Inventory development and input-output model of U.S. Land use: Relating land in production to consumption

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 4937-4943

  Costello, Christine ^a   Griffin, W Michael ^a,b   Matthews, H Scott ^a   Weber, Christopher L ^a,c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Science and Technology Policy Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST PRODUCTS; FORESTRY INDUSTRY; HEALTHCARE SERVICES; INPUT OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INPUT OUTPUT MODEL; INVENTORY DEVELOPMENT; LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT; SERVICE INDUSTRIES; WEIGHTING SCHEME; WOOD-BASED PRODUCTS;

AGRICULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; HEALTH CARE; PROCESSED FOODS; PURCHASING; QUALITY CONTROL; SUPPLY CHAINS;

LAND USE;

BIOFUEL; CATTLE; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FOREST PRODUCT; HEALTH SERVICES; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INVENTORY; LAND USE CHANGE; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MANUFACTURING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SERVICE SECTOR;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CROPLAND; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD PROCESSING; FORESTRY; HEALTH SERVICE; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; METRIC SYSTEM; UNITED STATES; WOOD;

ENVIRONMENT; FOOD SUPPLY; MODELS, ECONOMIC; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

BOS;

EID: 79957877264     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es104245j     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. A guide to world resources 2000-2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, 2000.
2. Rees, W. E. and Wackernagel, M. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: Measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. In Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability; Jansson, A. M., Hammer, A. M., Folke, M., and Costanza, C., Eds., Island Press: Washington, DC, 1994.
3. Wurtenberger, T., Koellner, L., Binder, C. R. Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57, 679-697
4. Lenzen, M., Murray, S. A. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia Ecol. Econ. 2001, 37, 229-255 (Pubitemid 32453853)
5. Fabiosa, J. F., Beghin, J. C., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Tokgoz, S., Yu, T.-H., Land Allocation Effects of the Global Ethanol Surge: Predictions from the International FAPRI Model. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University: Ames, 2009; p 32.
6. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute FAPRI Models. http://www.fapri.iastate.edu/models/ (accessed May 25, 2010).
7. Hertel, T. W., Rose, S., Tol, R. S. J. Land Use in Computable General Equilibrium Models: An Overview; Global Trade Analysis Project: 2008.
8. Keeney, R., Hertel, T. W. The Indirect Land Use Impacts of U.S. Biofuel Policies: The Importance of Acreage, Yield, and Bilateral Trade Responses. Global Trade Analysis Project: 2008.
9. Kloverpris, J. H., Baltzer, K., Nielsen, P. H. Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2010, 15, 90-103
10. Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt., P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity PNAS 2011, 108 (9) 3465-3472
11. Erb, K.-H., Krausmann, F., Gaube, V., Gingrich, S., Bondeau, A., Fisher-Kowalski, M., Haberl, H. Analyzing the global human appropriation of net primary productivity - processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2), 250-259.
12. Hubacek, K., Giljum, S. Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities Ecol. Econ. 2003, 44, 137-151 (Pubitemid 36264247)
13. Wilting, H. C., Vringer, K. Carbon and land use accounting from a producer's and a consumer's perspective-an empirical examination covering the world Econ. Systems Res. 2009, 21 (3) 291-310
14. Yang, H., Wang, L., Abbaspour, K. C., Zehnder, A. J. B. Virtual water trade: an assessment of water use efficiency in the international food trade Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 10, 443-454 (Pubitemid 43992797)
15. Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., Savenije, H. H. G. Water saving through international trade of agricultural products Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 10, 455-468
16. Weber, C. L., Matthews, H. S. Embodied Emissions in U.S. International Trade: 1997:2004 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (14) 4875-4881 (Pubitemid 47121081)
17. 2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (5) 1401-1407 (Pubitemid 351416141)
18. Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., Barrett, J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities- Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 15-26 (Pubitemid 46223477)
19. Lindeijer, E. Review of land use impact methodologies J. Cleaner Prod. 2000, 8, 273-281
20. Schmidt, J. H. Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity J. Cleaner Prod. 2008, 16 (18) 1929-1942
21. Koellner, T., Scholz, R. W. Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 1: An analytical framework for pure land occupation and land use change Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2007, 12 (1) 16-23 (Pubitemid 46224698)
22. Koellner, T., Scholz, R. W. Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 2: Generic characterization factors for local species diversity in Central Europe Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2008, 13 (1) 32-48 (Pubitemid 351191464)
23. Canals, L. M. i., Romanya, J., Cowell, S. J. Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of 'fertile land' in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) J. Cleaner Prod. 2006, 15 (15) 1426-1440 (Pubitemid 46553862)
24. Barnett, J., Lambert, S., Fry, I. The hazards of indicators: Insights from the environmental vulnerability index Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2008, 98 (1) 102-119
25. Stewart, R. L., Stone, B. S., Streitwieser, M. L. U.S. Benchmark Input-Output Accounts, 2002; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis: Washington, DC, 2007.
26. Leontief, W. W. Input-Output Economics; Oxford University Press: New York, 1986.
27. Duchin, F. Input-Output Economics and Materials Flows. In Handbook on Input-Output Analysis in Industrial Ecology; Sangwon, S., Ed., Springer: Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, 2009; pp 23-41.
28. Marriott, J., Matthews, H. S. Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39 (22) 8584-8590
29. Joshi, S. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques J. Ind. Ecol. 2000, 3, 95-120
30. Miller, R. E., Blair, P. D. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, 1984; p 448.
31. Horowitz, K. J., Planting, M. A. Concepts and Methods of the Input-Output Accounts; U.S. Department of Commerce: Bureau of Economic Analysis: Washington, DC, 2006; updated 2009.
32. Weber, C. L., Peters, G. P., Guan, D., Hubacek. The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy 36 (9), 3572-3577.
33. Lubowski, R. N., Vesterby, M. S., Bucholtz; Baez, A., Roberts, M. J. (USDA, ERS), Major Uses of Land in the United States, 2002; 2006.
34. USGS. National Land Cover Dataset. 1992. http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd- product-desc.php (accessed May 25, 2010).
35. USDA. 2002 Census of Agriculture. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/ Publications/2002/index.asp (accessed May 25, 2010).
36. USDA. Agricultural Statistics Annual. http://www.nass.usda.gov/ Publications/Ag-Statistics/ (accessed June 2, 2010).
37. U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration. Addendum to the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study, Final Report. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/hcas/addendum.htm (accessed month day, year).
38. U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration. Highway Statistics 2006. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs06/index.htm (accessed May 25, 2010).
39. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2002, Energy Consumption by Manufacturers - Data Table. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/mecs/mecs2006/ 2006tables.html (accessed May 31, 2010).
40. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2003, CBECS Detailed Tables. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed-tables-2003/ detailed-tables-2003.html (accessed May 31, 2010).
41. U.S. Census Bureau. County Business Patterns. http://www.census.gov/econ/ cbp/historical.htm (accessed May 31, 2010).
42. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Global Agricultural Trade System Online. http://www.fas.usda.gov/gats/default.aspx (accessed May 26, 2010).
43. Tukker, A., Jansen, B. Environmental impacts of products-A detailed review of studies J. Ind. Ecol. 2006, 10 (3) 159-182 (Pubitemid 44689529)
44. Weber, C. L., Matthews, H. S. Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (10) 3508-3513 (Pubitemid 351694052)
45. Adler, P. R., Del Grosso, S. J., Parton, W. J. Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17 (3) 675-691 (Pubitemid 46607427)
46. USDA. Forest Service. Forest Resources of the United States: Washington, DC, 2008.