Histone variant H2A.X deposition pattern serves as a functional epigenetic mark for distinguishing the developmental potentials of iPSCs

Cell Stem Cell

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 281-294

  Wu, Tao ^a   Liu, Yifei ^a   Wen, Duancheng ^b   Tseng, Zito ^a   Tahmasian, Martik ^a   Zhong, Mei ^a   Rafii, Shahin ^b   Stadtfeld, Matthias ^c,d   Hochedlinger, Konrad ^c   Xiao, Andrew ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H2AX; H2AFX PROTEIN, MOUSE; HISTONE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL MATURATION; EMBRYO MEMBRANE; EPIGENETICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TETRAPLOIDY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CLONE; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH MOUSE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE;

ANIMALIA; IPS;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CELL LINEAGE; CLONE CELLS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HISTONES; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE, INBRED ICR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; UP-REGULATION;

EID: 84924959050     PISSN: 19345909     EISSN: 18759777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adachi, K., Nikaido, I., Ohta, H., Ohtsuka, S., Ura, H., Kadota, M., Wakayama, T., Ueda, H.R., and Niwa, H. (2013). Context-dependent wiring of Sox2 regulatory networks for self-renewal of embryonic and trophoblast stem cells. Mol. Cell 52, 380-392.
2. Banaszynski, L.A., Allis, C.D., and Lewis, P.W. (2010). Histone variants in metazoan development. Dev. Cell 19, 662-674.
3. Bassing, C.H., Chua, K.F., Sekiguchi, J., Suh, H., Whitlow, S.R., Fleming, J.C., Monroe, B.C., Ciccone, D.N., Yan, C., Vlasakova, K., et al. (2002). Increased ionizing radiation sensitivity and genomic instability in the absence of histone H2AX. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8173-8178.
4. Bilodeau, S., Kagey, M.H., Frampton, G.M., Rahl, P.B., and Young, R.A. (2009). SetDB1 contributes to repression of genes encoding developmental regulators and maintenance of ES cell state. Genes Dev. 23, 2484-2489.
5. Bracken, A.P., Dietrich, N., Pasini, D., Hansen, K.H., and Helin, K. (2006). Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev. 20, 1123-1136.
6. Brinkman, A.B., Gu, H., Bartels, S.J.J., Zhang, Y., Matarese, F., Simmer, F., Marks, H., Bock, C., Gnirke, A., Meissner, A., and Stunnenberg, H.G. (2012). Sequential ChIP-bisulfite sequencing enables direct genome-scale investigation of chromatin and DNA methylation cross-talk. Genome Res. 22, 1128-1138.
7. Buganim, Y., Faddah, D.A., and Jaenisch, R. (2013). Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 427-439.
8. Cahan, P., and Daley, G.Q. (2013). Origins and implications of pluripotent stem cell variability and heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 357-368.
9. Celeste, A., Petersen, S., Romanienko, P.J., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Chen, H.T., Sedelnikova, O.A., Reina-San-Martin, B., Coppola, V., Meffre, E., Difilippantonio, M.J., et al. (2002). Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296, 922-927.
10. Fragola, G., Germain, P.-L., Laise, P., Cuomo, A., Blasimme, A., Gross, F., Signaroldi, E., Bucci, G., Sommer, C., Pruneri, G., et al. (2013). Cell reprogramming requires silencing of a core subset of polycomb targets. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003292.
11. González, F., Georgieva, D., Vanoli, F., Shi, Z.-D., Stadtfeld, M., Ludwig, T., Jasin, M., and Huangfu, D. (2013). Homologous recombination DNA repair genes play a critical role in reprogramming to a pluripotent state. Cell Reports 3, 651-660.
12. Haffner-Krausz, R., Gorivodsky, M., Chen, Y., and Lonai, P. (1999). Expression of Fgfr2 in the early mouse embryo indicates its involvement in preimplantation development. Mech. Dev. 85, 167-172.
13. Heinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y.C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J.X., Murre, C., Singh, H., and Glass, C.K. (2010). Simple combinations of lineagedetermining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576-589.
14. Ivanova, N., Dobrin, R., Lu, R., Kotenko, I., Levorse, J., DeCoste, C., Schafer, X., Lun, Y., and Lemischka, I.R. (2006). Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442, 533-538.
15. Koh, K.P., Yabuuchi, A., Rao, S., Huang, Y., Cunniff, K., Nardone, J., Laiho, A., Tahiliani, M., Sommer, C.A., Mostoslavsky, G., et al. (2011). Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8, 200-213.
