Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption, and international trade

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 172-179

  Kanemoto, Keiichiro ^a,b   Lenzen, Manfred ^a   Peters, Glen P ^c   Moran, Daniel D ^a   Geschke, Arne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OSLO CICERO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILATERAL TRADE; CARBON BALANCE; CARBON EMISSIONS; CARBON LEAKAGE; DECISION MAKERS; DOMESTIC EMISSIONS; EMISSION INVENTORIES; GLOBAL EMISSIONS; GLOBAL POLICIES; INPUT-OUTPUT; TRADE BALANCE;

CARBON; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON BALANCE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMISSION INVENTORY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; MONETARY POLICY; TRADE FLOW;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EMISSION EMBODIED IN BILATERAL TRADE METHOD; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; MONEY; MULTIREGIONAL INPUT OUTPUT ANALYSIS; POLLUTION MONITORING;

CARBON FOOTPRINT; COMMERCE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; INTERNATIONALITY; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84855306481     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es202239t     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Nansai, K.; Kagawa, S.; Kondo, Y.; Suh, S.; Inaba, R.; Nakajima, K. Improving the completeness of product carbon footprints using a global link input-output model: The case of Japan Econ. Syst. Res. 2009, 21 (3) 267-290
2. Hertwich, E. G.; Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of nations: A Global, trade-linked analysis Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (16) 6414-6420
3. Zhou, X., How does trade adjustment influence national inventory of open economies? Accounting embodied carbon based on multi-region input-output model. In International Forum on Sustainable Asia and the Pacific; Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES): Shonan, Japan, 2009.
4. Peters, G. Managing carbon leakage Carbon Manage. 2010, 1 (1) 35-37
5. 2 multipliers in multi-region input-output models Econ. Syst. Res. 2004, 16 (4) 391-412
6. Wiedmann, T.; Lenzen, M.; Turner, K.; Barrett, J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61 (1) 15-26
7. Peters, G.; Hertwich, E. G. Post-Kyoto greenhouse gas inventories: Production versus consumption Clim. Change 2008, 86, 51-66
8. Wiedmann, T. A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 211-222
9. Peters, G.; Minx, J.; Weber, C.; Edenhofer, O. Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, not supplied.
10. Lenzen, M.; Murray, J. Conceptualising environmental responsibility Ecol. Econ. 2010, 70 (2) 261-270
11. Lenzen, M.; Murray, J.; Sack, F.; Wiedmann, T. Shared producer and consumer responsibility-theory and practice Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61 (1) 27-42
12. 2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? Energy Policy 2001, 29 (4) 327-334
13. Rodrigues, J.; Domingos, T. Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: comparing two approaches Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66, 533-546
14. Andrew, R.; Forgie, V. A three-perspective view of greenhouse gas emission responsibilities in New Zealand Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68 (1-2) 194-204
15. Peters, G. P. Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2010, 2, 245-250
16. Wiedmann, T. Editorial: Carbon footprint and input-output analysis: an introduction Econ. Syst. Res. 2009, 21 (3) 175-186
17. Minx, J.; Wiedmann, T.; Wood, R.; Peters, G. P.; Lenzen, M.; Owen, A.; Scott, K.; Barrett, J.; Hubacek, K.; Baiocchi, G.; Paul, A.; Dawkins, E.; Briggs, J.; Guan, D.; Suh, S.; Ackerman, F. Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting: An overview of applications Econ. Syst. Res. 2009, 21 (3) 187-216
18. Wiedmann, T.; Wood, R.; Lenzen, M.; Minx, J.; Guan, D.; Barrett, J. The carbon footprint of the UK-Results from a multi-region input-output model Econ. Syst. Res. 2010, 22 (1) 19-42
19. Peters, G.; Marland, G.; Hertwich, E.; Saikku, L.; Rautiainen, A.; Kauppi, P. Trade, transport, and sinks extend the carbon dioxide responsibility of countries: An editorial essay Clim. Change 2009, 97 (3) 379-388
20. Peters, G.; Solli, C. Global Carbon Footprints: Methods and Import/Export Corrected Results from the Nordic Countries in Global Carbon Footprint Studies; Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010.
