The role of mnemonic processes in pure-target and pure-foil recognition memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 509-516

  Koop, Gregory J ^a   Criss, Amy H ^a   Malmberg, Kenneth J ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Criterion shifts; Feedback; Output interference; Test composition

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SIZE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925069613     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0703-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Annis, J., Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2013). Sources of interference in recognition testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1365–1376.
2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.
3. Cox, J. C., & Dobbins, I. G. (2011). The striking similarities between standard, distractor-free, and target-free recognition. Memory & Cognition, 39, 925–940.
4. Criss, A. H. (2009). The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 297–319.
5. Criss, A. H., Kiliç, A., Malmberg, K. J., & Fontaine, J. (2014). Learning during study and test: A joint evaluation of list length effects and output interference. Manuscript in preparation.
6. Criss, A. H., & Koop, G. J. (in press). Differentiation in episodic memory. In J. Raaijmakers, A. H. Criss, R. Goldstone, R. Nosofsky, & M. Steyvers (Eds.), Cognitive modeling in perception and memory: A Festschrift for Richard M. Shiffrin. Psychology Press.
7. Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2011). Output interference in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 316–326.
8. Glanzer, M., Hilford, A., & Maloney, L. T. (2009). Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(3), 431–455. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.431
9. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger.
10. Han, S., & Dobbins, I. G. (2008). Examining recognition criterion rigidity during testing using a biased-feedback technique: Evidence for adaptive criterion learning. Memory and Cognition, 36, 703–715.
11. Healy, A. F., & Kubovy, M. (1978). The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cutoff location in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 544–553.
12. Hicks, J. L., & Starns, J. J. (2014). Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0397-y
13. Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2010). Can corrective feedback improve recognition memory? Memory & Cognition, 38, 389–406.
14. Kiliç, A. (2013). Output interference and strength based mirror effect in recognition memory (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from SURFACE Psychology-Dissertations.
15. Koop, G. J., & Criss, A. H. (2013). The response dynamics of recognition memory: Sensitivity and bias. Toronto, ONT: Poster session presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
16. Malmberg, K. J., & Annis, J. (2012). On the relationship between memory and perception: Sequential dependencies in recognition memory testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 233–259.
17. Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., Gangwani, T. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2012). Overcoming the negative consequences of interference from recognition memory testing. Psychological Science, 23, 115–119.
18. Mickes, L., Hwe, V., Wais, P. E., & Wixted, J. T. (2011). Strong memories are hard to scale. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 239–257.
19. Murdock, B. B., Jr., & Anderson, R. E. (1975). Encoding, storage, and retrieval of item information. In Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 145–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C. F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518–535.
21. Rhodes, M. G., & Jacoby, L. L. (2007). On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: Effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 305–320.
22. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Hicks, J. L., & Hautus, M. J. (2006). Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1598–1614.
23. Starns, J. J., White, C. N., & Ratcliff, R. R. (2010). A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 18–34.
24. Starns, J. J., White, C. N., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: The evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1189–1199.
25. Treisman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68–111.
26. Turner, B. M., Van Zandt, T., & Brown, S. (2011). A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection. Psychological Review, 118, 583–613.
27. Wallace, W. P. (1982). Distractor-free recognition tests of memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 95, 421–440.