Multiregional input-output model for china's farm land and water use

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 403-414

  Guo, Shan ^a   Shen, Geoffrey Qiping ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; COMMERCE; COMPLEX NETWORKS; FLOW OF WATER; HYDRAULICS; WATER SUPPLY;

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIONS; EASTERN AREA; INPUT OUTPUT MODEL; POLICY MAKERS; RESOURCE ENDOWMENTS; RESOURCE UTILIZATIONS; WATER CONSUMPTION; WESTERN AREA;

WATER RESOURCES;

WATER;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; POLICY MAKING; REGIONAL PATTERN; RESOURCE USE; TRADE-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONS; WATER FLOW; WATER RESOURCE; WATER USE;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; ARTICLE; CHINA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLUID INTAKE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL AREA; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIREGIONAL INPUT OUTPUT MODEL; POLICY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WATER FLOW; WATER SUPPLY; AGRICULTURE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CHINA;

AGRICULTURE; CHINA; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 84924970130     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es503637f     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Hanjra, M. A.; Qureshi, M. E. Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 2010, 35 (5), 365-377.
2. Lambin, E. F.; Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108 (9), 3465-3472.
3. Rulli, M. C.; Saviori, A.; D'Odorico, P. Global land and water grabbing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110 (3), 892-897.
4. Yang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, J. Land and water requirements of biofuel and implications for food supply and the environment in China. Energy Policy 2009, 37 (5), 1876-1885.
5. Hubacek, K.; Sun, L. A scenario analysis of China's land use and land cover change: incorporating biophysical information into input-output modeling. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 2001, 12 (4), 367-397.
6. Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Shao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Y. Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: Present, trend and future. Land Use Policy 2012, 29 (4), 737-749.
7. Zhang, C.; Anadon, L. D. A multi-regional input-output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 100, 159-172.
8. Zhang, Z. Y.; Yang, H.; Shi, M. J.; Zehnder, A. J. B.; Abbaspour, K. C. Analyses of impacts of China's international trade on its water resources and uses. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15 (9), 2871-2880.
9. Zhao, X.; Chen, B.; Yang, Z. F. National water footprint in an input-output framework-A case study of China 2002. Ecol. Modell. 2009, 220 (2), 245-253.
10. Hoekstra, A. Y.; Mekonnen, M. M. The water footprint of humanity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109 (9), 3232-3237.
11. Biewald, A.; Rolinski, S.; Lotze-Campen, H.; Schmitz, C.; Dietrich, J. P. Valuing the impact of trade on local blue water. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 101, 43-53.
12. Dong, H.; Geng, Y.; Fujita, T.; Fujii, M.; Hao, D.; Yu, X. Uncovering regional disparity of China's water footprint and interprovincial virtual water flows. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 500-501, 120-130.
13. Hoekstra, A. Y.; Hung, P. Q. Globalisation of water resources: international virtual water flows in relation to crop trade. Global Environ. Change 2005, 15 (1), 45-56.
14. Rost, S.; Gerten, D.; Bondeau, A.; Lucht, W.; Rohwer, J.; Schaphoff, S. Agricultural green and blue water consumption and its influence on the global water system. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44 (9), No. W09405.
15. Costello, C.; Griffin, W. M.; Matthews, H. S.; Weber, C. L. Inventory development and input-output model of U.S. land use: Relating land in production to consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (11), 4937-4943.
16. Hertwich, E. G.; Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (16), 6414-6420.
17. Kanemoto, K.; Lenzen, M.; Peters, G. P.; Moran, D. D.; Geschke, A. Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption, and international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (1), 172-179.
18. Larsen, H. N.; Hertwich, E. G. The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12 (7), 791-798.
19. Peters, G. P.; Minx, J. C.; Weber, C. L.; Edenhofer, O. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108 (21), 8903-8908.
20. Skelton, A.; Guan, D.; Peters, G. P.; Crawford-Brown, D. Mapping flows of embodied emissions in the global production system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (24), 10516-10523.
21. Wiedmann, T. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69 (2), 211-222.
22. Liang, Q. M.; Fan, Y.; Wei, Y.-M. Multi-regional input-output model for regional energy requirements and CO2 emissions in China. Energy Policy 2007, 35 (3), 1685-1700.
23. Su, B.; Ang, B. W. Input-output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: A multi-region model for China. Appl. Energy 2014, 114, 377-384.
24. Zhang, B.; Chen, Z. M.; Xia, X. H.; Xu, X. Y.; Chen, Y. B. The impact of domestic trade on China's regional energy uses: A multiregional input-output modeling. Energy Policy 2013, 63, 1169-1181.
25. Zhou, X.; Imura, H. How does consumer behavior influence regional ecological footprints? An empirical analysis for Chinese regions based on the multi-region input-output model. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 71, 171-179.
26. Lenzen, M. Understanding virtual water flows: A multiregion input-output case study of Victoria. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45 (9), No. W09416.
27. Apergis, N.; Payne, J. E. The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: Evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States. Energy Policy 2010, 38 (1), 650-655.
28. Casillas, C. E.; Kammen, D. M. The energy-poverty-climate nexus. Renewable Energy 2010, 300, 200.
