. Cherif Bassiouni, Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law(1999), 552–4
36. Timothy L. H. McCormack, ‘Selective Reaction to Atrocity: War Crimes and the Development of International Criminal Law’ (1997), 60
37. Timothy L. H. McCormack, ‘From Sun Tzu to the Sixth Committee: The Evolution of an International Criminal Law Regime’ in Timothy L. H. McCormack and Gerry J. Simpson, The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches(1996), 31;
38. Richard H. Minear, Victor's Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial(1973).
39. Gerry J. Simpson, ‘Problems Confronting International Law and Policy on War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity’ (1997), 60 Albany Law Review801, 805–6.
40. B. V. A. Röling and Antonio Cassese, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflection of a Peacemonger(1993).
41. Michael P. Scharf, ‘Symposium: The ICTY at Ten: A Critical Analysis of the Major Rulings of the International Criminal Tribunal Over the Past Decade’ (2003) New Eng. L. Rev. 915, 921–3.
42. M. Hayden, ‘Commentary and Analysis: UN War Crimes Tribunal Delivers a Travesty of Justice’ http://www.d-n-i.net/fcs/international_criminal_tribunal_critique.htm at 21 September 2006.
43. Enrique Carnero Rojo, ‘The Role of Fair Trial Considerations in the Complementarity Regime of the International Criminal Court: From “No Peace without Justice” to No Peace with Victor's Justice’ (2005), 18 Leiden Journal of International Law829, 867–8.
44. Roger Cohen, ‘Tribunal to Cite Bosnian Serb War Chief as War Criminal’, New York Times, 24 April 1995
45. Geo A. Finch, ‘The Peace Conference of Paris 1919: Its Organization and Method of Work’ (1919), 13 American Journal of International Law’, 159.
46. Daryl A. Mundis, ‘From “Common Law” Towards “Civil Law”: The Evolution of the ICTY Rules of Procedure and Evidence’ (2001), 14 Leiden Journal of International Law367;
47. Mirjan Damaška, ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Contemporary Experiments’ (1997), 45 American Journal of Comparative Law839;
48. Françoise Tulkens, ‘Main Comparable Features of the Different European Criminal Justice Systems’ in Mireille Delmas-Marty (ed.), The Criminal Process and Human Rights: Toward a European Consciousness(1995), 5.
49. A. T. H. Smith, in Christine van den Wyngaert (ed.), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community(1993), 85.
50. Patrick L. Robinson, ‘Rough Edges in the Alignment of Legal Systems in the Proceedings at the ICTY’ (2005), 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice1.
51. Paul Tavernier, ‘The Experience of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda’ (1997), 321 International Review of the Red Cross, 605.
52. V. Gowlland-Debbas, ‘Security Council Enforcement Action and Issues of State Responsibility’ (1994), 43 International Criminal Law Quarterly55;
53. Gabriël H. Oosthuizen, ‘Playing Devil's Advocate: the United Nations Security Council is Unbound by Law’ (1999), 12 Leiden Journal of International Law549.
54. ‘The anomalies of the International Criminal Tribunal are legion’ (letter), The Times, 17 June 1999.
55. Michael P. Scharf and Christopher. M. Rassi, ‘Do Former Rogue Leaders Have an International Right to Act as Their Own Lawyers in War Crimes Trials?’ (2004), 20 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution1–11;
56. David Weissbrodt, The Right to a Fair Trial under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Articles 8, 10, 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights(2001), 45;
57. Manfred Nowak, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary(1993), 258.
58. New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Questioning of complainants by unrepresented accused in sexual offences trials, Report No. 101, 2003;
59. D. Klein, Annotation, Right, under Federal Constitution, of accused to represent himself or herself in criminal proceeding – Supreme Court cases(2004) 145
60. Patricia Wald and Jenny Martinez, ‘Provisional Release at the ICTY: A Work in Progress’ in Richard May et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence In Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald(2001), 231.
61. Daryl A. Mundis, ‘Improving the Operation and Functioning of the International Criminal Tribunals’ (2000), 94 American Journal of International Law759.