21. Leontief, W. Quantitative input and output relations in the economic system of the United States Rev. Econ. Stat. 1936, 18 (3) 105-125
22. Leontief, W., Input-Output Economics; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 1966.
23. Isard, W. Interregional and regional input-output analysis, a model of a space economy Rev. Econ. Stat. 1951, 33, 318-328
24. Leontief, W., Interregional theory. In Studies in the Structure of the American Economy; Leontief, W.; Chenery, H. B.; Clark, P. G.; Duesenberry, J. S.; Ferguson, A. R.; Grosse, A. P.; Grosse, R. N.; Holzman, M.; Isard, W.; Kistin, H., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 1953; pp 93-115.
25. Oosterhaven, J. A family of square and rectangular interregional input-output tables and models Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 1984, 14 (4) 565-582
26. Ayres, R. U.; Kneese, A. V. Production, consumption, and externalities Am. Econ. Rev. 1969, 59, 282-297
27. Leontief, W.; Ford, D. Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: An input-output approach Rev. Econ. Stat. 1970, 52 (3) 262-271
28. Wiedmann, T.; Wilting, H. C.; Lenzen, M.; Lutter, S.; Palm, V. Quo vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70 (11) 1937-1945
29. Heijungs, R.; Suh, S., The Computational Structure of Life Cycle Assessment; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2002.
30. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division. Handbook of Input-Output Table Compilation and Analysis; United Nations: New York, 1999.
31. United Nations; European Commission; International Monetary Fund; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; World Bank System of National Accounts 2008; New York, USA, 2009.
32. UNSD. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting; United Nations Statistics Division: New York, 2003; http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envAccounting/seea2003.pdf.
33. EC. NAMEAs for Air Emissions: Results of Pilot Studies; European Communities: Luxembourg, 2001.
34. IPCC. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/methodology-reports.htm.
35. Pedersen, O.; de Haan, M. The system of environmental and economic accounts 2003 and the economic relevance of physical flow accounting J. Ind. Ecol. 2006, 10, 19-42
36. ISO. ISO 14041: Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Goal and Scope Definition and Inventory Analysis, 14041; International Organisation for Standardisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998.
37. Wiedmann, T.; Minx, J., A definition of 'carbon footprint'. In Ecological Economics Research Trends; Pertsova, C. C., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge NY, 2008; Vol. 1, Chapter 1, pp 1-11; https://www.novapublishers.com/ catalog/product-info.php?products-id=5999, also available as Research Report 07/01 from the Centre for Sustainability Accounting, http://www.censa.org.uk/ reports.html.
38. Peters, G. P. From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65 (1) 13-23
39. Gallego, B.; Lenzen, M. A consistent input-output formulation of shared consumer and producer responsibility Econ. Syst. Res. 2005, 17 (4) 365-391
40. Atkinson, G.; Hamilton, K.; Ruta, G.; van der Mensbrugghe, D. Trade in "virtual carbon": Empirical results and implications for policy Global Environ. Change 2011, 21 (2) 563-574
41. Serrano, M.; Dietzenbacher, E. Responsibility and trade emission balances: An evaluation of approaches Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69 (11) 2224-2232
42. Weber, C. L.; Matthews, H. S. Embodied environmental emissions in U.S. international trade, 1997-2004 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41 (14) 4875-4881
43. 2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (5) 1401-1407
44. Zhou, X.; Liu, X. Q.; Kojima, S. Carbon Emissions Embodied in International Trade: An assessment from the Asian perspective; Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES): Hayama, Japan, 2010.
45. Andrews, M.; Lennox, J.; Peters, G. Greenhouse gas emissions embodied in New Zealand's trade: Methodology. In 18th International Input-Output Conference; Rueda-Cantuche, J. M.; Hubacek, K., Eds.; Sydney, Australia, 2010.
46. Peters, G., Constructing an environmentally-extended multi-region input-output table using the GTAP database. Econ. Syst. Res. 2011, 23 (2), 131 - 152.