Three-dimensional arrangement of β-tricalcium phosphate granules evaluated by microcomputed tomography and fractal analysis

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 404-411

  Ndiaye, Mambaye ^a   Terranova, Lisa ^a   Mallet, Romain ^a,b   Mabilleau, Guillaume ^a,b   Chappard, Daniel ^a,b  

^a UNIV Angers   (France)

^b LUNAM Universite   (France)

Author keywords

Fractal geometry; Granular material; Lacunarity; Succolarity; TCP

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FRACTAL DIMENSION; GRANULAR MATERIALS; POROSITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SINTERING; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

3D SPACES; BONE DEFECT; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; FRACTAL GEOMETRY; LACUNARITY; MICRO COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (MICRO-CT); PROPERTY; SUCCOLARITY; TRI-CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; Β-TCP;

GRANULATION;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; BONE PROSTHESIS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; BONE PROSTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFORMATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FRACTALS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; POROSITY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84924854997     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ghosh SK, Nandi SK, Kundu B, Datta S, De DK, Roy SK, et al. In vivo response of porous hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate prepared by aqueous solution combustion method and comparison with bioglass scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;86:217-27.
2. Ikeda N, Kawanabe K, Nakamura T. Quantitative comparison of osteoconduction of porous, dense A-W glass-ceramic and hydroxyapatite granules (effects of granule and pore sizes). Biomaterials 1999;20:1087-95.
3. Habibovic P, Yuan H, van der Valk CM, Meijer G, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. 3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials. Biomaterials 2005;26:3565-75.
4. Yuan H, de Bruijn JD, Zhang X, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. Bone induction by porous glass ceramic made from bioglass (45S5). J Biomed Mater Res 2001;58:270-6.
5. Ripamonti U. Osteoinduction in porous hydroxyapatite implanted in heterotopic sites of different animal models. Biomaterials 1996;17:31-5.
6. Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, Hojo M, Hollister SJ. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 2006;27:3964-72.
7. Dutta Roy T, Simon JL, Ricci JL, Rekow ED, Thompson VP, Parsons JR. Performance of hydroxyapatite bone repair scaffolds created via three-dimensional fabrication techniques. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A 2003;67:1228-37.
8. Filmon R, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Grizon F, Galloyer M, Cincu C, Baslé MF, et al. Non-connected versus interconnected macroporosity in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) polymers. An X-ray microtomographic and histomorphometric study. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2002;13:1105-17.
9. Chazono M, Tanaka T, Kitasato S, Kikuchi T, Marumo K. Electron microscopic study on bone formation and bioresorption after implantation of beta-tricalcium phosphate in rabbit models. J Orthop Sci 2008;13:550-5.
10. Daculsi G, Laboux O, Malard O, Weiss P. Current state of the art of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics. J Mater Sci - Mater Med 2003;14:195-200.
11. Filmon R, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Brossard G, Grizon-Pascaretti F, Baslé MF, Chappard D. Preparation of β-TCP granular material by polyurethane foam technology. Image Anal Stereol 2009;28:1-10.
12. Chappard D, Legrand E, Baslé MF, Fromont P, Racineux JL, Rebel A, et al. Altered trabecular architecture induced by corticosteroids: a bone histomorphometric study. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:676-85.
13. Chappard D, Legrand E, Pascaretti C, Baslé MF, Audran M. Comparison of eight histomorphometric methods for measuring trabecular bone architecture by image analysis on histological sections. Microsc Res Tech 1999;45:303-12.
14. Chappard D, Legrand E, Haettich B, Chales G, Auvinet B, Eschard JP, et al. Fractal dimension of trabecular bone: comparison of three histomorphometric computed techniques for measuring the architectural two-dimensional complexity. J Pathol 2001;195:515-21.
15. Fazzalari NL, Parkinson IH. Fractal properties of subchondral cancellous bone in severe osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:632-40.
16. Haire TJ, Hodgskinson R, Ganney PS, Langton CM. A comparison of porosity, fabric and fractal dimension as predictors of the Young's modulus of equine cancellous bone. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:588-93.
