In-situ hybridization of calcium silicate and hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposites enhances physical property and in vitro osteogenesis

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Chiu, Chi Kai ^a   Lee, Dong Joon ^a   Chen, Hsin ^a   Chow, Laurence C ^b   Ko, Ching Chang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; COLLAGEN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; HYDRATED LIME; HYDROXYAPATITE; LIME; NANOCOMPOSITES; RAT CONTROL; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SILICA; SILICATES; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; TISSUE REGENERATION;

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE (CA2); CLINICAL APPLICATION; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INTERFACIAL BINDING; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; POWDER X RAY DIFFRACTION; REINFORCEMENT MECHANISMS; SYNTHETIC MATERIALS;

CALCIUM SILICATE;

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CALCIUM SILICATE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; GELATIN; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOCOMPOSITE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILOXANE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; SILICATE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MINERAL; BONE MINERALIZATION; CALVARIA; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COLLAGEN FIBER; COLLAGEN SYNTHESIS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SKULL DEFECT; SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFT; THERMOGRAVIMETRY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANIMAL; BIOPHYSICS; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; INJURIES; MATERIALS TESTING; MOUSE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SKULL; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURGERY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

RATTUS;

3T3 CELLS; ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; BONE REGENERATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; DURAPATITE; GELATIN; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; NANOCOMPOSITES; OSTEOGENESIS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SILICATES; SILOXANES; SKULL; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84924787585     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5456-9     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6.
2. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2529–43.
3. Griffith LG, Naughton G. Tissue engineering-current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science. 2002;295:1009–14.
4. Yang SF, Leong KF, Du ZH, Chua CK. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:679–89.
5. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:S96–101.
6. Mistry AS, Mikos AG. Tissue engineering strategies for bone regeneration. In Regenerative Medicine Ii: Clinical and Preclinical Applications. New York: Springer; 2005. Pp. 1–22.
7. Du C, Cui FZ, Zhu XD, de Groot K. Three-dimensional nano-HAp/collagen matrix loading with osteogenic cells in organ culture. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;44:407–15.
8. Itoh S, Kikuchi M, Takakuda K, Nagaoka K, Koyama Y, Tanaka J, Shinomiya K. Implantation study of a novel hydroxyapatite/collagen (HAp/Col) composite into weight-bearing sites of dogs. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:507–15.
9. Chang MC, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Preparation of hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposite. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2853–62.
10. Kim HW, Kim HE, Salih V. Stimulation of osteoblast responses to biomimetic nanocomposites of gelatin-hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5221–30.
11. Kim HW, Song JH, Kim HE. Nanoriber generation of gelatin-hydroxyapatite biomimetics for guided tissue regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2005;15:1988–94.
12. Shie MY, Chen CH, Wang CY, Chiang TY, Ding SJ. Immersion behavior of gelatin-containing calcium phosphate cement. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:646–55.
13. Bigi A, Bracci B, Panzavolta S. Effect of added gelatin on the properties of calcium phosphate cement. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2893–9.
14. Ding SJ, Wei CK, Lai MH. Bio-inspired calcium silicate-gelatin bone grafts for load-bearing applications. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:12793–802.
15. Radev L, Hristov V, Fernandes MHV, Salvado IMM. Organic/inorganic bioactive materials Part IV: in vitro assessment of bioactivity of gelatin-calcium phosphate silicate/wollastonite hybrids. Cent Eur J Chem. 2010;8:278–84.
