Corrigendum: The role of Facebook users’ selfsystems in generating social relationships and social capital effects[New Media & Society(2015), 17, 501-519, 10.1177/1461444813506977];The role of Facebook users’ self-systems in generating social relationships and social capital effects

New Media and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 501-519

  Jin, Chang Hyun ^a  

^a Kyonggi University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Facebook; self system; social capital; social network sites; social relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925018650     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444815585443     Document Type: Erratum

References (59)

1. Agarwal R,Karahanna E.Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage.MIS Quarterly. 2000;24:665-694
2. Alberti RE,Emmons MLYour Perfect Right: A Guide to Assertive Behavior. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact Publisher; 1978:
3. Amichai-Hamburger Y,Vinitzky G.Social network use and personality.Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26:1289-1295
4. Bagley C,Bolitho F,Bertrand L.Norms and construct validity of the rosenberg self-esteem scale in Canadian high school populations: implications for counseling.Canadian Journal of counseling. 1997;31 (1): 82-92
5. Bagozzi RP,Yi Y.On the evaluation of structural equation models.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1988;16 (1): 74-94
6. Bandura A.Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Reports. 1997;84:191-215
7. Battle J.Relationship between self-esteem and depression.Psychological Reports. 1978;42:745-746
8. Beaudoin CE,Thorson E.Social capital in rural and urban communities: testing differences in media effects and models.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2004;81:378-399
9. Bolton RHow to Assert Yourself, Listen to Others and Resolve Conflicts. Woodinville, WA: PL Publishers; 1983:
10. boyd DM,Ellison NB.Social network sites: definition history and scholarship.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;13 (1): 210-230
11. Coyle C,Vaughn H.Social networking: communication revolution or evolution?.Bell Labs Technical Journal. 2008;13 (2): 13-18
12. Davis FD.Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly. 1989;13:319-340
13. Derlega VL,Metts S,Petronio S, et alSelf-Disclosure. London: SAGE; 1993:
14. Donath J,boyd D.Public displays of connection.BT Technology Journal. 2004;22 (4): 71-82
15. DuBois D,Tevendale H,Burk-Braxton C, et al.Self-system influences during early adolescence: investigation of an integrative model.Journal of Early Adolescence. 2000;20 (1): 12-43
16. Dunlap JC,Lowenthal PR.Tweeting the night away: using Twitter to enhance social presence.Journal of Information Systems Education. 2009;20 (2): 129-136
17. Durden ED,Hill TD,Angel RJ.Social demands, social supports and psychological distress among low-income women.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2007;24:343-361
18. Ellison N,Heino R,Gibbs J.Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2006;11 (2): 415-441
19. Ellison N,Steinfield C,Lampe C.The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007;12 (4): 1143-1168
20. Epstein S.The stability of behavior: implications for psychological research.American Psychologist. 1980;35 (9): 790-806
21. Fornell C,Larker D.Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors.Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18:
22. Garrison DR,Anderson T,Archer W.critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education.Internet and Higher Education. 1999;2 (1): 87-105
23. Gefen D,Straub DW.Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-products and e-services.Omega. 2004;32 (6): 407-424
24. Granovetter MS.The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited.Sociological Theory. 1982;1:201-233
25. Hair JF,Anderson RE,Tatham RL, et alMultivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998:
26. Harter SThe Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 1999:
27. Higgins ETSelf Processes and Development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development. Gunnar MRSroufe LA, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp; 1991:125-166.
28. Hill T,Smith DN,Mann MF.Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1987;72 (2): 307-314
29. Kaplan AA,Haelein M.Users of the world unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media.Business Horizons. 2010;53 (2): 59-68
30. Kleine RE,Kleine SS,Kernan JB.Mundane consumption and the self: a social-identity perspective.Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1993;2 (3): 209-235
31. Lee G,Lee J,Kwon S.Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being: a study in South Korea.Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 2011;14 (3): 151-155
32. Lee KM.Presence, explicated.Communication Theory. 2004;14 (1): 27-50
33. Lin N.Building a network theory of social capital.Connections. 1999;22 (1): 28-51
34. Lin NSocial Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001:
35. McLeod JM,Scheufele DA,Moy P.Community communication and participation: the role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation.Political Communication. 1999;16:315-336
36. Middleton CA,Leith J.Intensity of Internet use in Canada: exploring Canadians’ engagement with the Internet.Paper presented at the Statistics Canada socio-economic conference; 2007Ottawa, ON, Canada; 2007.
37. Nunnally JCPsychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978:
38. Pempek TA,Yermolayeva YA,Calvert SL.College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2009;30:227-238
39. Pfeil U,Arjan R,Zaphiris P.Age differences in online social networking – a study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace.Computers in Human Behavior. 2009;25:643-654
40. Putnam RD.The prosperous community: social capital and public life.The American Prospect. 1993;13:35-42
41. Putnam RDBowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000:
42. Shah DV,Kwak N,Holbert RL.Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital.Political Communication. 2001;18:141-162
43. Short JA,Williams E,Christie BThe Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley; 1976:
44. Sprecher S,Hendrick SS.Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2004;23:857-877
45. StaplesDSHullandJSHigginsCA (1998) A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3(4). Available at: http://wwwascuscorg/jcmc/vol3/issue4/stapleshtml
46. Steinfield C,Dimicco J,Ellison NB, et al.Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization.ACM; 2009New York; 2009. 25.
47. Steinfield C,Ellison NB,Lampe C.Online social network use self-esteem and social capital: a longitudinal analysis.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2008;29 (6): 434-445
48. StevensV (2008) Trial by Twitter: the rise and slide of the year’s most viral microblogging platform. TESL-EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language12(1). Available at: http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej45/int.html (accessed 24 September 2013).
49. Straub E.Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning.Review of Educational Research. 2009;79 (2): 625-649
50. Sujan H,Weitz BA,Kumar N.Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling.Journal of Marketing. 1994;58:39-52
51. Trusov M,Randolph EB,Pauwels K.Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an Internet social networking site.Journal of Marketing. 2009;73:90-102
52. Valenzuela S,Park N,Kee KF.Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction trust and participation.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009;14 (4): 875-901
53. Wellman B,Haase AQ,Witte J, et al.Does the Internet increase, decrease or supplement social capital? Social networks participation and community commitment.American Behavioral Scientist. 2001;45 (3): 436-456
54. Williams E.Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: a review.Psychological Bulletin. 1977;84 (5): 963-976
55. Wolpe JPsychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1958:
56. Wolpe J,Lazarus AABehavior Therapy Techniques. New York: Pergamon Press; 1966:
57. Young L,Bagley CSelf-Concept Achievement and Multicultural Education. Verma GBagley C, ed. London: Macmillan, pp; 1982:41-59.
58. Zinkhan GM,Joachimsthaler EA,Kinnear TC.Individual differences and marketing decision support system usage and satisfaction.Journal of Marketing Research. 1987;24 (2): 208-214
59. Zmud RW.Individual differences and MIS success: a review of the empirical literature.Management Science. 1979;25 (10): 966-979