62. Daryl A. Mundis, ‘The Judicial Effects of the “Completion Strategies” on the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals’ (2005), 99 American Journal of International law, 142–58.
63. Larry D. Johnson, ‘Another Perspective: Closing an International Criminal Tribunal While Maintaining International Human Rights Standards and Excluding Impunity’ (2005), 99 American Journal of International Law159.
64. Goran Sluiter, ‘Symposium: The ICTY at Ten: A Critical Assessment of the Major Rulings of the International Criminal Tribunal Over the Past Decade: International Criminal Proceedings and the Protection of Human Rights’ (2003), 37 New England Law Review935.
65. Maya Steinitz, ‘The Milošević Trial – Live! An Iconical Analysis of International Law's Claim of Legitimate Authority’ (2005), 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice103.
66. Wayne McCormack, ‘Military Detention and the Judiciary: Al Qaeda, the Kkk and Supra-State Law’ (2004) 5 San Diego International Law Journal7;
67. Laura A. Dickinson, ‘Transitional Justice in Afghanistan: The Promise of Mixed Tribunals’ (2002) 31 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy23;
68. Kenneth Anderson, ‘The Military Tribunal Order: What to Do with Bin Laden and Al Qaeda Terrorists? A Qualified Defense of Military Commissions and United States Policy on Detainees at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base (2002) 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy591;
69. Joan Fitzpatrick, ‘Jurisdiction of Military Commissions and the Ambiguous War on Terrorism’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law345;
70. Ruth Wedgwood, ‘Al Qaeda, Terrorism, and Military Commissions’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law328;
71. Daryl A. Mundis, ‘Military Commissions: The Use of Military Commissions to Prosecute Individuals Accused of Terrorist Acts’ (2002) 96 American Society of International Law320.
72. Susan Lamb, ‘The Powers of Arrest of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (1999) 70 British Yearbook of International Law165, 230–1;
73. Michael Scharf, ‘Prosecutor v. Slavko Dokmanović: Irregular Rendition and the ICTY’ (1998) 11 LJIL, 376;
74. Goran Sluiter, ‘Commentary to Prosecutor v. Mrksić et al., Decision on Motion for Release by the Accused Slavko Dokmanović’, in André Klip and Göran Sluiter (eds.), I Annotated Leading Cases of International Tribunals(1999), 151–153.
75. Antonio Cassese, ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and Human Rights’ (1997) 4 European Human Rights Law Review329–336.
76. James Sloan, ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and Fair Trial Rights: A Closer Look’ (1996) 9 Leiden Journal of International Law475;
77. Caroline Buisman, ‘Defence and Fair Trial’, in Roel of Haveman, Olga Kavran, Julian Nicholls, Supranational Criminal Law: A System Sui Generis(2003), 167, 181ff.
78. Louis Henkin, Gerald L. Neuman, Diane Orentlicher, and David W. Leebron, Human Rights(1999), 3.
79. Theodor Meron, ‘Editorial Comment: Revival of Customary Humanitarian law’ (2005) 99 AJIL817;
80. Mohamed Shahabuddeen, ‘Does the Principle of Legality Stand in the Way of Progressive Development of the Law’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice1007;
81. Christopher Greenwood, ‘Command Responsibility and the Hadzˇihazanović Decision’ (2004) 2 Journal of International Criminal Justice598.
82. Michael J. Keegan and Daryl A. Mundis, ‘Legal Requirements for Indictments’ in Richard May et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence In Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald(2001), 123;
83. Judge David Hunt, ‘The Meaning of a “prima facie case” for the Purposes of Confirmation’, in Richard May et al. (eds.), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence In Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald(2001), 137.
84. Salvatore Zappalà, Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings(2003), 36–7.
85. David Tolbert and Frederick Swinnen, ‘The Protection of, and Assistance to, Witnesses at the ICTY’ in Hirad Abtahi and Gideon Boas (eds), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Richard May(2006), 193;
86. Pascale Chifflet, ‘The Role and Status of the Victim’, in Gideon Boas and William A. Schabas (eds), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY(2003), 102–103.