16. Chiu CK, Ferreira J, Luo TZ, Geng H, Lin FC, Ko CC. Direct scaffolding of biomimetic hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposites using aminosilane cross-linker for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci. 2012;23:2115–26.
17. Dolado JS, Campillo I, Erkizia E, Ibanez JA, Porro A, Guerrero A, Goni S. Effect of nanosilica additions on Belite Cement pastes held in sulfate solutions. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:3973–6.
18. 2 addition on properties of hardened cement paste as compared with silica fume. Constr Build Mater. 2005;21:539–45.
19. Zhao WY, Wang JY, Zhai WY, Wang Z, Chang J. The self-setting properties and in vitro bioactivity of tricalcium silicate. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6113–21.
20. Kikuchi M, Cho SB, Tanaka J, Koyama Y, Kobayashi T, Takakuda K, Akao M. Preparation and biocompatibility of beta -tricalcium-phosphate/copolymerized-poly-l-lactide composite. J Japan Soc Powder Powder Metall. 1998;45:36–40.
21. Dyke JC, Knoght KJ, Huaxing Z, Chiu CK, Ko C, You W. An investigation of siloxane cross-linked hydroxyapatite-gelatin/copolymer composites for potential orthopedic applications. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:22888–98.
22. Ferreira JR, Hirsch ML, Zhang L, Park R, Samulski RJ, Hu WS, Ko CC. Three-dimensional multipotent progenitor cell aggregates for expansion, osteogenic differentiation and ‘in vivo’ tracing with AAV vector serotype 6. Gene Ther. 2012;20:158–68.
23. Ferreira JR, Padilla R, Urkasemsin G, Yoon K, Goeckner K, Hu WS, Ko CC. Titanium-enriched hydroxyapatite-gelatin scaffolds with osteogenically differentiated progenitor cell aggregates for calvaria bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:1803–16.
24. Luo TJM, Ko CC, Chiu CK, Llyod J, Huh U. Aminosilane as an effective binder for hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposites. J Sol–Gel Sci Technol. 2010;53:459–65.
25. Farhat IA, Orset S, Moreau P, Blanshard JM. FTIR study of hydration phenomena in protein-sugar systems. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;207:200–8.
26. Baciu D, Simitzis J. Synthesis and characterization of a calcium silicate bioactive glass. J Optoelectron Adv Mater. 2007;9:3320–4.
27. Ward AG. The science and technology of gelatin. London: Academic Press; 1977. p. 258–60.
28. Valenti GL, Cioffi R. Quantitative-determination of calcium hydroxide in the presence of calcium silicate hydrates—comparison between chemical-extraction and thermal-analysis. J Mater Sci Lett. 1985;4:475–8.
29. Bjornstrom J, Martinelli A, Matic A, Borjesson L, Panas I. Accelerating effects of colloidal nano-silica for beneficial calcium-silicate-hydrate formation in cement. Chem Phys Lett. 2004;392:242–8.
30. Fujitsu M, Hattori M, Tamura T. Effects of hydroxy compounds on gel formation of gelatin. Colloid Polym Sci. 1997;275:67–72.
31. Veis A. The macromolecular chemistry of gelatin. New York: Academic Press; 1964. p. 196–9.
32. Ko CC, Oyen M, Fallgatter AM, Hu W-S. Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility of biomimetic hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposites. J Mater Res. 2006;21:3090–8.
33. 2+ ions in gelatin-siloxane hybrids through a sol-gel process. J Ceram Soc Jpn. 2001;109:406–11.
34. Fujishiro Y, Takahashi K, Sato T. Preparation and compressive strength of alpha-tricalcium phosphate/gelatin gel composite cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:525–30.
35. Matsuyuma H, Young JF. Synthesis of calcium silicate hydrate/polymer complexes: part I. Anionic and nonionic polymers. J Mater Res. 1999;14:3379–88.
36. Minet J, Abramson S, Bresson B, Franceschini A, Van Damme H, Lequeux N. Organic calcium silicate hydrate hybrids: a new approach to cement based nanocomposites. J Mater Chem. 2006;16:1379–83.
37. Hoppe A, Guldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2757–74.
38. Raucci A, Bellosta P, Grassi R, Basilico C, Mansukhani A. Osteoblast proliferation or differentiation is regulated by relative strengths of opposing signaling pathways. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215:442–51.
39. Maeno S, Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Morioka H, Yatabe T, Funayama A, Toyama Y, Taguchi T, Tanaka J. The effect of calcium ion concentration on osteoblast viability, proliferation and differentiation in monolayer and 3D culture. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4847–55.
40. Eklou-Kalonji E, Denis I, Lieberherr M, Pointillart A. Effects of extracellular calcium on the proliferation and differentiation of porcine osteoblasts in vitro. Cell Tissue Res. 1998;292:163–71.
41. Wu Y-L. Interaction of bone cells with biomimetic hydroxyapatite gelatin nanocomposites towards developing bone tissue engineering. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Minnesota. 2007.