17. Hu BX, Meerschaert MM, Barrash W, Hyndman DW, He C, Li X, et al. Examining the influence of heterogeneous porosity fields on conservative solute transport. J Contam Hydrol 2009;108:77-88.
18. de Melo RHC. Using fractal characteristics such as fractal dimension, lacunarity and succolarity to characterize texture patterns on images. Fluminense: Fed. Univ. Fluminense (Brazil); 2007 Link: 〈http://www.ic.uff.br/-rmelo/msc-thesis.htm〉.
19. de Melo RHC, Conci A. How succolarity could be used as another fractal measure in image analysis. Telecom Syst 2013;52:1643-55.
20. Shahzad F, Mahmood SA, Gloaguen R. Nonlinear analysis of drainage systems to examine surface deformation: an example from Potwar Plateau (Northern Pakistan). Nonlinear Proc Geophys 2010;17:137-47.
21. Mandelbrot B. The fractal geometry of nature. New York: Freeman; 1977.
22. Schwartzwalder K, Somers H, Somers AV. Method of making porous ceramics. US Patent 3090094 A; 1963.
23. Le HM, Holmes RE, Shors E, Rosenstein DA. Computerized quantitative analysis of the interconnectivity of porous biomaterials. Acta Stereol 1992;11S1:267-72.
24. Levitz P, Tchoubar D. Disordered porous solids: from chord distributions to small angle scattering. J Phys 1992;I(2):771-90.
25. Compston JE. Connectivity of cancellous bone: assessment and mechanical implications. Bone 1994;15:463-6.
26. Mellish RW, Ferguson-Pell MW, Cochran GV, Lindsay R, Dempster DW. A new manual method for assessing two-dimensional cancellous bone structure: comparison between iliac crest and lumbar vertebra. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:689-96.
27. Compston JE, Mellish RW, Garrahan NJ. Age-related changes in iliac crest trabecular microanatomic bone structure in man. Bone 1987;8:289-92.
28. Allain C, Cloitre M. Characterizing the lacunarity of random and deterministic fractal sets. Phys Rev A 1991;44. A3552-8.
29. N'Diaye M, Degeratu C, Bouler JM, Chappard D. Biomaterial porosity determined by fractal dimensions, succolarity and lacunarity on microcomputed tomographic images. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2013;33:2025-30.
30. Chappard D, Guillaume B, Mallet R, Pascaretti-Grizon F, Baslé MF, Libouban H. Sinus lift augmentation and beta-TCP: a microCT and histologic analysis on human bone biopsies. Micron 2010;41:321-6.
31. Heckel R. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans Metall Soc AIME 1961;221:1001-8.
32. Kadiri MS. Compression de poudres pharmaceutiques et interaction avec l'outillage. Analyse expérimentale et modélisation numérique: Univ. Toulouse; 2004.
33. Witkowska-Zimny M, Walenko K, Wrobel E, Mrowka P, Mikulska A, Przybylski J. Effect of substrate stiffness on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells and bone-derived cells. Cell Biol Int 2013;37:608-16.
34. Jones JR, Poologasundarampillai G, Atwood RC, Bernard D, Lee PD. Nondestructive quantitative 3D analysis for the optimisation of tissue scaffolds. Biomaterials 2007;28:1404-13.
35. Guldberg RE, Duvall CL, Peister A, Oest ME, Lin AS, Palmer AW, et al. 3D imaging of tissue integration with porous biomaterials. Biomaterials 2008;29:3757-61.
36. Laib A, Ruegsegger P. Calibration of trabecular bone structure measurements of in vivo three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography with 28-microm-resolution microcomputed tomography. Bone 1999;24:35-9.
37. Sasov A, Van Dyck D. Desktop X-ray microscopy and microtomography. J Microsc 1998;191:151-8.
38. Chappard D, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Legrand E, Baslé MF, Audran M. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:1177-84.
39. Hordon LD, Itoda M, Shore PA, Shore RC, Heald M, Brown M, et al. Preservation of thoracic spine microarchitecture by alendronate: comparison of histology and microCT. Bone 2006;38:444-9.
40. Alexander JM, Bab I, Fish S, Muller R, Uchiyama T, Gronowicz G, et al. Human parathyroid hormone 1-34 reverses bone loss in ovariectomized mice. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16:1665-73.
41. th international conference on systems, signal and image processing and semantic multimodal analysis of digital media (IWSSIP 2006). Budapest: IEEE Signal Process Society; 2006. p. 299-302.
42. Klein M, Goetz H, Pazen S, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W, Duschner H. Pore characteristics of bone substitute materials assessed by microcomputed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:67-74.
43. Zeng Y, Payton R, Gantzer C, Anderson S. Fractal dimension and lacunarity of bulk density determined with X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1996;60:1718-24.
44. Chun HC, Giménez D, Yoon SW. Morphology, lacunarity and entropy of intraaggregate pores: aggregate size and soil management effects. Geoderma 2008;146:83-93.
45. Latief FDE, Fauzi U. Kozeny-Carman and empirical formula for the permeability of computer rock models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2012;50:117-23.