87. Sam Garkawe, ‘The Victim-Related Provisions of the Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Victimology Analysis’ (2001) 8 International Review of Victimology284;
88. Theo van Boven, ‘The Position of the Victim in the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in Herman von Hebel, Johan G. Lammers & Jolien Schukking (eds), Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos(1999) 81–2.
89. Richard May and Marieke Wierda, International Criminal Evidence(2002), 126.
90. Idi Gaparayi, ‘The Milošević Trial at the Half Way Stage: Judgement on the Motion for Acquittal’ (2004) 17 Leiden Journal of International Law737–766.
91. Geoffrey Nice and Philippe Vallières-Roland, ‘Procedural Innovations in War Crimes Trials’ in Hirad Abtahi and Gideon Boas (eds.), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Richard May(2005), 141.
92. Michael Scharf, ‘Self-Representation versus Assignment of Defence Counsel before International Criminal Tribunals’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice31.
93. P. J. Richardson et al. (eds.), Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice, (2003) (‘Archbold’), 1–166.
94. Roger A. Hanson and David B. Rottman, ‘United States: So Many States, So Many Reforms’ (1999) 20 Justice System Journal121, 124–5; 127–9.
95. Holly Bakke and Maureen Solomon, ‘Case Differentiation: An Approach to Individualized Case Management’ (1989) 73 Judicature,17;
96. Robert F. Peckham, ‘A Judicial Response to the Cost of Litigation: Case Management, Two-Stage Discovery Planning and Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (1985) 37 Rutgers Law Review253;
97. Norma Shapiro et al., ‘Pretrial Case Management in the Federal System – “Keeping the Cost of Justice Reasonable” ’ (1984) 14 Golden Gate University Law Review, 611.
98. Doris I. Wilson, ‘Managing Litigation in Canada’ (2002) 5 Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, http://www.cfcj.fcjc.org/issue_5/n5-dwilson.htm
99. Jenny McEwan, ‘Co-operative Justice and the Adversarial Criminal Trial: Lessons from the Wolf Report’ in Sean Doran and John D. Jackson (eds.), The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings(2000), 171.
100. A. T. H. Smith, in Christine van den Wyngaert (ed.), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community(1993).
101. Dinah Shelton, ‘Ensuring Justice with Deliberate Speed: Case Management in the European Court of Human Rights and the United States Courts of Appeals’ (2000), 21 Human Rights Law Journal337–338.
102. National Center for State Courts, ‘Frequently Asked Questions: Differentiated Case Management’, http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/FAQs/DiffCMFAQ.htm 1 October 2006.
103. Michigan State Court Administrative Office, Case flow Management Guide(2004), 20, http://www.courts.michigan.gov/scao/resources/publications/manuals/cfmg.pdf
104. Karen Blöchlinger, ‘Primus Inter Pares: Is the Singapore Judiciary First Among Equals?’ (2000) 9 Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal591
105. Judith Resnik, ‘Managerial Judges’ (1982), 96 Harvard Law Review374.
106. Federal Judicial Center, Manual for Complex Litigation, (4th edition, 2004) http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/mcl4.pdf/$file/mcl4.pdf
107. Roger A. Hanson and David B. Rottman, ‘United States: So Many States, So Many Reforms’ (1999), 20 Justice System Journal121, 124–5; 127–9.
108. J. A. Jolowicz, ‘Adversarial and Inquisitorial Models of Civil Procedure’ (2003), 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 281.
109. Craig M. Bradley, Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study(1999);
110. Mireille Delmas-Marty and J. R. Spencer (eds.), European Criminal Procedures(2002);
111. Nigel G. Foster and Satish Sule, German Legal System and Laws(2002);
112. Christine van den Wyngaert (ed.), Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community(1993).
113. Felicity Nagorcka, Michael Stanton and Michael Wilson, ‘Stranded Between Partisanship and the Truth? A Comparative Analysis of Legal Ethics in the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems of Justice’ (2005), 29 Melbourne University Law Review448–452.