16. Liu, L., Luo, G.-Z., Yang, W., Zhao, X., Zheng, Q., Lv, Z., Li, W., Wu, H.-J., Wang, L., Wang, X.-J., and Zhou, Q. (2010). Activation of the imprinted Dlk1-Dio3 region correlates with pluripotency levels of mouse stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 19483-19490.
17. Mager, J., Montgomery, N.D., de Villena, F.P.-M., and Magnuson, T. (2003). Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse Polycomb group protein Eed. Nat. Genet. 33, 502-507.
18. Mahony, S., and Benos, P.V. (2007). STAMP: a web tool for exploring DNAbinding motif similarities. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W253-W258.
19. Marión, R.M., Strati, K., Li, H., Murga, M., Blanco, R., Ortega, S., Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Serrano, M., and Blasco, M.A. (2009). A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity. Nature 460, 1149-1153.
20. Matsui, T., Leung, D., Miyashita, H., Maksakova, I.A., Miyachi, H., Kimura, H., Tachibana, M., Lorincz, M.C., and Shinkai, Y. (2010). Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature 464, 927-931.
21. Micsinai, M., Parisi, F., Strino, F., Asp, P., Dynlacht, B.D., and Kluger, Y. (2012). Picking ChIP-seq peak detectors for analyzing chromatin modification experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e70.
22. Müller, L.U.W., Milsom, M.D., Harris, C.E., Vyas, R., Brumme, K.M., Parmar, K., Moreau, L.A., Schambach, A., Park, I.-H., London, W.B., et al. (2012). Overcoming reprogramming resistance of Fanconi anemia cells. Blood 119, 5449-5457.
23. Narsinh, K.H., Sun, N., Sanchez-Freire, V., Lee, A.S., Almeida, P., Hu, S., Jan, T., Wilson, K.D., Leong, D., Rosenberg, J., et al. (2011). Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 1217-1221.
24. Ng, R.K., Dean, W., Dawson, C., Lucifero, D., Madeja, Z., Reik, W., and Hemberger, M. (2008). Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 1280-1290.
25. Nishiyama, A., Xin, L., Sharov, A.A., Thomas, M., Mowrer, G., Meyers, E., Piao, Y., Mehta, S., Yee, S., Nakatake, Y., et al. (2009). Uncovering early response of gene regulatory networks in ESCs by systematic induction of transcription factors. Cell Stem Cell 5, 420-433.
26. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J., and Smith, A.G. (2000). Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat. Genet. 24, 372-376.
27. Niwa, H., Toyooka, Y., Shimosato, D., Strumpf, D., Takahashi, K., Yagi, R., and Rossant, J. (2005). Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123, 917-929.
28. Oda, M., Shiota, K., and Tanaka, S. (2006). Trophoblast stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 419, 387-400.
29. Orkin, S.H., and Hochedlinger, K. (2011). Chromatin connections to pluripotency and cellular reprogramming. Cell 145, 835-850.
30. Rada-Iglesias, A., Bajpai, R., Swigut, T., Brugmann, S.A., Flynn, R.A., and Wysocka, J. (2011). A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279-283.
31. Ralston, A., Cox, B.J., Nishioka, N., Sasaki, H., Chea, E., Rugg-Gunn, P., Guo, G., Robson, P., Draper, J.S., and Rossant, J. (2010). Gata3 regulates trophoblast development downstream of Tead4 and in parallel to Cdx2. Development 137, 395-403.
32. Redon, C., Pilch, D., Rogakou, E., Sedelnikova, O., Newrock, K., and Bonner, W. (2002). Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 162-169.
33. Rossant, J. (2007). Stem cells and lineage development in the mammalian blastocyst. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 19, 111-118.
34. Song, Q., and Smith, A.D. (2011). Identifying dispersed epigenomic domains from ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 27, 870-871.
35. Stadtfeld, M., Apostolou, E., Akutsu, H., Fukuda, A., Follett, P., Natesan, S., Kono, T., Shioda, T., and Hochedlinger, K. (2010a). Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 465, 175-181.
36. Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Borkent, M., and Hochedlinger, K. (2010b). A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells. Nat. Methods 7, 53-55.
37. Strumpf, D., Mao, C.-A., Yamanaka, Y., Ralston, A., Chawengsaksophak, K., Beck, F., and Rossant, J. (2005). Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 132, 2093-2102.
38. Yuan, P., Han, J., Guo, G., Orlov, Y.L., Huss, M., Loh, Y.-H., Yaw, L.-P., Robson, P., Lim, B., and Ng, H.-H. (2009). Eset partners with Oct4 to restrict extraembryonic trophoblast lineage potential in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 23, 2507-2520.