29. Chen, B.; Chen, S. Urban metabolism and nexus. Ecol. Informatics 2014, DOI: org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.09.010.
30. Villarroel Walker, R.; Beck, M.; Hall, J.; Dawson, R.; Heidrich, O. The energy-water-food nexus: Strategic analysis of technologies for transforming the urban metabolism. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 141, 104-115.
31. Galli, A.; Wiedmann, T.; Ercin, E.; Knoblauch, D.; Ewing, B.; Giljum, S. Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "Footprint Family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 16, 100-112.
32. Galli, A.; Weinzettel, J.; Cranston, G.; Ercin, E. A Footprint Family extended MRIO model to support Europe's transition to a One Planet Economy. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 461-462, 813-818.
33. Fang, K.; Heijungs, R.; de Snoo, G. R. Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: Overview of a footprint family. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36, 508-518.
34. Ewing, B. R.; Hawkins, T. R.; Wiedmann, T. O.; Galli, A.; Ertug Ercin, A.; Weinzettel, J.; Steen-Olsen, K. Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input-output framework. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 1-8.
35. Steen-Olsen, K.; Weinzettel, J.; Cranston, G.; Ercin, A. E.; Hertwich, E. G. Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: Consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (20), 10883-10891.
36. MLR (Ministry of Land Resources of China). China Land and Resources Statistical Yearbook; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, 2008; in Chinese.
37. Gibbs, H. K.; Ruesch, A. S.; Achard, F.; Clayton, M. K.; Holmgren, P.; Ramankutty, N.; Foley, J. A. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107 (38), 16732-16737.
38. Qiang, W.; Liu, A.; Cheng, S.; Kastner, T.; Xie, G. Agricultural trade and virtual land use: The case of China's crop trade. Land Use Policy 2013, 33, 141-150.
39. Mekonnen, M. M.; Hoekstra, A. Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15 (5), 1577-1600.
40. NBS, MEPC (Bureau of Statistics; Ministry of Environmental Protection of China). China Environmental Statistical Yearbook National; China Statistics Press: Beijing, 2008; in Chinese.
41. Yang, D. Yearbook of China Water Resources 2008; China Water Power Press: Beijing, 2008; in Chinese.
42. MWRC (Ministry of Water Resources of China). China's Water Resources Bulletin 2007; Beijing, 2007; in Chinese.
43. Li, B.; Peng, S. China's Agricultural Water Use Report 1998-2007; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, 2009; in Chinese.
44. Isard, W. Interregional and regional input-output analysis: A model of a space-economy. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1951, 318-328.
45. Chenery, H. Regional analysis. In The Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy; Chenery, H., Clark, P., Eds.; United States Mutual Security Agency: Rome, 1953; pp 97-129.
46. Moses, L. N. A general equilibrium model of production, interregional trade, and location of industry. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1960, 373-397.
47. Polenske, K. R. A Multiregional Input-Output Model for the United States; U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration: Washington, DC, 1970.
48. Miller, R. E.; Blair, P. D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge and New York, 2009.
49. SICC (The State Information Center of China). Multi-Regional Input-Output Model for China; Social Sciences Academic Press (China): Beijing, 2005; in Chinese.
50. Ichimura, S.; Wang, H. Interregional Input-Output Analysis of the Chinese Economy; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, 2007; in Chinese.
51. Liu, Q.; Okamoto, N. Establishing inter-region input-output model of China and its problems. Stat. Res. 2002, 9 ; in Chinese.
52. Zhang, Y.; Qi, S. China Multi-Regional Input-Output Models 2002-2007; Chemical Statistics Press: Beijing, 2012; in Chinese.
53. Erlander, S.; Stewart, N. F. The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis: Theory and Extensions; VSP: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
54. Liu, W. D.; Chen, J.; Tang, Z. P.; Liu, H. G.; Han, D.; Li, F. Y. Compliment Theory and Practice of China's Interregional Input-Output Table for 30 Regions in 2007; China Statistics Press: Beijing, 2012; in Chinese.
55. Costanza, R. Embodied energy and economic valuation. Science 1980, 210 (4475), 1219-1224.
56. Peters, G. P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65 (1), 13-23.
57. Machado, G.; Schaeffer, R.; Worrell, E. Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input-output approach. Ecol. Econ. 2001, 39 (3), 409-424.
58. Rasul, G. Food, water, and energy security in South Asia: A nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 39, 35-48.
59. Gu, A.; Teng, F.; Wang, Y. China energy-water nexus: Assessing the water-saving synergy effects of energy-saving policies during the eleventh Five-year Plan. Energy Convers. Manage. 2014, 85, 630-637.
60. Venkatesh, G.; Chan, A.; Brattebø, H. Understanding the waterenergy-carbon nexus in urban water utilities: Comparison of four city case studies and the relevant influencing factors. Energy 2014, 75, 153-166.
61. Talebpour, M. R.; Sahin, O.; Siems, R.; Stewart, R. A. Water and energy nexus of residential rainwater tanks at an end use level: Case of Australia. Energy Build. 2014, 80, 195-207.
62. Nair, S.; George, B.; Malano, H. M.; Arora, M.; Nawarathna, B. Water-energy-greenhouse gas nexus of urban water systems: Review of concepts, state-of-Art and methods. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 89, 1-10.
63. Nanduri, V.; Saavedra-Antolínez, I. A competitive Markov decision process model for the energy-water-climate change nexus. Appl. Energy 2013, 111, 186-198.
64. Ringler, C.; Bhaduri, A.; Lawford, R. The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): potential for improved resource use efficiency? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2013, 5 (6), 617-624.
65. Hoekstra, A. Y. Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68 (7), 1963-1974.