On the relationship between memory and perception: Sequential dependencies in recognition memory testing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 233-259

  Malmberg, Kenneth J ^a   Annis, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Absolute identification; Assimilation; Judgments of frequency; Recognition; Sequential dependencies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84866243786     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025277     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
2. Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Learning memory and thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 243-293). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
3. Banks, W. P. (1970). Signal detection theory and human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 81-99. doi:10.1037/h0029531
4. Bernbach, H. A. (1967). Decision process in memory. Psychological Review, 74, 462-480. doi:10.1037/h0025132
5. Brown, S. D., Marley, A. A. J., Donkin, C., & Heathcote, A. (2008). An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification. Psychological Review, 115, 396-425. doi:10.1037/0033295X.115.2.396
6. Collier, G. (1954a). Intertrial association at the visual threshold as a function of intertribal Interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 330-334. doi:10.1037/h0055761
7. Collier, G. (1954b). Probability of response and intertrial association as functions of monocular and binocular stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 75-83. doi:10.1037/h0058899
8. Collier, G., & Verplanck, W. S. (1958). Nonindependence of successive responses at threshold as a function of interpolated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 429-437. doi:10.1037/h0047574
9. Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2011). Output Interference in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 316-326.
10. Darwin, C., Turvey, M., & Crowder, R. (1972). An auditory analogue of the Sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 255-267. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90007-2
11. Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J., & Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1-21. doi:10.3758/BF03193807
12. Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica, 30, 412-431. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(69)90065-1
13. Düzel, E., & Heinze, H. J. (2002). The effect of item sequence on brain activity during recognition memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 115-127. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00102-1
14. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (No. AFCRC-TN-58-51). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Hearing and Communications Laboratory.
15. Estes, W. K. (1992). Mental psychophysics of categorization and decision. In H. Geissler, S. W. Link, & J. T. Townsend (Eds.), Cognition, information processing, and psychophysics: Basic issues (pp. 123-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.
17. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
18. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 1-18. doi:10.1006/ jmla.1994.1001
19. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1995). When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning. Memory & Cognition, 23, 213-226. doi:10.3758/BF03197223
20. Hintzman, D. L., Curran, T., & Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 667-680. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.667
21. Holland, M. K., & Lockhead, G. R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 409-414. doi: 10.3758/BF03205747
22. Howarth, C. I., & Bulmer, M. G. (1956). Non-random sequences in visual threshold experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 163-171. doi:10.1080/17470215608416816
23. Jones, M., Love, B. C., & Maddox, W. T. (2006). Recency effects as a window to generalization: Separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 316-332. doi:10.1037/02787393.32.3.316
24. Jones, M., & Sieck, W. R. (2003). Learning myopia: An adaptive recency effect in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 626-640. doi:10.1037/02787393.29.4.626
25. Kintsch, W. (1967). Memory and decision aspects of recognition learning. Psychological Review, 74, 496-504. doi:10.1037/h0025127
26. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. (1983). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
27. Lacouture, Y., & Marley, A. A. J. (1995). A mapping model of bow effects in absolute identification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 383-395. doi:10.1006/jmps.1995.1036
28. Lockhart, R. S., & Murdock, B. B. (1970). Memory and theory of signal detection. Psychological Review, 74, 100-109.
29. Lockhead, G. R. (1984). Sequential predictors of choice in psychophysical tasks. In S. Kornblum, & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory states and processes (pp. 27-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Lockhead, G. R. (2004). Absolute judgments are relative: A reinterpretation of some psychophysical ideas. Review of General Psychology, 8, 265-272. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.265
31. Luce, R. D., Nosofsky, R. M., Green, D. M., & Smith, A. F. (1982). The bow and sequential effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 397-408. doi:10.3758/BF03202769
32. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
33. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Maddox, W. T., & Estes, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulusfrequency effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 539-559.
35. Malmberg, K. J. (2008). Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 335-384. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.02.004
36. Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., Gangwani, T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2011). Overcoming the negative consequences of interference that results from recognition memory testing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
37. Malmberg, K. J., Holden, J. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 319-331. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.319
38. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
39. Matthews, W. J., & Stewart, N. (2009). The effect of inter-stimulus interval on sequential effects in absolute identification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2014-2029. doi:10.1080/17470210802649285
40. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for information processing. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
41. Mori, S., & Ward, L. M. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1065-1079. doi:10.3758/ BF03205465
42. Murdock, B. B. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16-31. doi:10.1037/h0042382
43. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-61. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39
44. Petrov, A. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2005). The dynamics of scaling: A memory-based anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. Psychological Review, 112, 383-416. doi:10.1037/0033295X.112.2.383
45. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition, Evidence for propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403-417. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90238-4
46. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385-408. doi:10.1037/0033295X.95.3.385
47. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
48. Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2009). Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116, 59-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014086
49. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
50. Schwartz, G., Howard, M. W., Jing, B., & Kahana, M. J. (2005). Shadows of the past: Temporal retrieval effects in recognition memory, Psychological Science, 16, 898-904. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01634.x
51. Shiffrin, R. M., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1994). Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limitations. Psychological Review, 101, 357-361. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.357
52. Siegel, W. (1972). Memory effects in the method of absolute judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 121-131. doi:10.1037/ h0032753
53. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1-29.
54. Stewart, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2004). Sequence effects in categorizing tones varying in frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 416-430. doi:10.1037/02787393.30.2.416
55. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2002). Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 3-11. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.28.1.3
56. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112, 881-911. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.112.4.881
57. Tanner, T. A., Haller, R. W., & Atkinson, R. C. (1967). Signal recognition as influenced by presentation schedules. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2, 349-358. doi:10.3758/BF03210070
58. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). "A law of comparative judgment." Psychological Review 34, 273-286. doi:10.1037/h0070288
59. Treisman, M. (1985). The magical number seven and some other features of category scaling: Properties for a model of absolute judgment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 175-230. doi:10.1016/00222496(85)90015-X
60. Treisman, M., & Williams, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.68
61. Tulving, E., & Arbuckle, T. (1966). Input and output interference in short-term associative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(1), 145-150. doi:10.1037/h0023344
62. Verplanck, W. S., Collier, G. H., & Cotton, J. W. (1952). Nonindependence of successive responses in measurements of the visual threshold. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 273-282. doi:10.1037/ h0054948
63. Ward, L. M., & Lockhead, G. R. (1971). Response system processes in absolute judgment. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 9, 73-78. doi:10.3758/BF03213031