114. Rudolf Schlessinger, ‘Comparative Criminal Procedure: A Plea for Utilizing Foreign Experience’ (1976), 26 Buffalo Law Review363;
115. C. Linke, ‘The Influence of the European Convention of Human Rights on National European Criminal Proceedings’ (1989), 21 De Paul Law Review397;
116. L. J. Fassler, ‘The Italian Penal Procedure Code: An Adversarial System of Criminal Procedure in Continental Europe’ (1991), 29 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law251;
117. Christoph Safferling, Towards an International Criminal Procedure(2001).
118. Robert S. Thompson, ‘Decision, Disciplined Inferences and the Adversary Process’ (1991), 13 Cardozo Law Review725–742.
119. David Pimentel, ‘Technology in a War Crimes Tribunal: Recent Experience at the ICTY’ (2004), 12 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 715, 717–21;
120. Henry H. Perritt, Jr., ‘Cyberspace and State Sovereignty’ (1997), 3 Journal of International Legal Studies155.
121. Family Court Steering Committee, A Model Family Court for Florida: Recommendations of the Florida Supreme Court's Family Court Steering Committee(June, 2000), http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/pub_info/documents/ModelFamilyCout2000.pdf
122. Court Delay, “Local Legal Culture”, and Caseflow Management Since the Late 1970s’ (1997), 19 Justice Systems Journal, 145;
123. Richard L. Marcus, ‘Reining in the American Litigator: The New Role for American Judges’ (2003), 27 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review3–27.
124. Douglas G. Smith, ‘Structural and Functional Aspects of the Jury: Comparative Analysis and Proposals for Reform’ (1997), 48 Alabama Law Review441–455.
125. Richard May and Marieke Wierda, International Criminal Evidence(2002), 18.
126. Geert-Jan Alexander Knoops, An Introduction to the Law of International Criminal Tribunals: A Comparative Study(2003);
127. Daryl A. Mundis, ‘Improving the Operation and Functioning of the International Criminal Tribunals’ (2000), 94 American Journal of International Law759;
128. Gideon Boas, ‘A Code of Evidence and Procedure for International Criminal Law? The Rules of the ICTY’ in Gideon Boas and William A. Schabas (eds.), International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY(2002);
129. Gideon Boas, ‘Creating Laws of Evidence for International Criminal Law: The ICTY and the Principle of Flexibility’ (2001), 12 Criminal Law Forum41;
130. Gideon Boas, ‘Developments in the Law of Procedure and Evidence at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Court’ (2001), 12 Criminal Law Forum167.
131. Claus Kress, ‘The Procedural Law of the International Criminal Court in Outline: Anatomy of a Unique Compromise’ (2003), 1 Journal of International Criminal Justice603, 603–5.
132. Gideon Boas, ‘Comparing the ICTY and the ICC: Some Procedural and Substantive Issues’ (2000) 47 Netherlands International Law Review267.
133. Rodney Dixon, Karim A. A. Khan, and Richard May (eds.), Archbold International Criminal Courts: Practice Procedure and Evidence(2003), 186–90.
134. Gregory P. Lombardi, ‘The ICTY at Ten: A Critical Assessment of The Major Rulings of The International Criminal Tribunal Over the Past Decade’ (2003), 37 New England Law Review887;
135. Máximo Langer, ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Book in Criminal Procedure’ (2004), 45 Harvard International Law Journal1;
136. James Cockayne, ‘The Fraying Shoestring: Rethinking Hybrid War Crimes Tribunals’ (2005), 28 Fordham International Law Journal616;
137. Michael A. Newton, ‘The Iraqi Special Tribunal: A Human Rights Perspective’ (2005), 38 Cornell International Law Journal863;
138. Larry D. Johnson, ‘Closing an International Criminal Tribunal while Maintaining International Human Rights Standards and Excluding Impunity’ (2005), 99 American Journal of International Law158.
