Navigation surgery using an augmented reality for pancreatectomy

Digestive Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 117-123

  Okamoto, Tomoyoshi ^a   Onda, Shinji ^b   Yasuda, Jungo ^a   Yanaga, Katsuhiko ^b   Suzuki, Naoki ^b   Hattori, Asaki ^b  

^a JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b JIKEI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Navigation surgery; Pancreatectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CYSTADENOMA; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS RESECTION; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; CYSTADENOMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84924712917     PISSN: 02534886     EISSN: 14219883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000371860     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Lamadé W, Vetter M, Hassenpflug P, et al: Navigation and image-guided HBP surgery: A review and preview. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9: 592-599.
2. Shuhaiber JH: Augmented reality in surgery. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 170-174.
3. Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, et al: Impact of virtual tumor resection and computerassisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 629-638; discussion 638.
4. Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J: Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 2011; 20: 189-201.
5. Mezger U, Jendrewski C, Bartels M: Navigation in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398: 501-514.
6. Grunert P, Darabi K, Espinosa J, Filippi R: Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Rev 2003; 26: 73-99; discussion 100-101.
7. Markiewicz MR, Bell RB: Traditional and contemporary surgical approaches to the orbit. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012; 24: 573-607.
8. Okamoto T, Onda S, Matsumoto M, et al: Utility of augmented reality system in hepatobiliary surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 249-253.
9. Onda S, Okamoto T, Kanehira M, et al: Short rigid scope and stereo-scope designed specifically for open abdominal navigation surgery: clinical application for hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; 20: 448-453.
10. Onda S, Okamoto T, Kanehira M, et al: Identification of inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery during pancreaticoduodenectomy using augmented reality-based navigation system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2014; 21: 281-287.
11. Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Marcus HJ, et al: Augmented reality partial nephrectomy: examining the current status and future perspectives. Urology 2014; 83: 266-273.
12. Matsuda T: Recent advances in urologic laparoscopic surgeries: laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, robotics and navigation. Asian J Endosc Surg 2013; 6: 68-77.
13. Ohashi K, Murakami Y, Maruyama M, et al: Four cases of 'mucin-producing' cancer of the pancreas on specific findings of the papilla of Vater (in Japanese). Prog Dig Endosc 1982; 20: 348-351.
14. Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al: International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183-197.
15. Furukawa T, Klöppel G, Volkan Adsay N, et al: Classification of types of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: A consensus study. Virchows Arch 2005; 447: 794-799.
16. Bassi C, Sarr MG, Lillemoe KD, et al: Natural history of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN): current evidence and implications for management. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 645-650.
17. Käppeli RM, Müller SA, Hummel B, et al: IPMN: surgical treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398: 1029-1037.
18. Mori Y, Ohtsuka T, Tamura K, et al: Intraoperative irrigation cytology of the remnant pancreas to detect remnant distinct pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm undergoing partial pancreatectomy. Surgery 2014; 155: 67-73.
19. Tamura K, Ohtsuka T, Ideno N, et al: Treatment strategy for main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas based on the assessment of recurrence in the remnant pancreas after resection: A retrospective review. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 360-368.
20. Zhang T, Du X, Zhao Y: Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic lesions: current status and future. Front Med 2011; 5: 277-282.
21. Glanemann M, Shi B, Liang F, et al: Surgical strategies for treatment of malignant pancreatic tumors: extended, standard or local surgery? World J Surg Oncol 2008; 6: 123.
22. Marescaux J, Clément JM, Tassetti V, et al: Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 627-634.
23. Lamadé W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, et al: The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 1256-1261.
24. Saito S, Yamanaka J, Miura K, et al: A novel 3D hepatectomy simulation based on liver circulation: Application to liver resection and transplantation. Hepatology 2005; 41: 1297-1304.
25. Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, et al: Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 629-638; discussion 638.
26. Herline AJ, Stefansic JD, Debelak JP, et al: Image-guided surgery: preliminary feasibility studies of frameless stereotactic liver surgery. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 644-649; discussion 649-650.
27. Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T, et al: Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: A first step towards 'navigated control' for liver surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16: 165-170.
28. Cash DM, Miga MI, Sinha TK, et al: Compensating for intraoperative soft-tissue deformations using incomplete surface data and finite elements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24: 1479-1491.
29. Cash DM, Miga MI, Glasgow SC, et al: Concepts and preliminary data toward the realization of image-guided liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 844-859.
30. Hansen C, Wieferich J, Ritter F, et al: Illustrative visualization of 3D planning models for augmented reality in liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010; 5: 133-141.
31. Peterhans M, vom Berg A, Dagon B, et al: A navigation system for open liver surgery: design, workflow and first clinical applications. Int J Med Robot 2011; 7: 7-16.
32. Stefansic JD, Herline AJ, Shyr Y, et al: Registration of physical space to laparoscopic image space for use in minimally invasive hepatic surgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000; 19: 1012-1023.
33. Rauth TP, Bao PQ, Galloway RL, et al: Laparoscopic surface scanning and subsurface targeting: implications for image-guided laparoscopic liver surgery. Surgery 2007; 142: 207-214.
34. Hostettler A, Nicolau SA, Rémond Y, et al: A real-time predictive simulation of abdominal viscera positions during quiet free breathing. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2010; 103: 169-184.
35. Marzano E, Piardi T, Soler L, et al: Augmented reality-guided artery-first pancreatico-duodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 1980-1983.
36. Marescaux J, Rubino F, Arenas M, et al: Augmented-reality-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. JAMA 2004; 292: 2214-2215.
37. Konishi K, Hashizume M, Nakamoto M, et al: Augmented reality navigation system for endoscopic surgery based on three-dimensional ultrasound and computed tomography: Application to 20 clinical cases. Int Congr Ser 2005; 1281: 537-542.
38. Teber D, Guven S, Simpfendörfer T, et al: Augmented reality: A new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 332-338.
39. Ukimura O, Magi-Galluzzi C, Gill IS: Realtime transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins. J Urol 2006; 175: 1304-1310.
40. Simpfendörfer T, Baumhauer M, Müller M, et al: Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1841-1845.
41. Ukimura O, Gill IS: Image-fusion, augmented reality, and predictive surgical navigation. Urol Clin North Am 2009; 36: 115-123, vii.
42. Shekhar R, Dandekar O, Bhat V, et al: Live augmented reality: A new visualization method for laparoscopic surgery using continuous volumetric computed tomography. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1976-1985.
43. Ieiri S, Uemura M, Konishi K, et al: Augmented reality navigation system for laparoscopic splenectomy in children based on preoperative CT image using optical tracking device. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28: 341-346.
44. Mårvik R, Langø T, Tangen GA, Andersen JO, Kaspersen JH, Ystgaard B, et al: Laparoscopic navigation pointer for three-dimensional image-guided surgery. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1242-1248.
45. Baumhauer M, Feuerstein M, Meinzer HP, et al: Navigation in endoscopic soft tissue surgery: perspectives and limitations. J Endourol 2008; 22: 751-766.
46. Gavaghan KA, Peterhans M, Oliveira-Santos T, et al: A portable image overlay projection device for computer-aided open liver surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 1855-1864.
47. Gavaghan K, Oliveira-Santos T, Peterhans M, et al: Evaluation of a portable image overlay projector for the visualisation of surgical navigation data: phantom studies. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2012; 7: 547-556.