139. Michael J. Frank, ‘Justice for Iraq, Justice for All’ (2004), 57 Oklahoma Law Review303;
140. Michael P. Scharf and Curtis F. J. Doebbler, ‘Will Saddam Hussein Get a Fair Trial?’ (2005), 37 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law21
141. Human Rights Watch, ‘The Former Iraqi Government on Trial: A Human Rights Watch Briefing paper’, 16 October 2005.
142. Michael P. Scharf and Christopher M. Rassi, ‘Do Former Rogue Leaders Have an International Right to Act as Their Own Lawyers in War Crimes Trials?’ (2004) 20 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution1–14.
143. Salvatore Zappalà, Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings(2003), 64.
144. Michael J. Frank, ‘Justice for Iraq, Justice for All’ (2004) 57 Oklahoma Law Review303;
145. Michael P. Scharf and Curtis F.J. Doebbler, ‘Will Saddam Hussein Get a Fair Trial?’ (2005) 37 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law21
146. Human Rights Watch, ‘The Former Iraqi Government on Trial: A Human Rights Watch Briefing paper’, 16 October 2005, http://hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/iraq1005/
147. Eric Stover, Hanny Megally and Hania Mufti, ‘Bremer's ‘Gordian Knot’: Transitional Justice and the US Occupation of Iraq’ (2005) 27 Human Rights Quarterly830, 838–43.
148. Göran Sluiter, ‘Fairness and the Interests of Justice: Illustrative Concepts in the Milošević Case’ (2005) 3 Journal of International Criminal Justice9–13.
149. Michael Scharf, ‘Self-Representation versus Assignment of Defence Counsel before International Criminal Tribunals’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice31
150. P. J. Richardson et al. (eds.), Archbold: Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice(2003) (‘Archbold’), 4–41, 4–42.
151. Lance Bartholomeusz, ‘The Amicus Curiae before the International Courts and Tribunals’, (2005) 5 Non–State Actors and International Law211.
152. Rodney Dixon, Aga Khan, and Richard May (eds.), Archbold International Criminal Courts: Practice, Procedure and Evidence(2003), 379–84;
153. Ascensio Hervé, ‘L’amicus curiae devant les juridictions internationals’, (2001) 105 Revue générale de droit international public, 4;
154. Jarinde Temminck Tuinstra, ‘Assisting the Accused to Represent Himself: Appointment of Amici Curiae as the Most Appropriate option’ (2006) 4 Journal of International Criminal Justice47.
155. William A. Schabas, ‘Article 67’, in Otto Trifterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court(1999), 857.
156. Michael Bohlander, ‘The Defence’, in Gideon Boas and William A. Schabas, International Criminal Law Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY(2003), 35;
157. Michaels Greaves, ‘The Right to Counsel Before the ICTY and the ICTR for Indigent Suspects: An Unfettered Right?’, in Richard May et al. (eds), Essays on ICTY Procedure and Evidence in Honour of Gabrielle Kirk McDonald(2001), 177.
158. Richard May and Marieke Wierda, International Criminal Evidence(2002), 271.
159. May and Wierda, International Criminal Evidence(2002), 271.
160. Megan Fairlie, ‘The Marriage Between Common and Continental Law at the ICTY and its Progeny, Due Process Deficit’ (2004) 4 International Criminal Law Review243;
161. Salvatore Zappalà, Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings(2003);
162. Patrick L. Robinson, ‘Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law569;
163. Patrick L. Robinson, ‘Fair but Expeditious Trials’ in Hirad Abtahi and Gideon Boas (eds.), The Dynamics of International Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Richard May(2005), 169;
164. Mirjan Damaška, ‘The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Contemporary Experiments’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law839;
165. Françoise Tulkens, ‘Main Comparable Features of the Different European Criminal Justice Systems’ in Mireille Delmas-Marty (ed.), The Criminal Process and Human Rights: Toward a European Consciousness(1995), 5.
166. Patrick L. Robinson, ‘Rough Edges in the Alignment of Legal Systems in the Proceedings at the ICTY’ (2005) 3 JICJ1–4.